Fuzzy Logic All-22 vs. NO version - Offense

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
When you can see the whole field you go in thinking that you will finally be able to understand what the offense and particular Tony Romo is doing. One thing about All-22 is that it is silent. It's a shot of the entire field but during the telecast they do a good job of giving audio presnap and we can hear Romo make Erhardt-Perkins (EP) audilbles, kill calls and the like. In the future I will try to take notes and reference that in the all-22 and see if I can figure anything out. As it is right now that is a huge hole in my understanding.

That is the thing about QB play, I don't know the play call. I can see the routes now but I don't know which one are option routes nor do I know what type of adjustments the scheme/playcall demands. As such I am fairly limited in what I can really say about how Romo performed and can do little better than what you see in the press. He does seem healthier and performing better under the current workout regimen. Like accuracy on his throws is much more consistent. You guys already knew that.

One thing that I am quickly beginning to realize is that just as much as the slow relay of the playcall before was an issue, Romo didn't adjust. I find myself criticizing him for taking so much time every snap anyway. Dealing with the world as it is and not the ideal that you want it to be is a maxim of mine.

Anyway that is a moot point now. Linehan is getting the playcall in quickly, Romo regularly has 20 or more seconds to make calls and adjustments and he uses them aplenty. People might want to see the no huddle but Romo prefers the Peyton Manning treatment. That's fine and I want to give the benefit of the doubt but I would be lying if moving forward that does not worry me. I still remember him checking out of a run to throw a hot route that got picked off by the corner against GB.

It's emotional and I get that but it is there just the same. OTOH, the interior line is doing a good job for the most part of providing a solid front for him to step into. I'll get more into that here later but it is allowing Romo to consistently see the field and able to step into his throws. Guys are also doing a good job staying on their feet so even when they get beat by a rush, Romo can play off them to reestablish blocks and escape.

His timing is also better. In the first game, he was off and you could tell as he pulled the ball down and looked uncertain and panicked. That is no more. He is making his reads and then getting the ball out quickly or sidestepping the rush in the flow of the snap. Just a much better flow to his performance from pass to pass.

Linehan likes to use 3 receivers on the open side. The open side is the side of the field towards the opposite hash where there is more room to operate as opposed to the near or closed side. He will bunch them or spread them out and then attack all over that side of the field. He does that with one deep route ie a go up the seam or post from outside to attack the middle of the field or a go outside and flag inside to attack the deep perimeter. Then behind those he runs curls, ins and outs at various depths. So for example he might motion Williams inside of Witten and Beasley and then run a go up the seam. This is a look that we ran the ball out of a lot to set up. Then Witten runs the 5 yard out that he has made a living on over his career and then Beasley on an in at 12 yards. This puts a ton of pressure on the defense. If the LB drops are at say 10 yards then it going to be very difficult to attack the throw to Witten at the depth of 5 yards. We've all seen the completions and Witten sidestepping LB/S that come up to try and tackle him. A shorter drop lets Beasley get behind them.

This is something that I will make a point of creating a few gif examples for people to look at but before that I encourage you to look on Sunday for the three receivers on the open side and check the routes that come out of them. See if you see what I am seeing and whether or not you agree.

Now after the fact, Romo said that Linehan does an excellent job of adjusting the depths so that is another thing I am going to be looking for. Not necessarily the same receivers but I want to see how the depths of the routes evolve over the game relative to the LB drops. This ladies and gentlemen is the chess match that we always hear about. I cannot wait to see more of it.

As for Linehan's contributions, I have seen people attribute it to playcalling quite often. I have poo-pooed that notion in the past but in fairness there is merit there. He does do a good job of presenting a look -think Williams motioning in tight to the formation- and then setting up an expectation. In this case it was a series of runs with some impressive blocks from Williams on LB. He will show that several times. He will then come back and run play action out of it shoot Williams up the seam past the LB who is looking for that run.

He does this with everything. He will stretch left and roll out right. He will show inside power to the strong side and then do a counter toss to the weak when they overload and so on. That is undoubtedly playcalling but it is also so much more than that. Game planning and execution (re: practice) play a huge part in this. it's not all about what we watch on gameday. A lot of this is built in the meeting room and on the practice field. As a matter of fact, I have been very impressed by the preparation of the offense and defense as opposed to previous years. Our guys know the schemes better and the coaches better prepared to make adjustments on the fly.

The maturation of Bryant is chronicled in the press and it's easy to see why. He gets a lot of attention from safeties over the top and LB trying to flash underneath. He was limited by the scheme yet continued to play hard despite limited opportunities. He has also done an admirable job with his conditioning since last week. i'm not sure if he is pacing himself better or what but we are not seeing the fourth quarter collapse in his endurance like we had previously. that 4th quarter fade off pa was a gutsy call but single coverage on one of the best WR in the NFL is a look that you strive for. Now if the running game can continue to get him single coverage outside then sign me up. It will be interesting to see if teams can adjust to our running attack without relaxing coverage on Dez. The Saints didn't come close.

Williams not only has avoided the sophomore slump but he has elevated his game. In the run game he was blocking at an elite level for a WR. Blocking down and snuffing out LB inline is impressive. The play design helped him a bit by having him on the move during the snap -a gif would be perfect here I know- but to sustain a block on an NFL linebacker at the poa is something that not but a handful of WR in the NFL can do consistently.

He has good deep speed which was helped by the playaction that look gave but what has impressed me most about Williams game is his quickness. Take his slant route for example. Single step to the outside with his outside foot, plant it, and then just explode back inside. His technique has always been good but he is coming out of his breaks better than he has before and its beating single coverage. He is winning on the in, drag, curl, fade, and seam to get a half dozen catches and a couple TDs. Not a bad day's work.

I would also add that Williams catch radius has expanded and he is attacking the football better. I have yet to see him really extend to make a catch outside his body but he is doing better in that regard. Holding onto the ball on that in in the EZ was straight money after he snatched the ball out of the air.

Dwayne Harris has had some tough sledding this year. The blocking on the punt returns leave a bit to be desired and most punts saw gunners and middle coverage winning battles and demanding fair catches. Linehan uses him similar to how he uses Dunbar and I like his potential in the role. What I mean is that his role is to attack the underneath coverage. Underneath throws like the curl, smoke or flare and get him in space. He remains elusive and looks like he is going to break one here sooner or later. They did finally get him the ball on the inside run/end around play they like to run but the Saints defender did a good job keeping outside contain forcing him to loop around him and scuttling the play.

