Hostile said:
This is to settle something. To those tired of the topic, my apologies.
Compare the careers of Favre & Bledsoe. Considering their respective careers, how would you describe your assessment of them head to head?
Favre: Fan favorite, can-do kinda players. Exciting to watch, always seemed to find a way to win, easily the most explosive player on the field. Never much of a fan though, because of his recklessness - I still think he plays the same way, but he is no longer getting away with what he used to. Not because he has no players - it's just the way it happens. Can't deny his ability back in the day though. Just not my kind of player. During his best years, there was always a chance that you would win.
Bledsoe: I always liked him in NE, and even though I like Brady, I felt sorry for him. Then, in Buffalo, saw some things that I think had always been there, but were now just painfully obvious. He can put the rock anywhere, and usually makes good decisions - but while I feel you can always win a game with Favre, I don't feel that from Bledsoe. He seems to be a pass it all day kinda guy, but not one I feel is going to win in the most desparate situations. He is kind of Manning-esque to me. He did win me back a bit last season - but eventually he will need to do it at the end of the season as well. Right now, his career has, to me, been more about stats than about his ability to get wins.
Overall - Favre has a much bigger edge because of the winning. For years his team was a winner and contender - and to say it is because Bledsoe never had a team around him is asinine to me. Both guys never had a truly complete team, but Favre was the type of player who could take over his team and make them win. Bledsoe has never been that guy.
Maybe with the talent we are stock piling, Bledsoe's ability to post excellent statistics will translate into wins - but I need it to be proved to me.