dbair1967
Arch Defender
- Messages
- 30,782
- Reaction score
- 1
STSINAZ;1101709 said:merriman the next LT
Ware the next Greg Ellis
and stsinaz should be the next banned member
David
STSINAZ;1101709 said:merriman the next LT
Ware the next Greg Ellis
dbair1967;1101712 said:and stsinaz should be the next banned member
David
cobra;1101122 said:There are too many idiots on this board. Sorry.
cwalk;1101076 said:And for the record I don't compare him to Shawn Merriman anymore...I compare him to the other #94 that played for the Cowboys C.Haley...because that was the last great presser player we had...and if we do this as Cowboy fans then we all can clearly see that this kid is not living up to the hype...sorry but when I flash back to how Haley played in that #94 a tear comes to my eye...damn I miss presser like that!
But let me end this by sayin that as a Cowboy fan for 37 years I pray(foreal)that this kid is the truth..cause if not this defense can't be great!!!!
When Haley first came into the league, he was really not great against the run. In fact, most teams tried to run at him when they could.
In his first two years in the league, he only started 3 games. He was used as a pass rush specialist a great deal.
You just hit the nail right on the head you what poisons some fans minds the fact that the player that is picked in the first round regardless of position they expect them to make an immediate impact and that is very rare a few done it but that's the key word "few", another trap some "fairweather fan" fall in is that they drink all of the "hype aid" Kiper, and other "experts" spew about how they will be this and that at the next level.ABQCOWBOY;1101780 said:This kind of makes me chuckle. If you are comparing Ware to Haley, and you've been a cowboy fan for 37 years, then I can't imagine you saw too much of Haley at a comparable time in his career.
When Haley first came into the league, he was really not great against the run. In fact, most teams tried to run at him when they could. In his first two years in the league, he only started 3 games. He was used as a pass rush specialist a great deal.
Are these two comparable?
Haley's First Two Years
Tkls Solo Sacks FF INT TDs
59 49 12 4 1 0
25 21 7 1 0 0
Ware's First Year and Projected Second year.
Tkls Solo Sacks FF INT TDs
58 47 8 3 0 0
45 40 5 NA 1 1
In Ware's case, tough to judge FF, INTs and TDs so I simply left the figures as they stand now but I think the Sacks in his second year are a conservative number. I expect he will likely get as many or more then he did last year but we can go with these numbers. Also interesting to note that Ware as started every game since he came into the league. He is an every down player now. I think it's unfortunate that so many are so quick to judge this guy before he's even had opportunity to learn his craft. Not surprising thou.
STSINAZ;1102482 said:did you ever think that maybe haley was one of the reasons they won that superbowl you are referring to? ware is far away from haley at this point or where he was in his 2nd year...he is about at where greg ellis was in his 2nd year...maybe a little further but not by much
STSINAZ;1104731 said:you really do need to get a life tony blair...seriously
Rack;1102463 said:Same can be said about Ware last year.
Haley went to the 49ers, at that time they were one of the top teams in the NFL. They won the superbowl Haley's rookie year, and the year after.
Not even CLOSE to being a fair comparison.
To be able to contribute 12 sacks to a superbowl team, that says a lot IMO.
At this point in time, Ware can't hold Haley's jock.
That said, I think he's got the potential to be just as good as Haley. My only problem with Ware is how he finishes games. He seems to get a sack or a good play early on, then disappears.
Edit: Whoops. I got my years mixed up. The 9ers didn't win the SB in Haley's rookie year. They won it in his 3rd year. They were still a playoff team his rookie year though, and he did have 11.5 sacks in their first superbowl season (Haley's 3rd year). He had 10.5 the next season (when they won the SB again).