The Bease did not enjoy an expanded role as he did against the Saints. With his quickness, double moves are devastating. While I describe Williams as explosive -Dez too for that matter- I describe Beasley's as sudden and his ability to stop and start is unparalleled on the roster. I want to see more in and ups that beat double teams. As it was we saw the short in and that was about it for the most part from Beasley this game. It remains his staple.

Street needs to attack the ball and go get it. He much like Williams last year needs to go get the football as NFL defenders will try to compete for the ball. Byrd did. It wasn't a particularly good throw from Romo - those throws outside and underneath can be an adventure sometimes- but i would like to see him do a better job there. He was kind of soft on a throw to him against SF as well. I hate soft players and he needs to step up. He needs the Woicik treatment in a bad way.

Witten is just tremendous. I am not sure where to give credit with the coaches but all our guys ability to reach blocks in space is simply tremendous. You see the technique of breaking down and moving into position to cut off pursuit out on the perimeter and it works. -I know a good spot for a gif- Cowboys pulled him over to the poa multiple times and it sprung Murray for a TD at one point. It's a technique you see our guys use on kickoff returns so I suspect Bissacia but at the same token they weren't blocking like that before Pope was here.

In the passing game he ran a string of deep ins and quick outs that the NO LB and S struggled to cover when he was not assisting on pass blocks like he was on the Dez TD. Haven't seen him run up the seam often to this point very often which in previous years has been a staple. I definitely get the impression that we have not begun to see all of the tricks Linehan has up his sleeve. Hasn't been as much of focal point in the red zone either as opposed to last year. Nevertheless a very productive day for the future HoF. Predictions of his demise are greatly exaggerated.

Backup TE is something to look at moving forward and I am curious if this game wasn't a bit of a signal towards more snaps for Escobar. Hanna started the game and continues to show consistency if not a ton of power in his blocks. He reaches and sustains his blocks well on S, LB, and DE alike. He does not drive or finish like a top inline blocker though. He is not out in routes but his consistency made Escobar's role this game a bit of surprise.

Escobar came in early and showed up with a catch on an in route. You will see the inline TE run a short in and then somebody in the slot run a deep in to give Romo a couple of crossing routes to choose from. Drag routes from outside WR and a deep in are another favorite to achieve this look but I digress. Anyway, Escobar continued to get a lot of snaps and his blocking was impressive. I watched Smith pass off Gallette on the edge to him in pass blocking and he again showed excellent technique sliding and using his hands to carry him upfield. The Saints covered him up with a S as opposed to the LB Hanna was seeing and while i wouldn't say that he dominated Byrd, he was able to sustain his block and allowed Murray to run right behind him. What really struck me is at the end of the game when we were looking to run out the clock, it was Escobar out there instead of Hanna. That speaks to a high degree of trust and I am curious to see if it carries over into more consistent playing time. I know that he dinged his shoulder in PS and looking at practice photos, he has a wrap on his knee but he is doing a very solid job as a complete TE.

Smith dominated Gallette and added him to the list as yet another guy he had giving up on rushes. The telecast did a great job demonstrating the power of his punch but he is lightning fast when setting up on the snap. He straight pancaked Gallettes spin move. In the run game he blew up Gallette, blocked down on what was a long day for Cam Jordan and was one of four Cowboys OL that were dominant in the second level. I haven't watched a whole heck of a lot of LT but to this point he's outplayed Jake Long and Joe Staley that I have seen and Long had a good game against Mincey. He is looking like an all pro.

Leary whiffed on a move Bunkley put on him early and let him tackle Murray for no gain but he spent most of the afternoon destroying Cam Jordan who at the end of the game was being pissy and trying to start a fight. He does a pretty good job on the second level but his feet are the weakness to his game. His punch is devastating but if he lets a guy stack onto his pads or get inside them, they can get some push as Bunkley and Jordan managed to do once each. At the same time he is doing a much more consistent job reaching his blocks and you are not seeing the brainfart whiffs that you have in the past. I don't know how much more of a ceiling that he has but to this point he has developed himself into a solid pro. Maybe he can get stronger in the lower body and improve the anchor a bit.

Fred is a rock in the middle and sets up and anchors better than any Cowboys C I have ever seen. Stepnoski, Donaldson, and Gurode all went to the probowl but none have been better. OTOH, his ability in space on the second level is tremendous for a man of his size and power. He has taken over the role Bernadeau had last year where he would help set up blocks and move to the second level.

-insert GIF here-

Now he is the one securing Bunkley for Leary or Martin and then blowing up a LB. Lofton has to be having nightmares about him. Watching him run downfield on screen plays makes me wonder exactly how he ran a 5.61 40 or a 3 cone of almost 8 seconds. Between that and the 21 reps on the bench i question how seriously he treated the combine. His performance in Indianapolis is not commensurate with what I saw last Sunday. He looks very athletic.

Not as athletic as Martin though. One stretch left saw Bunkley lined up on the weakside A gap opposite Martin and get off the ball well, moving away from Martin. Because of that Frederick could not get more than a measly out of position push to slow him down. No matter for Martin who almost overran the block and sealed off the pursuit. Now I get that Bunkley is not the fastest bloke out there but the only other guy I have seen do that type of move and reach it is Smith. It's also amusing guys snap back when he hits them with his punch. Hicks was visibly jarred a couple of times.

the criticism is in dealing with line stunts. the DT or DE crashes Free who turns in to pick him up while the OLD/DE loops around to try and hit the far A gap off of Fred. In order to counter this, Martin has to be quick to turn and pick up Freds man or he cannot stop the A gap penetration. Martin will be a beat slow from time to time and that is all it takes. Romo still makes his oline look better though and Zack owes him a steak dinner or the like. Murray also will help clean this type of thing up but enough pass rushers and you are essentially a man down.

NO is a good matchup for free as they do not have a whole lot of talent of the strongside edge. He showed nice lower body power driving Hicks and Haralsen backwards. I don't know if Doug has small hands or what but the disparity between the power in his legs and that of his punch is marked. He can push but just cannot hold on very well against stronger players. When he can move his feet it doesn't matter though. The bad steps that he was taking a couple of years ago are a thing of the past. Solid game from Free.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
Realized that I left out the RB. Not really much to add over the media narrative. Murray not fumbling is nice and he presses the gap before bouncing it outside very well. Does a good job waiting for the LB to commit while at the same time staying off the line enough to evade. Wasn't an issue in this game but I still maintain his hands are only average.

