CoCo;2319057 said:So you contend that Felix is faster than Julius?
Do you think he plays faster than his 4.47 combine time because I don't consider 4.47 to be at all special?
I'd have to agree with all of the above.Joe Realist;2318931 said:Here are some reasons why Felix Jones is better:
1.) better vision
2.) can get to the corner faster
3.) is stronger, does not go down when the wind blows
4.) can cut better and quicker
5.) better receiver
Julius has some speed but did not read blocks or decided to ignore them
CoCo;2318957 said:F
3)Felix may well be stronger but I don't think that's been much of a factor in his success to date. I really don't recall him breaking tackles. Maybe I'm not remembering well.
His combine time is not a true representation of his speed. Someone had posted other timed 40s which were faster on another thread. I watched his 4.47 time during the combine and knew that he was faster after watching him pull away from LSU defenders while he was an Arkansas Razorback. His 4.47 speed is equal to that of Isaiah Stanback's '4.58' speed. In other words, they're both wrong and slower than each player's top gear.CoCo;2319057 said:So you contend that Felix is faster than Julius?
Do you think he plays faster than his 4.47 combine time because I don't consider 4.47 to be at all special?
CoCo;2319057 said:So you contend that Felix is faster than Julius?
Do you think he plays faster than his 4.47 combine time because I don't consider 4.47 to be at all special?
Very well put. That's it in a nutshell.joseephuss;2319087 said:Barber and Felix are a better tandem. Perhaps it is because Felix can handle a lesser work load better. Julius needs more than just a handful of carries to be effective.
CoCo;2318911 said:I'm as hopeful as the next guy regarding Felix' Cowboy future. I want to believe he'll be tremendously productive for years to come.
Of course we all remember Julius entree as a rookie too and the board was giddy over the guy just like with Felix now.
So what is it about Felix that makes us think his performances will continue whereas Julius just faded away. Do you consider him faster than Julius? Better moves? More decisive?
I'm particularly interested in what people think Julius would have done with Felix opportunities in 2008. To me, Felix does not look faster than Julius. We've debated Felix combine 4.47 but it seems Julius could easily match that IMO. Felix big plays, to me, have been because of speed primarily. Moves? Not really. Broken tackles? I don't think so. Great decisions? The holes seemed obvious.
What's the difference that will make Felix productivity lasting?
CoCo;2318973 said:How bout I ask this question a different way.
Who here, when the board was gaga over Julius early, was the voice of reason who said he would eventually be revealed as fools gold?
I'm told there were a couple folks. Honestly, I was never on board with both feet like many were. So if Julius fooled the masses before what makes you so sure that Felix fate isn't eventually the same.
And I'm not talking 2006 & 2007 Julius. Duh, anyone can see the difference in productivity there. I'm talking vintage Julius versus today's Felix.
CoCo;2318911 said:So what is it about Felix that makes us think his performances will continue whereas Julius just faded away. Do you consider him faster than Julius? Better moves? More decisive?
I'm particularly interested in what people think Julius would have done with Felix opportunities in 2008. To me, Felix does not look faster than Julius. We've debated Felix combine 4.47 but it seems Julius could easily match that IMO. Felix big plays, to me, have been because of speed primarily. Moves? Not really. Broken tackles? I don't think so. Great decisions? The holes seemed obvious.
Chief;2319168 said:This is a good question, CoCo.
I'm not surprised you had to ask the question a different way the second time so some of the geniuses here could get it.
The fact is, after Julius' rookie year, most thought that he would be the team's franchise back for the next 10 years. His Thanksgiving Day performance, especially, was impressive.
But I think back to early on in his rookie year when he took himself out of a game by tapping his helmet and received Parcells' wrath. Maybe that was a clue that something was missing with this guy.
I think Felix has the intangibles that Julius didn't have. He has a great mental makeup to go along with his obvious physical talent.
Cali'sFinest;2319239 said:Thanks for the intelligent response!! I was about to give up on reading this thread because everyone that posted before you failed to read the original post or just fail at reading all together.
I'm interested in what people think since I didn't get to watch Julius in his ROOKIE season. I really like Felix. But I'll save my man-crush feelings on him for another thread.
CoCo;2318973 said:How bout I ask this question a different way.
Who here, when the board was gaga over Julius early, was the voice of reason who said he would eventually be revealed as fools gold?
I'm told there were a couple folks. Honestly, I was never on board with both feet like many were. So if Julius fooled the masses before what makes you so sure that Felix fate isn't eventually the same.
And I'm not talking 2006 & 2007 Julius. Duh, anyone can see the difference in productivity there. I'm talking vintage Julius versus today's Felix.
good point imo fwiw tbh bbqjoseephuss;2319255 said:Forget you. My post was the best. In fact it was the best post ever.