aikemirv
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,444
- Reaction score
- 10,041
Not in the playoffs. He was on point, spot on, an enigma. Meanwhile, Romo was the opposite. In big games,
Like this:
Not in the playoffs. He was on point, spot on, an enigma. Meanwhile, Romo was the opposite. In big games,
I’m just taking this post from my earlier post but where are all these stats coming from? Link? Or make believe scenarios?
So easy to grab stats. Let’s see, 2018 - 2005 = 13 * 16 = 208
Lol if my math is right, each team has played 208 games since 2005. We’re talking about 27 games.
QB A) 3 Super bowl Rings/ Super Bowl mvp.
QB B) No NFC Championship appearances, no Super bowl appearances, no Super bowl mvp.
Which QB is which?
He went to and won 3 Super Bowl titles, is that not enough for you? Should he have won one more to solidify it for you? Would have had Jimmy Johnson had stayed. Comparing Aikaman, in an era where you could kill the QB to Romo, in an era where you couldn't touch the QB, give me a break. Let me have your FAN CARD! Don't ever compare those two again.Like this:
None of those are QB stats, they are all team results. The only real way that that statement would be valid is if this was golf or tennis where there is 1v1 play.QB A) 3 Super bowl Rings/ Super Bowl mvp.
QB B) No NFC Championship appearances, no Super bowl appearances, no Super bowl mvp.
Which QB is which?
He went to and won 3 Super Bowl titles, is that not enough for you? Should he have won one more to solidify it for you? Would have had Jimmy Johnson had stayed. Comparing Aikaman, in an era where you could kill the QB to Romo, in an era where you couldn't touch the QB, give me a break. Let me have your FAN CARD! Don't ever compare those two again.
There's one that's a QB stat, MVP of a SUPER BOWL!!!!!!!!!! I like that statNone of those are QB stats, they are all team results. The only real way that that statement would be valid is if this was golf or tennis where there is 1v1 play.
You are delusional with your views on Fantasy Football. Just because you think it has ruined football, doesnt make it so. Your view of fans is so condescending it makes me ill. The fans on this board do not come here because they play Fantasy Football. Fans want wins above all else, some of just are just not so blind to think tat a mdern day NFL team can win with a QB that cant throw the ball down the field. The rules of the game have changed so drastically in the past 7 years that you must be able to throw. Look at the last 10 SB participants, not just he winners. Thats 20 QBs..... lets lookIs anyone but Fantasy players really interested in any stat other than winning?
I suppose there are just fans who hopped on our wagon because of Dak. I guess fans still flock to teams because of a player?
Stats are only used in an argument to provide a theory in defense or to attack those who come up short in winning.
You should try comparing Romo to Danny White. Oh wait, Danny White went to three consecutive NFC Championships. So we need to compare him to like Quincy Carter or something along his lines.Cowboys won 5 Super Bowls.
Oh yeah Romo was so protected - surely you jest - Romo had 7 roughing the passer calls for him for his career. Try another goalpost!
That stat means nothing without the other stats of the game. What were the rushing yards in those games? What were the avg points given up in those games. What were the defensive yards allowed in those games. Usually when you have few passing yards it is because you did not NEED to pass to win the game so you played conservative and did not take chances.
When Eli got super bowl mvp in the 2007 super bowl while his defense held the greatest offense I'd seen to 17 points, I stopped thinking that meant anything.There's one that's a QB stat, MVP of a SUPER BOWL!!!!!!!!!! I like that stat
And then you proceeded to argue against a game that somebody listed, as falling under that criteria. By using your own subjective definition....., so don’t play the babe in the woods routine
Uhh, isn't that the whole point? Fans are complaining about not passing for 200 yards on Sunday night, but we did not NEED to pass more -- we passed efficiently, built a big lead and won the game. Passing efficiency is what wins, not total passing yards.
He went to two Super bowls and won both of them. Romo went to ZERO NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES, not even close.When Eli got super bowl mvp in the 2007 super bowl while his defense held the greatest offense I'd seen to 17 points, I stopped thinking that meant anything.
I have no problems criticizing Dak, but not about 160 yards.No, that was not the point. The point was that criticism of Dak was not allowed because we won the game.
I have no problems criticizing Dak, but not about 160 yards.
He went to two Super bowls and won both of them. Romo went to ZERO NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES, not even close.
He must have been an incredible defensive player to hold almost all the playoff teams the Giants played in both runs well below their averages.He went to two Super bowls and won both of them. Romo went to ZERO NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES, not even close.
Throughout history, new methods and/or technology increased the number of ways criticism could be disseminated and will continue to do so but that is not what I meant. Criticism is as old as humanity and individuals are not above being criticized. However, it is applicable logic behind any criticism that differentiates what is or is not relevantly directed at whomever is being criticized. The same can be said of those who have played, are playing or will later play quarterback for this or any other franchise.