Dunbar had a really nice blitz pickup on a much bigger player and stoned him. Also held onto the ball after a big hit after catching the ball on a curl. He needs to continue to do this but early signs are encouraging. With all the extra guys crowding underneath there is not a lot of room underneath for his game.

Randle makes up for what he lacks in size with a powerful leg drive; limited opportunities to this point as Linehan feels out the possibilities the front line guys provide.
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,526
Reaction score
29,874
Linehan likes to use 3 receivers on the open side. The open side is the side of the field towards the opposite hash where there is more room to operate as opposed to the near or closed side. He will bunch them or spread them out and then attack all over that side of the field. He does that with one deep route ie a go up the seam or post from outside to attack the middle of the field or a go outside and flag inside to attack the deep perimeter. Then behind those he runs curls, ins and outs at various depths. So for example he might motion Williams inside of Witten and Beasley and then run a go up the seam. This is a look that we ran the ball out of a lot to set up. Then Witten runs the 5 yard out that he has made a living on over his career and then Beasley on an in at 12 yards. This puts a ton of pressure on the defense. If the LB drops are at say 10 yards then it going to be very difficult to attack the throw to Witten at the depth of 5 yards. We've all seen the completions and Witten sidestepping LB/S that come up to try and tackle him. A shorter drop lets Beasley get behind them.

Agree with bold and the rest of the paragraph supports this. A big reason why the offense has been so productive. This also lets mismatches arise natuarlly IMO, or find the weak spots just just by correctly running the offense.

As for Linehan's contributions, I have seen people attribute it to playcalling quite often. I have poo-pooed that notion in the past but in fairness there is merit there. He does do a good job of presenting a look -think Williams motioning in tight to the formation- and then setting up an expectation. In this case it was a series of runs with some impressive blocks from Williams on LB. He will show that several times. He will then come back and run play action out of it shoot Williams up the seam past the LB who is looking for that run.

I have already given Linehan credit for improving the play calling, but I have been most pleasantly surprised by him not being pass happy like he was in Detroit and having the discipline to stick to the run just so opposing DCs have to earn their money.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
Great job Fuzz - quick question, in the All 22 do you see opportunities for deep balls, especially off play action?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
Great job Fuzz - quick question, in the All 22 do you see opportunities for deep balls, especially off play action?

The TD to Dez and the second TD to Williams were both off playaction that resulted in single coverage. Linehan also likes to motion Harris and Williams inside and then run them up the seam out of a PA look.

In short, yes.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
If you want to see excellent TE blocking, go look at about 9:40 in the first quarter. 3 TEs, all blocking their brains out, busting Murray for a big gain to about the 5. Good stuff.
 

itsaboat

Well-Known Member
Messages
497
Reaction score
1,956
I would also add that Williams catch radius has expanded and he is attacking the football better. I have yet to see him really extend to make a catch outside his body but he is doing better in that regard. Holding onto the ball on that in in the EZ was straight money after he snatched the ball out of the air.

I thought Williams did a nice job plucking the ball out of the air on this play.

ThornyClearcutComet.gif
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,144
Reaction score
20,600
If you want to see excellent TE blocking, go look at about 9:40 in the first quarter. 3 TEs, all blocking their brains out, busting Murray for a big gain to about the 5. Good stuff.

I've posted before that Hanna has to be the one of the most improve player this year. Especially in blocking. If you go back and watch last year's game against the Saints and compare to this years game, it's like night and day.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
When you can see the whole field you go in thinking that you will finally be able to understand what the offense and particular Tony Romo is doing. One thing that I am quickly beginning to realize is that just as much as the slow relay of the playcall before was an issue, Romo didn't adjust. I find myself criticizing him for taking so much time every snap anyway.

First off I'd like to say thank-you (And to the others who do this) for taking their time and sharing it with us. I want to try a different approach here in my critique of our beloved franchise qb, one in which I don't come across as a "Hater," but as an objective Fan who realizes there are circumstances in a game that we might not be able to see without the benefit of going back and reviewing the All-22 film. My position on Romo has been misrepresented so much by blind homers and the overly positive pom pom crowd, that I'd like to set the record straight once and for all. (Take a deep breath folks, count to 20.)

A forum should involve Both positive as well as negative critique for the sake of sound discussion, ie balance. As fans we all just want to win and some of us get passionate about different things and we all see different things in the game. Some fans rag on the defense and other fans rag on the offense. I believe Romo has limitations as a passer and is not worthy of the contract he received, and I also believe his contract has hurt the team in other areas of need, such as defense and specifically the pass rush. My concern is and has been towards the future of this franchise, and that we might not have the funds/cap space/leverage to resign a lot of our best players next season unless Romo (Like other greats before him,) gives some money back, but I digress (Let's not get off topic here.)
Cliff Notes: Romo is "Good" but not "Great" and he is not truly the "Elite QB" like most fans apologetically protest but let's look at the film for answers.

My question to you and anyone who else who watches the 22-film is: Did you notice the four poor passes by Romo that could have Possibly been four TD's if thrown better? Maybe this is just nitpicking (Realizing we won in great fashion but my concern is really about when we face greater competition and we need better performance in a tighter game,) however I seem to recall two bad passes to Dez, one over and one underthrown, then one underthrown pass to T-will, and lastly that one late slow pass to Street. So giving Romo the benefit of the doubt because aside from those 4 big plays, there were a few others here and there but not quite as big a deal, he does seem to be playing better.

My next question is: Was he hit during the pass attempt, did he just not have the room or opportunity to plant before the throw, was he avoiding pressure, or was there some other unknown factor? Example: In the prior game in the last minutes we were facing 3rd and short and Romo threw a very bad pass to Dunbar that was so off, Dunbar didn't have a chance to even get his finger tips on it. At the last second a defensive lineman jumped up and it appeared he got his hands up high enough to obstruct Romo's view which more than likely was the reason for such a bad pass. (See I can be objective.) And just like you, I wish Romo would change it up and snap the ball early or at different intervals. Waiting to the last second has been so predictable that we are often losing the element of surprise and all that comes with it. Also doing the kill kill kill drill with seconds left on the clock has proven to be dangerous (Like that fumbled snap for instance.) Again nitpicking for the sake of sound objective discussion. It's ALL ABOUT THE WIN and what it takes to get there..

