Don Corleone
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,485
- Reaction score
- 4,597
Felix seems a lot more fluid and has a bit more burst. He also seems to have better vision.
manimal;2319224 said:I dont consider him faster than Julius. I think Julius has just as good of "moves".
However I do think he makes better decisions. I have yet to see him run straight into the OL back.
You say the holes seem obvious. Yes, they are. They were also obvious for Julius but he apparently was too dense to choose to run through them. Many times he could have used one of his Felix-esque moves to juke the safety and score but he chose not too.
Plumfool;2319398 said:I can guarantee you Julius could never return a kick off
CoCo;2319057 said:So you contend that Felix is faster than Julius?
Do you think he plays faster than his 4.47 combine time because I don't consider 4.47 to be at all special?
stealth;2319294 said:If you were really watching julius his rookie season you could see how limited he was. Even the highlight video one. It was easy to fall in love with some of his break away runs but he always tried to get there the same way. When the league caught up to him he got controlled.
I hope he does well in seattle, but my instincts say he won't.
Felix is very fluid and has a body control that Julius never will have.
CoCo;2318973 said:How bout I ask this question a different way.
Who here, when the board was gaga over Julius early, was the voice of reason who said he would eventually be revealed as fools gold?
I'm told there were a couple folks. Honestly, I was never on board with both feet like many were. So if Julius fooled the masses before what makes you so sure that Felix fate isn't eventually the same.
And I'm not talking 2006 & 2007 Julius. Duh, anyone can see the difference in productivity there. I'm talking vintage Julius versus today's Felix.
CoCo;2318957 said:From your list, and I'm not trying to be critical, I don't know that we have enough evidence to conclude the above.
1) Better vision? Perhaps so. Let's see some more.
Uh, he's reading the field as well as (dare I say it?) Emmitt ever did. And that was Emmitt's game. Julius, even at his highligh-reel laden prime, wasn't as much reading the field as he was taking a wicked cut and running fast.
Felix is faster than Emmitt was (but of course he's not as hard to take down as 22 was), but I'll admit I'm not convinced that he's as fast as JuJo. It looks faster, I believe, because he's running at just about the optimal angle EVERY time. I'm not trying to be hyperbolic here... I think this kid has elite vision. What are you waiting to see before you agree?
CoCo;2318911 said:I'm as hopeful as the next guy regarding Felix' Cowboy future. I want to believe he'll be tremendously productive for years to come.
Of course we all remember Julius entree as a rookie too and the board was giddy over the guy just like with Felix now.
So what is it about Felix that makes us think his performances will continue whereas Julius just faded away. Do you consider him faster than Julius? Better moves? More decisive?
I'm particularly interested in what people think Julius would have done with Felix opportunities in 2008. To me, Felix does not look faster than Julius. We've debated Felix combine 4.47 but it seems Julius could easily match that IMO. Felix big plays, to me, have been because of speed primarily. Moves? Not really. Broken tackles? I don't think so. Great decisions? The holes seemed obvious.
What's the difference that will make Felix productivity lasting?
CoCo;2318911 said:I'm as hopeful as the next guy regarding Felix' Cowboy future. I want to believe he'll be tremendously productive for years to come.
Of course we all remember Julius entree as a rookie too and the board was giddy over the guy just like with Felix now.
So what is it about Felix that makes us think his performances will continue whereas Julius just faded away. Do you consider him faster than Julius? Better moves? More decisive?
I'm particularly interested in what people think Julius would have done with Felix opportunities in 2008. To me, Felix does not look faster than Julius. We've debated Felix combine 4.47 but it seems Julius could easily match that IMO. Felix big plays, to me, have been because of speed primarily. Moves? Not really. Broken tackles? I don't think so. Great decisions? The holes seemed obvious.
What's the difference that will make Felix productivity lasting?