Free agent Romo would be the highest paid player in the NFL

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Just what is Tony Romo worth on the open market?

It was reported on ESPN Radio, then again by Todd Archer, and elsewhere on various internet outposts, that a prominent AFC offensive coordinator said Tony Romo would quickly and easily become the highest paid player in the NFL if Dallas released him to free agency.

Archer agrees with that sentiment. So do I. And Brian Broaddus and Babe Laufenberg. Frankly, if you don't think so, you're delusional. It's pretty much a given.

Consider that Alex Smith fetched two No. 2 picks from Kansas City. Then factor in that Romo is approximately one million times better than Alex Smith. I have little doubt the Cowboys could probably get a first and two seconds, if not more, for Romo right here and now. Teams would drool over the chance to nab him.

So when the seemingly staggering numbers drop for Romo soon - possibly in the 6-year, $100 million range - folks should remember that Romo has incredible leverage because he's incredibly good. Half the league would pay him that without blinking an eye. Jerry has no better option in the wings, especially with a roster possibly primed for legitimacy with a good offseason. And it's not like it takes great teams anymore to win big in the NFL.

Yes, we have that hard-to-explain segment of our fanbase that doesn't recognize or understand just how good Romo is. What he has done amidst this atrociously run franchise is nothing short of Staubachian. He's won 5-6 games all by himself the past two years alone.

It's hard not to admire the guy. Romo has made himself into a Top Ten quarterback despite having no pedigree, a short stature, a weak arm out of college, multiple attempts to annoint other QBs, and absolutely no care in the world from his "GM" about offensive blocking capacity. Nonexistent defenses, matador pass protection, and fart-and-fall-down running games have been Romo's support system on Sunday.

Romo has strengthened his arm, learned the NFL game intuitively, improved dramatically in his accuracy and pocket awareness....and he's dodged, danced, and run like hell for about every win this team has had since he took over. He's endured all the unfairness and stilted criticism that goes with being the Cowboys' quarterback, and he's patiently bitten his tongue toward management publickly.

Sure, he's richer than rich, got the hot wife, and lives the good life. But that doesn't make it right. That's just the way talented, hard-working, focused people live, much to the chagrin of the great unwashed.

So many in Dallas want him gone. Heard the same thing about Dirk. Shoot, we heard it about Aikman around here once upon a time, as nuts as that sounds. Danny White took a beating around here despite playing brilliantly on a team of has-beens, can't-no-mores, and never-dids.

Dallas can be such a pathetic sports town at times.

I, for one, will enjoy the next 4-5 seasons with Romo around. I hope for his sake he gets a couple years of legitimate shots to win a Super Bowl. I hope he can compartmentalize it all when his career is over. He has right to be bitter.

And I wish I could apologize face-to-face for it all. Hopefully, some do when given the chance.

Simply put, it's BS what Romo has to tolerate around here.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,728
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
At 100 mil for 6 years, he would not be the highest paid player in the league.

I have Romo's back too, but I really hope we keep it under 100 mil, even if it really is the guaranteed dollars that matter. 100 mil just sounds over-the-top to the average fan and some on the fence may actually join the dark, slimy dungeon of the haters club.:p:

:star:
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
i don't know if he would be the highest paid player in the nfl, but he would be very close to the top. some of that is about timing though as with all free agent contracts. if you hit the market when many teams need a player at your position you will get more money and qb's are always in demand and paid alot
 

Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,697
out of morbid curiosity...on what bases would Romo be highest paid player. I am assuming contract negotiations would include factual evidence not objective opinions.
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,384
Reaction score
23,823
He said romo could become highest paid player on an open market.

The 6 yr 100 million dollar deal that he estimated wasn't on a open market. That's him re-signing in Dallas
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,728
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
GloryDaysRBack;5011477 said:
He said romo could become highest paid player on an open market.

The 6 yr 100 million dollar deal that he estimated wasn't on a open market. That's him re-signing in Dallas
Ah, that's right. Good catch.

Still hope it's not 100 mil. 5 years for 75 or 80
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
Romo is a much better QB than him in my opinion - but Joe Flacco would demand more on an open market right now riding a Super Bowl MVP and nearly flawless postseason.
 

Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,697
Apollo Creed;5011486 said:
Romo is a much better QB than him in my opinion - but Joe Flacco would demand more on an open market right now riding a Super Bowl MVP and nearly flawless postseason.

you might want to update your mind. Flacco had amazing run this year. 11 TD and 0 INTs and Super Bowl victory should mean something.
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
Wood;5011493 said:
you might want to update your mind. Flacco had amazing run this year. 11 TD and 0 INTs and Super Bowl victory should mean something.

Put Romo on the Ravens and they're just as competitive.

Put lead footed Joe Flacco behind this line, with this running game - things would get ugly.

And update my mind? If it was Tom Brady I could understand but Joe Flacco isn't asked to do nearly as much as Romo is. Manage the game, lean on a historically great defense, hand the ball to one of the better running backs in the game, behind a line loaded with quality starters and high draft picks.

Not that tough of a job, ultimately making his performance not that impressive of a job.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Apollo Creed;5011503 said:
Put Romo on the Ravens and they're just as competitive.

Put lead footed Joe Flacco behind this line, with this running game - things would get ugly.