Maybe in the future when somebody watches the All-22 film, said individual can critique or illustrate Romo's 5 Best and 5 Worst Passes in each game, and then go into detail why or why not it was or wasn't on Romo. This type of information might shed some light on the "Haters" and "Homers" point of view for the one "Elite QB" who has needed so much defending thru his illustrious stat padding big game losing career. In short my conclusion is that in the past we have won a lot of games (Against inferior) teams because Romo has made awesome plays but we've also lost a lot of games (Against superior teams) due to poor performance by our qb, as well as the team as a whole. While I realize it's not entirely "Fair" to blame the QB for a loss, no other position impacts the outcome of a game as much as the qb position does but that's why QB's typically get paid so much more than everyone else. When facing superior competition, every single play is that much more crucial, the game is much much tighter, you need your stars to shine their brightest, and that's why as objective fans we nitpick after every win and especially every loss. (Again let's not get derailed here, let's just look to the film for answers.)
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
I have already given Linehan credit for improving the play calling, but I have been most pleasantly surprised by him not being pass happy like he was in Detroit and having the discipline to stick to the run just so opposing DCs have to earn their money.

Linehan is good at knowing his players...he isnt going to run this offense like he did detroit...we dont have bush + megatron
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
First off I'd like to say thank-you (And to the others who do this) for taking their time and sharing it with us. I want to try a different approach here in my critique of our beloved franchise qb, one in which I don't come across as a "Hater," but as an objective Fan who realizes there are circumstances in a game that we might not be able to see without the benefit of going back and reviewing the All-22 film. My position on Romo has been misrepresented so much by blind homers and the overly positive pom pom crowd, that I'd like to set the record straight once and for all. (Take a deep breath folks, count to 20.)

A forum should involve Both positive as well as negative critique for the sake of sound discussion, ie balance. As fans we all just want to win and some of us get passionate about different things and we all see different things in the game. Some fans rag on the defense and other fans rag on the offense. I believe Romo has limitations as a passer and is not worthy of the contract he received, and I also believe his contract has hurt the team in other areas of need, such as defense and specifically the pass rush. My concern is and has been towards the future of this franchise, and that we might not have the funds/cap space/leverage to resign a lot of our best players next season unless Romo (Like other greats before him,) gives some money back, but I digress (Let's not get off topic here.)
Cliff Notes: Romo is "Good" but not "Great" and he is not truly the "Elite QB" like most fans apologetically protest but let's look at the film for answers.

My question to you and anyone who else who watches the 22-film is: Did you notice the four poor passes by Romo that could have Possibly been four TD's if thrown better? Maybe this is just nitpicking (Realizing we won in great fashion but my concern is really about when we face greater competition and we need better performance in a tighter game,) however I seem to recall two bad passes to Dez, one over and one underthrown, then one underthrown pass to T-will, and lastly that one late slow pass to Street. So giving Romo the benefit of the doubt because aside from those 4 big plays, there were a few others here and there but not quite as big a deal, he does seem to be playing better.

My next question is: Was he hit during the pass attempt, did he just not have the room or opportunity to plant before the throw, was he avoiding pressure, or was there some other unknown factor? Example: In the prior game in the last minutes we were facing 3rd and short and Romo threw a very bad pass to Dunbar that was so off, Dunbar didn't have a chance to even get his finger tips on it. At the last second a defensive lineman jumped up and it appeared he got his hands up high enough to obstruct Romo's view which more than likely was the reason for such a bad pass. (See I can be objective.) And just like you, I wish Romo would change it up and snap the ball early or at different intervals. Waiting to the last second has been so predictable that we are often losing the element of surprise and all that comes with it. Also doing the kill kill kill drill with seconds left on the clock has proven to be dangerous (Like that fumbled snap for instance.) Again nitpicking for the sake of sound objective discussion. It's ALL ABOUT THE WIN and what it takes to get there..

Maybe in the future when somebody watches the All-22 film, said individual can critique or illustrate Romo's 5 Best and 5 Worst Passes in each game, and then go into detail why or why not it was or wasn't on Romo. This type of information might shed some light on the "Haters" and "Homers" point of view for the one "Elite QB" who has needed so much defending thru his illustrious stat padding big game losing career. In short my conclusion is that in the past we have won a lot of games (Against inferior) teams because Romo has made awesome plays but we've also lost a lot of games (Against superior teams) due to poor performance by our qb, as well as the team as a whole. While I realize it's not entirely "Fair" to blame the QB for a loss, no other position impacts the outcome of a game as much as the qb position does but that's why QB's typically get paid so much more than everyone else. When facing superior competition, every single play is that much more crucial, the game is much much tighter, you need your stars to shine their brightest, and that's why as objective fans we nitpick after every win and especially every loss. (Again let's not get derailed here, let's just look to the film for answers.)

I will try to be a succinct as possible here and try not to derail what Fuzzy has done. Yes I respect your knowledge, yes I have vehemently disagreed with you on Romo and yes I have even defended you r knowledge in a post to another poster while still disagreeing. I respect your passion for the team and I would love to sit next to you at a game. We would probably get along great - That being said I will stay on point here with just two points--

1. The innate bias with Romo comes in shadows, much like the national media will do. Just the simple line of "...our beloved quarterback" is inherantly a cheap shot, otherwise you would have just said "Tony Romo." Everything counts in making an argument and a subliminal reference like that hurts your position.

2. When you point out some throws or ask for analysis from Fuzzy on "five good or bad throws per game" based on the All 22, you can nitpick every single quarterback in the league on five throws. I ran into a Steelers fan who started in on me on Romo the other day and I asked him what happened to Roethlisberger the last time he played Dallas. Of course he didn't remember but he threw a game ending pick to Brandon Carr, game over. A Super Bowl quarterback who won one with a 26 passer rating. The guy slinked away mumbling some insult because he wasn't prepared to accept that it happened to his quarterback after all - Tony Romo was too easy for him and there...is the slippery slope.

Brady has flat out sucked this season, Eli has for the past two, Matt Ryan as had TWO 14-2 teams in the playoffs and did not win a playoff game with either team. The standards you have internally set for Romo as a fan with the surrounding talent he has had are historically unrealistic and all you need to do is look up Percy's posts to verify it. But I will end with this just in case you didn't know- courtesy of Percy-

In December and January games since 2009, Romo has a 100+ rating 12 times. The Cowboys are 6-6 in those games.

