forget every thread you ever read about these two...Roy v Ed Reed

BigDFan5;1311265 said:
how many has he given up?

according to Adam in another thread, Roy gave up, or was involved in, eight touchdowns
 
ima call for a full on high jack of this thread, there is nothign going on but ignorant mud slinging anyways.

I WANNA SEE NAKED LEOPARDMEN!
 
zrinkill;1311261 said:
:lmao::lmao2::lmao::lmao2:

So no player on defense should allow anyone else to score?

This is not Madden 2006 kid .....


speak for yourself! my friend put up 62 on me!















i'm just glad i put up 69 on him :D
 
MichaelWinicki;1311255 said:
I'd trade Roy for Ed Reed in a NY second...

But I don't think the Ravens would trade Reed even up for Roy.

Of course you would .... because for the last 2 years we have been getting burnt on long TD's

Now if we had Reed and this conservative D plan was letting people RUN all over us for 2 years we would have people saying

"man I wish we had that Roy Williams who plays for the Ravens .... that guy would not let Alexander run all over our defense"

:rolleyes: Cowboys fans are spoiled brats.
 
?????

I don't see why this even being argued. Roy did not look good in the last half of the season.
 
Gaede;1311268 said:
no, simply, Roy should give up less touchdowns.

Stop calling me kid.

Sorry man ..... but you look like a Teenager in your avatar.

I wish our D never gave up TD's as well ..... but like I said this is not Madden.
 
Gaede;1311273 said:
according to Adam in another thread, Roy gave up, or was involved in, eight touchdowns

So then you saw where he gave up about the same amount of TD's as all other safeties that are considered great, and yet you are unhappy? Maybe your standards are unrealistic?
 
smarta5150;1311277 said:
And Reed gave up 6.

and...???

I already said I don't care about Reed or any other safety. I just want Roy to play better.
 
zrinkill;1311285 said:
Sorry man ..... but you look like a Teenager in your avatar.

I wish our D never gave up TD's as well ..... but like I said this is not Madden.

Have fun Kill... I am abandonning this thread.

I already missed the 1st half of the game, oops.
 
Gaede;1311283 said:
?????

I don't see why this even being argued. Roy did not look good in the last half of the season.

Because there is a Difference in someone not looking good (though I dont think he looked that bad) and "SUCKING" as alot of people on this thread are saying.
 
Gaede;1311288 said:
and...???

I already said I don't care about Reed or any other safety. I just want Roy to play better.

But if he is playing on Par or better than every other Safety in the league .... what do you expect??????
 
Gaede;1311288 said:
and...???

I already said I don't care about Reed or any other safety. I just want Roy to play better.

Ok last post.


I compared him to Reed because apparently every safety strives to be like Ed Reed, I did say apparently.

And 2 TDs more isnt too far off from "the man."
 
zrinkill;1311240 said:
This is total bull ..... Some of you guys must have never played football in you're life.


i know your not talking to me. cause i have. and what does me stating a fact have anything to do with playing football.
 
stealth;1311274 said:
ima call for a full on high jack of this thread, there is nothign going on but ignorant mud slinging anyways.

I WANNA SEE NAKED LEOPARDMEN!


Thats superpunks desktop wallpaper, screensaver, and a wallet size print out in his wallet
 
We didn't need Roy against the run. Stopping the run was actually something our front 7 did well this year. We needed him to help us stop the big play, and to keep the TE from tearing up the middle of the field.

So when he wasn't a liability, he was just superfluous.
 
locked&loaded;1311295 said:
i know your not talking to me. cause i have. and what does me stating a fact have anything to do with playing football.


exactly what fact would that be?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,339
Messages
13,868,079
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top