Future QB Debate is OVER

He did not engineer Philly game 2. The defense did and Roy Williams and Donovan McNabb engineered it for us. He also played poorly in BOTH Washington games. You mean he had nothing to do with the wooping 14 pts he put on the scoreboard. He also played poorly in the Oakland game as well by not producing on offense.

I cant recall every game play by play, but I know his passing hasnt been the best all season long. And the defense has helped him out. You seriously need to stop licking his nuts. Your argument is weak.



DBoys said:
I am talking come from behind victories that he engineered.

1) San Diego
2) San Francisco
3) Giants game 1
4) Philadelphia game 2
5) Kansas City
6) Carolina

If your talking regular games that he won for us

1) Philadelphia game 1
2) Arizona
3) Detroit

Defeats he played poorly in

1) Seattle
2) Giants game 2

Defeats not his fault

1) Oakland
2) Washington game 1 and 2
3) Denver

Mule up jack***
 
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
I've been sitting here all year wondering why we've not played Henson, and why we're not getting rid of Henson.

Just a thought: Maybe Parcells is hiding Henson on the roster so to speak. He might be the one being groomed to take over, and BP/JJ wants to keep the media away from him and the other teams until he's ready. And the best way to do that is to make him a third stringer.

I don't see the reason to keep him if you don't think he can get it done. Henson is our future QB IMO. (I reserve the right to change my opinion if things change this offseason as a fickle observer)
Maybe Parcells doesn't want anybody on the bench that can cause any sort of QB controversy.
 
Quincy Carter went 10-6 2 season ago. Drew Bledsoe could go 10-6 or 9-7 with a BETTER DEFENSE !!!!!!! Yeah OUTSTANDING !!!!! LOL !!!

OWNED !!!!!!

:lmao2:

DBoys said:
Say what you want but without Bledsoe this year we would of been lucky to win 5 games. Then you would be saying the same thing about Romo or Henson.
 
mally said:
Quincy Carter went 10-6 2 season ago. Drew Bledsoe could go 10-6 or 9-7 with a BETTER DEFENSE !!!!!!! Yeah OUTSTANDING !!!!! LOL !!!

OWNED !!!!!!
and better running backs, receivers, tight ends. Strange how things work out sometimes.
 
jimmy40 said:
Maybe Parcells doesn't want anybody on the bench that can cause any sort of QB controversy.
You think he would chose that scenario over winning? Meaning, he would risk putting some sorry player behind Bledsoe ( who could go down at anytime with this sorry oline ). Maybe, maybe not.
 
Nors agrees

Bledsoe has elevated our chances to take a team to the next level. One more year of BP/JI drafting and we may be there.....
 
Imagine where we would be sitting right now, if our kicking game had been solid all year. How about with a running game. 12-3 sound about right.

To put everything at fault in Bledsoe's lap is just crazy. Without him at QB, there is no telling where we would be right now.
 
mally said:
Quincy Carter went 10-6 2 season ago. Drew Bledsoe could go 10-6 or 9-7 with a BETTER DEFENSE !!!!!!! Yeah OUTSTANDING !!!!! LOL !!!

OWNED !!!!!!

:lmao2:

Oh yeah QC put up number just like. Now what was that again oh yeah 21 ints and 17 TD pass. I see now how that compares to 22 TD and 15 ints of Bledsoe. Not to mention the offense scoring an average of 21 points on the season compared over the 17 points with Carter.
 
I dont know about that. Only tougher because of the way the Giants and skins were playing but we have a better defense now also and Philly was great in 2003. They sucked this year.



Nors said:
And our schedule was much tougher than our 2003 schedule.
 
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
You think he would chose that scenario over winning? Meaning, he would risk putting some sorry player behind Bledsoe ( who could go down at anytime with this sorry oline ). Maybe, maybe not.
Henson has thrown what? 10 passes? and Romo zero. How is that trying to win?
 
mally said:
Quincy Carter went 10-6 2 season ago. Drew Bledsoe could go 10-6 or 9-7 with a BETTER DEFENSE !!!!!!! Yeah OUTSTANDING !!!!! LOL !!!

OWNED !!!!!!

:lmao2:

Crackhead had a healthy OL and the number 1 defense in the NFL.
 
jimmy40 said:
Henson has thrown what? 10 passes? and Romo zero. How is that trying to win?
Parcells knows something about Romo/Henson we obviously don't know. What that is, I don't konw.

But I doubt Parcells would have trash to back up Bledsoe knowing what's on the line. And if Romo/Henson are trash, then shame on Parcells.
 
DBoys said:
Crackhead had a healthy OL and the number 1 defense in the NFL.

this the same #1 defense that parcells broke down and just put back this year???
 
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
Parcells knows something about Romo/Henson we obviously don't know. What that is, I don't konw.

But I doubt Parcells would have trash to back up Bledsoe knowing what's on the line. And if Romo/Henson are trash, then shame on Parcells.
I would say that if Bledsoe would have gone down Henson/Romo would have still been the backups.
 
jimmy40 said:
I would say that if Bledsoe would have gone down Henson/Romo would have still been the backups.
My point exactly, he knows 1 or both of those guys has something.
 
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
My point exactly, he knows 1 or both of those guys has something.
You missed my point, if Parcells wouldn't give up on a lost season you think he would have played one of them this year? I think Parcells arse puckered up when Vinny signed with the Jets. I think he would have dragged Simms out of the booth before Henson/Romo would have played.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,420
Messages
13,873,161
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top