During that time, when Peyton Manning, Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Rivers, Flacco, Smith, Dalton, Schaub, and Kaepernick go over 100+ in December and January, those 10 quarterbacks have combined to lose 6 games.


Their teams are 104-6.

If you in any way try try to spin that on Romo then you've lost reasonable people. It's posts like that that chase Romo haters away because it is so utterly astounding it leaves no room for debate. They never post in a Percy thread.

Tony sucked against the 49ers. A lot of posters flat out said it including me, but just some advice - credit where credit due in any win where Romo plays well buys you credibility in future debates.

Finding bad throws in a win over a Saints team that many thought was a Super Bowl favorite does not.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
First off I'd like to say thank-you (And to the others who do this) for taking their time and sharing it with us. I want to try a different approach here in my critique of our beloved franchise qb, one in which I don't come across as a "Hater," but as an objective Fan who realizes there are circumstances in a game that we might not be able to see without the benefit of going back and reviewing the All-22 film. My position on Romo has been misrepresented so much by blind homers and the overly positive pom pom crowd, that I'd like to set the record straight once and for all. (Take a deep breath folks, count to 20.)

A forum should involve Both positive as well as negative critique for the sake of sound discussion, ie balance. As fans we all just want to win and some of us get passionate about different things and we all see different things in the game. Some fans rag on the defense and other fans rag on the offense. I believe Romo has limitations as a passer and is not worthy of the contract he received, and I also believe his contract has hurt the team in other areas of need, such as defense and specifically the pass rush. My concern is and has been towards the future of this franchise, and that we might not have the funds/cap space/leverage to resign a lot of our best players next season unless Romo (Like other greats before him,) gives some money back, but I digress (Let's not get off topic here.)
Cliff Notes: Romo is "Good" but not "Great" and he is not truly the "Elite QB" like most fans apologetically protest but let's look at the film for answers.

My question to you and anyone who else who watches the 22-film is: Did you notice the four poor passes by Romo that could have Possibly been four TD's if thrown better? Maybe this is just nitpicking (Realizing we won in great fashion but my concern is really about when we face greater competition and we need better performance in a tighter game,) however I seem to recall two bad passes to Dez, one over and one underthrown, then one underthrown pass to T-will, and lastly that one late slow pass to Street. So giving Romo the benefit of the doubt because aside from those 4 big plays, there were a few others here and there but not quite as big a deal, he does seem to be playing better.

My next question is: Was he hit during the pass attempt, did he just not have the room or opportunity to plant before the throw, was he avoiding pressure, or was there some other unknown factor? Example: In the prior game in the last minutes we were facing 3rd and short and Romo threw a very bad pass to Dunbar that was so off, Dunbar didn't have a chance to even get his finger tips on it. At the last second a defensive lineman jumped up and it appeared he got his hands up high enough to obstruct Romo's view which more than likely was the reason for such a bad pass. (See I can be objective.) And just like you, I wish Romo would change it up and snap the ball early or at different intervals. Waiting to the last second has been so predictable that we are often losing the element of surprise and all that comes with it. Also doing the kill kill kill drill with seconds left on the clock has proven to be dangerous (Like that fumbled snap for instance.) Again nitpicking for the sake of sound objective discussion. It's ALL ABOUT THE WIN and what it takes to get there..

Maybe in the future when somebody watches the All-22 film, said individual can critique or illustrate Romo's 5 Best and 5 Worst Passes in each game, and then go into detail why or why not it was or wasn't on Romo. This type of information might shed some light on the "Haters" and "Homers" point of view for the one "Elite QB" who has needed so much defending thru his illustrious stat padding big game losing career. In short my conclusion is that in the past we have won a lot of games (Against inferior) teams because Romo has made awesome plays but we've also lost a lot of games (Against superior teams) due to poor performance by our qb, as well as the team as a whole. While I realize it's not entirely "Fair" to blame the QB for a loss, no other position impacts the outcome of a game as much as the qb position does but that's why QB's typically get paid so much more than everyone else. When facing superior competition, every single play is that much more crucial, the game is much much tighter, you need your stars to shine their brightest, and that's why as objective fans we nitpick after every win and especially every loss. (Again let's not get derailed here, let's just look to the film for answers.)

I recall the Williams throw to the post. It was single coverage but he was right there with Williams. In situations like that QBs have to try and fit throws and he missed.

I'm interested in plays of significance and not really a quota of good versus bad plays. I try and point out examples of both. In fairness though one has to consider that no QB in the league has a 100% completion percentage. As such you need to look at efficiency. For example, when he is missing throws is he erring on the side of throwing the receiver open or is it a bad throw that forces the WR to play defense? Your approach seems to assume a conclusion ie that he is going to have so many 'good' throws and so many 'bad.' I just take it as it comes.

I felt that while he missed some throws, he for the most part was accurate and he didn't throw balls that were in extra danger of being picked off. Moreso, I look to the decisions he makes. In the first game he threw into double and triple coverage. I felt this time around he did an excellent job going away from double coverage and finding the open or single covered receiver. He did a pretty good job spreading the ball around.
 

Macnalty

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
2,162
First off I'd like to say thank-you (And to the others who do this) for taking their time and sharing it with us. I want to try a different approach here in my critique of our beloved franchise qb, one in which I don't come across as a "Hater," but as an objective Fan who realizes there are circumstances in a game that we might not be able to see without the benefit of going back and reviewing the All-22 film. My position on Romo has been misrepresented so much by blind homers and the overly positive pom pom crowd, that I'd like to set the record straight once and for all. (Take a deep breath folks, count to 20.)

A forum should involve Both positive as well as negative critique for the sake of sound discussion, ie balance. As fans we all just want to win and some of us get passionate about different things and we all see different things in the game. Some fans rag on the defense and other fans rag on the offense. I believe Romo has limitations as a passer and is not worthy of the contract he received, and I also believe his contract has hurt the team in other areas of need, such as defense and specifically the pass rush. My concern is and has been towards the future of this franchise, and that we might not have the funds/cap space/leverage to resign a lot of our best players next season unless Romo (Like other greats before him,) gives some money back, but I digress (Let's not get off topic here.)
Cliff Notes: Romo is "Good" but not "Great" and he is not truly the "Elite QB" like most fans apologetically protest but let's look at the film for answers.

