- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
MichaelWinicki;1214612 said:
Juke99;1213791 said:Hmmmmm....why is it that anytime someone is critical of a player's performance, they're slapped with the "hater" label?
Or it is just slang lingo for "critical" usually unjust or exagerated criticism.Alexander;1214693 said:Because that is what the "liker" chooses to do when they really don't have much of a defense.
Aikbach;1214697 said:Or it is just slang lingo for "critical" usually unjust or exagerated criticism.
Well consider this thread the tenth time and it presents a handful of quality justifications not to give up on Spears.Alexander;1214709 said:I don't view it that way.
Nine times out of ten if someone uses that term with me in a debate they are an imbecile who lacks the brainpower to back up their assertions.
Aikbach;1214710 said:Well consider this thread the tenth time and it presents a handful of quality justifications not to give up on Spears.
'Twas a quick thread title, nothing serious, just an observation for the sour voices that denounce a player after one terrible game. Granted Spears isn't a highlight reel maker but he is hardly incompetent. Parcells motivates players that he likes, he wants him to play better because he knows he can not because he's flat out lousy but because he can dominate if he put his mind to it and worked hard to get quicker and more powerful.Alexander;1214714 said:Obviously you have mistaken me for one of these "haters". I am far from it.
But when someone uses the term, I go into lockdown mode. Try "critic". It is much more dignified. And it helps your stance. It really does.