DragonCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,498
- Reaction score
- 250
Bleu Star;2567852 said:Yes. I do support all 53 and I have the right to criticize as well. If you were really paying attention you would have noticed that I pointed out two main things about TO that piss me off as well just last week. You probably never noticed that..
So why aren't there any of these little threads "Mason > TO?"
Don't kid with me. It's obvious you think that Romo's the main culprit here. Romo's passes have sucked lately, yes. However, Romo's not the one blowing blocking assignments. Romo's not the one committing illegal formation penalties. Romo's not the one committing false starts at the worst time possible. Romo's not the one running incorrect routes. Romo's not the one jogging his routes. It would also help if a receiver would be so nice as to at least attempt to knock the ball down?
Romo makes a lot of mistakes. When he's put under pressure, he often throws interceptions, and when he tries to make a play happen he fumbles the ball.
HOWEVER, Flacco's receivers play harder, stupid penalties are lower, the run game works, and his defense is phenomenal. Put Romo as QB in Baltimore, and I think while he'd have less production, he'd have more wins (and he'd win in the postseason).
This December slump was existent before Romo, so it's not "just" Romo and it's not "mostly" Romo.
Let's remember how godawful this team was when Romo wasn't quarterback.
I'm all for bringing in competition/a viable back-up. But that's not going to solve all of our problems. Neither is having Flacco behind center.