My question to you and anyone who else who watches the 22-film is: Did you notice the four poor passes by Romo that could have Possibly been four TD's if thrown better? Maybe this is just nitpicking (Realizing we won in great fashion but my concern is really about when we face greater competition and we need better performance in a tighter game,) however I seem to recall two bad passes to Dez, one over and one underthrown, then one underthrown pass to T-will, and lastly that one late slow pass to Street. So giving Romo the benefit of the doubt because aside from those 4 big plays, there were a few others here and there but not quite as big a deal, he does seem to be playing better.

My next question is: Was he hit during the pass attempt, did he just not have the room or opportunity to plant before the throw, was he avoiding pressure, or was there some other unknown factor? Example: In the prior game in the last minutes we were facing 3rd and short and Romo threw a very bad pass to Dunbar that was so off, Dunbar didn't have a chance to even get his finger tips on it. At the last second a defensive lineman jumped up and it appeared he got his hands up high enough to obstruct Romo's view which more than likely was the reason for such a bad pass. (See I can be objective.) And just like you, I wish Romo would change it up and snap the ball early or at different intervals. Waiting to the last second has been so predictable that we are often losing the element of surprise and all that comes with it. Also doing the kill kill kill drill with seconds left on the clock has proven to be dangerous (Like that fumbled snap for instance.) Again nitpicking for the sake of sound objective discussion. It's ALL ABOUT THE WIN and what it takes to get there..

Maybe in the future when somebody watches the All-22 film, said individual can critique or illustrate Romo's 5 Best and 5 Worst Passes in each game, and then go into detail why or why not it was or wasn't on Romo. This type of information might shed some light on the "Haters" and "Homers" point of view for the one "Elite QB" who has needed so much defending thru his illustrious stat padding big game losing career. In short my conclusion is that in the past we have won a lot of games (Against inferior) teams because Romo has made awesome plays but we've also lost a lot of games (Against superior teams) due to poor performance by our qb, as well as the team as a whole. While I realize it's not entirely "Fair" to blame the QB for a loss, no other position impacts the outcome of a game as much as the qb position does but that's why QB's typically get paid so much more than everyone else. When facing superior competition, every single play is that much more crucial, the game is much much tighter, you need your stars to shine their brightest, and that's why as objective fans we nitpick after every win and especially every loss. (Again let's not get derailed here, let's just look to the film for answers.)

This Oline is not good enough to provide the protection for the precision/accuracy you think is necessary for Tony(at his point in his recovery from back surgery) to be elite/great. He is going to have some trouble until he finds the edges of this back injury and knows how he will respond. Like me you have no choice but to either enjoy the ride or critique every move hope you do not miss the fun this team is providing after all these years.
Not in agreement with you about the QB money situation, we were stuck and we paid market value for him, it is a large part of the budget, all teams with a decent QB will be strapped with the same financial hit. I am in agreement it would be much better if Tony just played for league minimum just to be a cowboy.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
When you can see the whole field you go in thinking that you will finally be able to understand what the offense and particular Tony Romo is doing. One thing about All-22 is that it is silent. It's a shot of the entire field but during the telecast they do a good job of giving audio presnap and we can hear Romo make Erhardt-Perkins (EP) audilbles, kill calls and the like. In the future I will try to take notes and reference that in the all-22 and see if I can figure anything out. As it is right now that is a huge hole in my understanding.

That is the thing about QB play, I don't know the play call. I can see the routes now but I don't know which one are option routes nor do I know what type of adjustments the scheme/playcall demands. As such I am fairly limited in what I can really say about how Romo performed and can do little better than what you see in the press. He does seem healthier and performing better under the current workout regimen. Like accuracy on his throws is much more consistent. You guys already knew that.

One thing that I am quickly beginning to realize is that just as much as the slow relay of the playcall before was an issue, Romo didn't adjust. I find myself criticizing him for taking so much time every snap anyway. Dealing with the world as it is and not the ideal that you want it to be is a maxim of mine.

Anyway that is a moot point now. Linehan is getting the playcall in quickly, Romo regularly has 20 or more seconds to make calls and adjustments and he uses them aplenty. People might want to see the no huddle but Romo prefers the Peyton Manning treatment. That's fine and I want to give the benefit of the doubt but I would be lying if moving forward that does not worry me. I still remember him checking out of a run to throw a hot route that got picked off by the corner against GB.

It's emotional and I get that but it is there just the same. OTOH, the interior line is doing a good job for the most part of providing a solid front for him to step into. I'll get more into that here later but it is allowing Romo to consistently see the field and able to step into his throws. Guys are also doing a good job staying on their feet so even when they get beat by a rush, Romo can play off them to reestablish blocks and escape.

His timing is also better. In the first game, he was off and you could tell as he pulled the ball down and looked uncertain and panicked. That is no more. He is making his reads and then getting the ball out quickly or sidestepping the rush in the flow of the snap. Just a much better flow to his performance from pass to pass.

Linehan likes to use 3 receivers on the open side. The open side is the side of the field towards the opposite hash where there is more room to operate as opposed to the near or closed side. He will bunch them or spread them out and then attack all over that side of the field. He does that with one deep route ie a go up the seam or post from outside to attack the middle of the field or a go outside and flag inside to attack the deep perimeter. Then behind those he runs curls, ins and outs at various depths. So for example he might motion Williams inside of Witten and Beasley and then run a go up the seam. This is a look that we ran the ball out of a lot to set up. Then Witten runs the 5 yard out that he has made a living on over his career and then Beasley on an in at 12 yards. This puts a ton of pressure on the defense. If the LB drops are at say 10 yards then it going to be very difficult to attack the throw to Witten at the depth of 5 yards. We've all seen the completions and Witten sidestepping LB/S that come up to try and tackle him. A shorter drop lets Beasley get behind them.

This is something that I will make a point of creating a few gif examples for people to look at but before that I encourage you to look on Sunday for the three receivers on the open side and check the routes that come out of them. See if you see what I am seeing and whether or not you agree.

Now after the fact, Romo said that Linehan does an excellent job of adjusting the depths so that is another thing I am going to be looking for. Not necessarily the same receivers but I want to see how the depths of the routes evolve over the game relative to the LB drops. This ladies and gentlemen is the chess match that we always hear about. I cannot wait to see more of it.

As for Linehan's contributions, I have seen people attribute it to playcalling quite often. I have poo-pooed that notion in the past but in fairness there is merit there. He does do a good job of presenting a look -think Williams motioning in tight to the formation- and then setting up an expectation. In this case it was a series of runs with some impressive blocks from Williams on LB. He will show that several times. He will then come back and run play action out of it shoot Williams up the seam past the LB who is looking for that run.