And update my mind? If it was Tom Brady I could understand but Joe Flacco isn't asked to do nearly as much as Romo is. Manage the game, lean on a historically great defense, hand the ball to one of the better running backs in the game, behind a line loaded with quality starters and high draft picks.

Not that tough of a job, ultimately making his performance not that impressive of a job.

Ravens would be better off tagging Flacco for a year and see if he can do it again. The franchise numbers keep coming down with the Brady and proposed Stafford deals. Giving Flacco a 20m/yr contract is a bad idea and something Balt rarely does.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,728
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
bkight13;5011558 said:
Ravens would be better off tagging Flacco for a year and see if he can do it again. The franchise numbers keep coming down with the Brady and proposed Stafford deals. Giving Flacco a 20m/yr contract is a bad idea and something Balt rarely does.
That three game stretch for Joe was huge. It's like it erased an entire career of mediocrity.

Thanks to playing on a very good team, he already had a pretty decent sample size in the playoffs. Before this year, his playoff QB rating was in the 70s and he had as many ints as TDs. The very defintion of mediocre...and with a sample size that could not be overlooked.

And before someone says last year he had them one play from the Super Bowl if they hadn't missed a FG....they need to recall that he threw a pick 6 right before that to put them in the hole in the first place.

He may very well have turned the corner. But I would be wary to pay 20m/yr for 3 good playoff games when the past had been fairly JAG-like.

Give him his credit, but be careful, I say.
 

samilpa4life

Active Member
Messages
171
Reaction score
230
I am a 100% Romo backer, no telling what our team would look like without him. I get so tired of my friends, the so called Cowboys experts who just go off on Romo. When he finally has a good offensive line & running game, the sky is the limit for our team. I am a Cowboy4life supporter, not a bandwagon fan and I cannot wait for the day when we win the Super Bowl again and I do believe Romo can deliver us one.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
I don't see any way Romo would be signing to play for 16.6 Million a season.

On a secondary note, Flacco has had much more then just a mediocre career up to the playoffs last season. He's actually played pretty well IMO, especially in the playoffs.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
samilpa4life;5011565 said:
I am a 100% Romo backer, no telling what our team would look like without him. I get so tired of my friends, the so called Cowboys experts who just go off on Romo. When he finally has a good offensive line & running game, the sky is the limit for our team. I am a Cowboy4life supporter, not a bandwagon fan and I cannot wait for the day when we win the Super Bowl again and I do believe Romo can deliver us one.

Being a Romo fan does not make you a better Cowboy fan, just as being a fan who does not support Romo does not make a person a bandwagon fan.

Everybody has opinion. There are good fans on both sides of that issue.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,728
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
ABQCOWBOY;5011570 said:
I don't see any way Romo would be signing to play for 16.6 Million a season.

On a secondary note, Flacco has had much more then just a mediocre career up to the playoffs last season. He's actually played pretty well IMO, especially in the playoffs.
Flacco's arrow is pointing up for sure.

Still, going into this year year, Flacco had 8 TDs and 8 ints in the playoffs with a 9 game sample.

Had had registered playoff WINS with QB ratings of 10 (lowest in playoff history) and 59. Wins.
He had a loss where he had 0 TD and 3 ints. QB rating of 18. Almost impossibly bad.
His overall Playoff rating was in the high 70s.

But this is where there is a legit argument for him. He played great this year, as we all know. And he also played very solid ball in the playoffs last season--excluding the pick six in the AFC Champ game.

For a 28 year old QB, that is a good argument for him going forward.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,077
Reaction score
16,851
Great post, EROD. I largely agree with your sentiment that Romo is undervalued and underappreciated in Cowboy nation.

But as I've posted in a different thread...I don't try to extend Romo's contract. I just don't believe in giving huge money to players of his age. And it could take HUGE MONEY.
 

ROUSH8692

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,581
Reaction score
368
Wood;5011476 said:
out of morbid curiosity...on what bases would Romo be highest paid player. I am assuming contract negotiations would include factual evidence not objective opinions.

Speaking of factual evidence, aren't you the person who created the FALSE thread of Romo choosing receivers instead of offensive lineman? :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
DFWJC;5011582 said:
Flacco's arrow is pointing up for sure.

Still, going into this year year, Flacco had 8 TDs and 8 ints in the playoffs with a 9 game sample.

Had had registered playoff WINS with QB ratings of 10 (lowest in playoff history) and 59. Wins.
He had a loss where he had 0 TD and 3 ints. QB rating of 18. Almost impossibly bad.
His overall Playoff rating was in the high 70s.

But this is where there is a legit argument for him. He played great this year, as we all know. And he also played very solid ball in the playoffs last season--excluding the pick six in the AFC Champ game.

For a 28 year old QB, that is a good argument for him going forward.


If you combine all of his playoff numbers, it looks very average but, as I said and as you are pointing out here to an extent, if you look at what he has done the past few years, he is absolutely much better then just average.

Over the last 3 post seasons, he is a 59.3% passer, which is not out of this world but more importantly, he is 18 TDs vs 2 INTs. Obviously, last year was outstanding but even in the previous two seasons, he was above a 90 rating. He's really been playing pretty well in the playoffs for the Ravens for about 3 years now.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
ROUSH8692;5011598 said:
Speaking of factual evidence, aren't you the person who created the FALSE thread of Romo choosing receivers instead of offensive lineman? :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:

Simmer down. That thread was posted by a news agency and was miss represented by that same agency. Wood did not write the story.
 
Top