He does this with everything. He will stretch left and roll out right. He will show inside power to the strong side and then do a counter toss to the weak when they overload and so on. That is undoubtedly playcalling but it is also so much more than that. Game planning and execution (re: practice) play a huge part in this. it's not all about what we watch on gameday. A lot of this is built in the meeting room and on the practice field. As a matter of fact, I have been very impressed by the preparation of the offense and defense as opposed to previous years. Our guys know the schemes better and the coaches better prepared to make adjustments on the fly.

The maturation of Bryant is chronicled in the press and it's easy to see why. He gets a lot of attention from safeties over the top and LB trying to flash underneath. He was limited by the scheme yet continued to play hard despite limited opportunities. He has also done an admirable job with his conditioning since last week. i'm not sure if he is pacing himself better or what but we are not seeing the fourth quarter collapse in his endurance like we had previously. that 4th quarter fade off pa was a gutsy call but single coverage on one of the best WR in the NFL is a look that you strive for. Now if the running game can continue to get him single coverage outside then sign me up. It will be interesting to see if teams can adjust to our running attack without relaxing coverage on Dez. The Saints didn't come close.

Williams not only has avoided the sophomore slump but he has elevated his game. In the run game he was blocking at an elite level for a WR. Blocking down and snuffing out LB inline is impressive. The play design helped him a bit by having him on the move during the snap -a gif would be perfect here I know- but to sustain a block on an NFL linebacker at the poa is something that not but a handful of WR in the NFL can do consistently.

He has good deep speed which was helped by the playaction that look gave but what has impressed me most about Williams game is his quickness. Take his slant route for example. Single step to the outside with his outside foot, plant it, and then just explode back inside. His technique has always been good but he is coming out of his breaks better than he has before and its beating single coverage. He is winning on the in, drag, curl, fade, and seam to get a half dozen catches and a couple TDs. Not a bad day's work.

I would also add that Williams catch radius has expanded and he is attacking the football better. I have yet to see him really extend to make a catch outside his body but he is doing better in that regard. Holding onto the ball on that in in the EZ was straight money after he snatched the ball out of the air.

Dwayne Harris has had some tough sledding this year. The blocking on the punt returns leave a bit to be desired and most punts saw gunners and middle coverage winning battles and demanding fair catches. Linehan uses him similar to how he uses Dunbar and I like his potential in the role. What I mean is that his role is to attack the underneath coverage. Underneath throws like the curl, smoke or flare and get him in space. He remains elusive and looks like he is going to break one here sooner or later. They did finally get him the ball on the inside run/end around play they like to run but the Saints defender did a good job keeping outside contain forcing him to loop around him and scuttling the play.

The Bease did not enjoy an expanded role as he did against the Saints. With his quickness, double moves are devastating. While I describe Williams as explosive -Dez too for that matter- I describe Beasley's as sudden and his ability to stop and start is unparalleled on the roster. I want to see more in and ups that beat double teams. As it was we saw the short in and that was about it for the most part from Beasley this game. It remains his staple.

Street needs to attack the ball and go get it. He much like Williams last year needs to go get the football as NFL defenders will try to compete for the ball. Byrd did. It wasn't a particularly good throw from Romo - those throws outside and underneath can be an adventure sometimes- but i would like to see him do a better job there. He was kind of soft on a throw to him against SF as well. I hate soft players and he needs to step up. He needs the Woicik treatment in a bad way.

Witten is just tremendous. I am not sure where to give credit with the coaches but all our guys ability to reach blocks in space is simply tremendous. You see the technique of breaking down and moving into position to cut off pursuit out on the perimeter and it works. -I know a good spot for a gif- Cowboys pulled him over to the poa multiple times and it sprung Murray for a TD at one point. It's a technique you see our guys use on kickoff returns so I suspect Bissacia but at the same token they weren't blocking like that before Pope was here.

In the passing game he ran a string of deep ins and quick outs that the NO LB and S struggled to cover when he was not assisting on pass blocks like he was on the Dez TD. Haven't seen him run up the seam often to this point very often which in previous years has been a staple. I definitely get the impression that we have not begun to see all of the tricks Linehan has up his sleeve. Hasn't been as much of focal point in the red zone either as opposed to last year. Nevertheless a very productive day for the future HoF. Predictions of his demise are greatly exaggerated.

Backup TE is something to look at moving forward and I am curious if this game wasn't a bit of a signal towards more snaps for Escobar. Hanna started the game and continues to show consistency if not a ton of power in his blocks. He reaches and sustains his blocks well on S, LB, and DE alike. He does not drive or finish like a top inline blocker though. He is not out in routes but his consistency made Escobar's role this game a bit of surprise.

Escobar came in early and showed up with a catch on an in route. You will see the inline TE run a short in and then somebody in the slot run a deep in to give Romo a couple of crossing routes to choose from. Drag routes from outside WR and a deep in are another favorite to achieve this look but I digress. Anyway, Escobar continued to get a lot of snaps and his blocking was impressive. I watched Smith pass off Gallette on the edge to him in pass blocking and he again showed excellent technique sliding and using his hands to carry him upfield. The Saints covered him up with a S as opposed to the LB Hanna was seeing and while i wouldn't say that he dominated Byrd, he was able to sustain his block and allowed Murray to run right behind him. What really struck me is at the end of the game when we were looking to run out the clock, it was Escobar out there instead of Hanna. That speaks to a high degree of trust and I am curious to see if it carries over into more consistent playing time. I know that he dinged his shoulder in PS and looking at practice photos, he has a wrap on his knee but he is doing a very solid job as a complete TE.

Smith dominated Gallette and added him to the list as yet another guy he had giving up on rushes. The telecast did a great job demonstrating the power of his punch but he is lightning fast when setting up on the snap. He straight pancaked Gallettes spin move. In the run game he blew up Gallette, blocked down on what was a long day for Cam Jordan and was one of four Cowboys OL that were dominant in the second level. I haven't watched a whole heck of a lot of LT but to this point he's outplayed Jake Long and Joe Staley that I have seen and Long had a good game against Mincey. He is looking like an all pro.

Leary whiffed on a move Bunkley put on him early and let him tackle Murray for no gain but he spent most of the afternoon destroying Cam Jordan who at the end of the game was being pissy and trying to start a fight. He does a pretty good job on the second level but his feet are the weakness to his game. His punch is devastating but if he lets a guy stack onto his pads or get inside them, they can get some push as Bunkley and Jordan managed to do once each. At the same time he is doing a much more consistent job reaching his blocks and you are not seeing the brainfart whiffs that you have in the past. I don't know how much more of a ceiling that he has but to this point he has developed himself into a solid pro. Maybe he can get stronger in the lower body and improve the anchor a bit.

Fred is a rock in the middle and sets up and anchors better than any Cowboys C I have ever seen. Stepnoski, Donaldson, and Gurode all went to the probowl but none have been better. OTOH, his ability in space on the second level is tremendous for a man of his size and power. He has taken over the role Bernadeau had last year where he would help set up blocks and move to the second level.

-insert GIF here-

Now he is the one securing Bunkley for Leary or Martin and then blowing up a LB. Lofton has to be having nightmares about him. Watching him run downfield on screen plays makes me wonder exactly how he ran a 5.61 40 or a 3 cone of almost 8 seconds. Between that and the 21 reps on the bench i question how seriously he treated the combine. His performance in Indianapolis is not commensurate with what I saw last Sunday. He looks very athletic.

Not as athletic as Martin though. One stretch left saw Bunkley lined up on the weakside A gap opposite Martin and get off the ball well, moving away from Martin. Because of that Frederick could not get more than a measly out of position push to slow him down. No matter for Martin who almost overran the block and sealed off the pursuit. Now I get that Bunkley is not the fastest bloke out there but the only other guy I have seen do that type of move and reach it is Smith. It's also amusing guys snap back when he hits them with his punch. Hicks was visibly jarred a couple of times.

the criticism is in dealing with line stunts. the DT or DE crashes Free who turns in to pick him up while the OLD/DE loops around to try and hit the far A gap off of Fred. In order to counter this, Martin has to be quick to turn and pick up Freds man or he cannot stop the A gap penetration. Martin will be a beat slow from time to time and that is all it takes. Romo still makes his oline look better though and Zack owes him a steak dinner or the like. Murray also will help clean this type of thing up but enough pass rushers and you are essentially a man down.

NO is a good matchup for free as they do not have a whole lot of talent of the strongside edge. He showed nice lower body power driving Hicks and Haralsen backwards. I don't know if Doug has small hands or what but the disparity between the power in his legs and that of his punch is marked. He can push but just cannot hold on very well against stronger players. When he can move his feet it doesn't matter though. The bad steps that he was taking a couple of years ago are a thing of the past. Solid game from Free.

Great analysis. I'm seeing the sames things but you do a much better job of putting it into words.

The blocking by Williams is one of the details that I've been noticing this season. Linehan also sets up some plays in a look where Williams has run blocked several times and will then pop him out on a route from that look which has had him wide open a couple of times this season.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
I will try to be a succinct as possible here and try not to derail what Fuzzy has done. Yes I respect your knowledge, yes I have vehemently disagreed with you on Romo and yes I have even defended you r knowledge in a post to another poster while still disagreeing. I respect your passion for the team and I would love to sit next to you at a game. We would probably get along great - That being said I will stay on point here with just two points--

1. The innate bias with Romo comes in shadows, much like the national media will do. Just the simple line of "...our beloved quarterback" is inherantly a cheap shot, otherwise you would have just said "Tony Romo." Everything counts in making an argument and a subliminal reference like that hurts your position.

2. When you point out some throws or ask for analysis from Fuzzy on "five good or bad throws per game" based on the All 22, you can nitpick every single quarterback in the league on five throws. I ran into a Steelers fan who started in on me on Romo the other day and I asked him what happened to Roethlisberger the last time he played Dallas. Of course he didn't remember but he threw a game ending pick to Brandon Carr, game over. A Super Bowl quarterback who won one with a 26 passer rating. The guy slinked away mumbling some insult because he wasn't prepared to accept that it happened to his quarterback after all - Tony Romo was too easy for him and there...is the slippery slope.

Brady has flat out sucked this season, Eli has for the past two, Matt Ryan as had TWO 14-2 teams in the playoffs and did not win a playoff game with either team. The standards you have internally set for Romo as a fan with the surrounding talent he has had are historically unrealistic and all you need to do is look up Percy's posts to verify it. But I will end with this just in case you didn't know- courtesy of Percy-

In December and January games since 2009, Romo has a 100+ rating 12 times. The Cowboys are 6-6 in those games.

During that time, when Peyton Manning, Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Rivers, Flacco, Smith, Dalton, Schaub, and Kaepernick go over 100+ in December and January, those 10 quarterbacks have combined to lose 6 games.


Their teams are 104-6.

If you in any way try try to spin that on Romo then you've lost reasonable people. It's posts like that that chase Romo haters away because it is so utterly astounding it leaves no room for debate. They never post in a Percy thread.

Tony sucked against the 49ers. A lot of posters flat out said it including me, but just some advice - credit where credit due in any win where Romo plays well buys you credibility in future debates.

Finding bad throws in a win over a Saints team that many thought was a Super Bowl favorite does not.

I'm sure we would have a great time rooting our team on, we are winning again. Romo has always had the benefit of really good talent on offense and thru the years he's had receivers who can catch the ball and run for 40+ yds. We haven't seen it this year yet but the previous seasons we did. I understand the numbers argument but to me it just doesn't translate to actual game time viewing because the numbers don't tell the entire story. And lastly I'm not looking for credibility or acceptance on a forum, I just post it the way I see it. Romo has limitations as a passer, especially now after this surgery. And I do give him credit for making plays but he doesn't make so often against superior teams...
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
This Oline is not good enough to provide the protection for the precision/accuracy you think is necessary for Tony(at his point in his recovery from back surgery) to be elite/great. He is going to have some trouble until he finds the edges of this back injury and knows how he will respond. Like me you have no choice but to either enjoy the ride or critique every move hope you do not miss the fun this team is providing after all these years.
Not in agreement with you about the QB money situation, we were stuck and we paid market value for him, it is a large part of the budget, all teams with a decent QB will be strapped with the same financial hit. I am in agreement it would be much better if Tony just played for league minimum just to be a cowboy.

I have grown to accept Romo for who he is and I enjoy the wins. It came to me when we had that major shootout with Denver, I said to myself this is who he is. I wasn't mad when he threw that final pick, I truly enjoyed the entire game and thought he played very well. Both defenses were depleted in that game though...
 
Top