TwentyOne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,673
- Reaction score
- 5,316
nyc;2399279 said:LOL, dude I'm just spewing meaningless ****.
You for sure do.
nyc;2399279 said:LOL, dude I'm just spewing meaningless ****.
wileedog;2399991 said:What a ridiculous strawman argument.
Parcells wil be in the HOF, and part of the reason why will be his ability to take a complete ruined franchise like Dallas was way back when and turn it into a team that even Wade Phillips could coach to 13-3.
Wade Philips will not be in the HOF, and one of the reasons why will be because he was handed a SB caliber team talent wise and has proceeded to systematically dismantle it.
I absolutely think Parcells was done on the sidelines, and that his best coaching years are behind him and he knew it. But Phillips hasn't proved anything here at all except a decent run early in the season last year with a 13 Pro Bowl player team that collapsed completely at the end. And is further imploding this year.
Dave_in-NC;2399994 said:You and your facts, will you ever learn?
shhh!CoCo;2400152 said:Whenever there is controversy in Dallas this site reminds me of the Salem witch trials.
:laugh2:
CoCo;2400140 said:And that bolded part is exactly my point.
I'm not disputing that Parcells, not Phillips, will be in the HOF? I'm not disputing Parcells significant role in rebuilding the talent of this organization.
Obviously (the reference to zero playoff wins) the comparison is Wade in Dallas vs Bill in Dallas as HC's. And your bolded statement agrees with me - Parcells wasn't the HC answer either.
I'm not defending Wade. He's justifiably on the hot seat.
I'm only saying it makes no sense to pine for Bill to return as HC or to use his time in Dallas as proof positive that "kicking butt" vs "we are family" was proven the superior coaching style. Your bolded statement confirms it.
CoCo;2400152 said:Whenever there is controversy in Dallas this site reminds me of the Salem witch trials.
:laugh2:
Chocolate Lab;2400198 said:It makes me think of the scene in Frankenstein with the townspeople marching up the hill with torches and pitchforks.
theebs;2400246 said:makes sense.
That bill parcells was mean, loud and did I mention from New Jersey.
He made them tackle and everything. Especially in 06, when he said I am going back to my old ways and running camp and practices the old way.
Good thing he is gone. And it is a good thing he is out of football, he was going to really hurt this league with his mean ways and arrogance.
superpunk;2400253 said:lol, also he told stories about former Giants. And that did not sit well...
Whenever there is controversy on this board, I tend to actually earn work harder on my real job.CoCo;2400152 said:Whenever there is controversy in Dallas this site reminds me of the Salem witch trials.
:laugh2:
nyc;2399279 said:LOL, dude I'm just spewing meaningless ****. Thats pretty much what this board consists of lately.
Hostile;2399313 said:In some ways this team needs to be worn down.
Mostly we need to get some guys healthy. If this bye week does not get Flozell back to par I would put Leonard Davis at LT and start Montrae Holland at RG for a week or two to give him time to heal. Hopefully Kosier is ready to recalim the LG spot.
Our O-line and Tony Romo are the keys to righting this ship.
Hostile;2399316 said:Parcells is extremely over rated by an angry fan group. Might as well be hollering for Chan Gailey to be brought back. They had just about equal results as far as wins and losses. I don't think clamoring for his return is wise either. Of course I never want to be retroactive, which is why I have never liked the bring back Jimmy ideas either. People simply can't move on.
wileedog;2399991 said:What a ridiculous strawman argument.
Parcells wil be in the HOF, and part of the reason why will be his ability to take a complete ruined franchise like Dallas was way back when and turn it into a team that even Wade Phillips could coach to 13-3.
Wade Philips will not be in the HOF, and one of the reasons why will be because he was handed a SB caliber team talent wise and has proceeded to systematically dismantle it.
I absolutely think Parcells was done on the sidelines, and that his best coaching years are behind him and he knew it. But Phillips hasn't proved anything here at all except a decent run early in the season last year with a 13 Pro Bowl player team that collapsed completely at the end. And is further imploding this year.
wileedog;2400188 said:And you are misunderstanding my point.
I'm not 'pining' for Bill to have stayed, although I think we would have been 1000x better off if he was the GM of Dallas and not Miami right now. Nor am I saying that Parcells the Dallas version was a brilliant Xs and O's guy who consistently outthunk the guy with the headsets on the other side. He didn't.
And neither does Wade. Or Garret so far for that matter.
But Parcells brought all of the other intangibles that a HC needs to bring. He wisely reshaped the organization, set the ground rules down and enforced them. Problem players were quickly moved. lack of effort like the Jenkins mishap were not tolerated. If the team didn't have natural locker room leaders, yes some of the older "Parcell's Guys" were brought in to help provide that (why this was seen as a negative I never understood).
He wasn't perfect by any stretch, but Wade brings NOTHING to the table except supposed knowledge of the 3-4, and now his lack of discipline is threatening to undo a lot of the GOOD things that Parcells accomplished here.
That's the point. Not anything to do with playoff wins, which makes no sense to use as a measuring stick because it ignores everything Bill DID do for this franchise vs. everything Wade hasn't and wont.
BraveHeartFan;2400301 said:The only other measurable that is accurate would be regular season record and in his one full season as HC Phillips had a better record than BP did.
InmanRoshi;2400325 said:Only because Wade got to inherit a full season of the All Pro QB that Parcells groomed.
We've seen what Wade and Garrett's team looks like without said quarterback the last 3 weeks. They ain't going to the playoffs without him, like Parcells did three separate times, they're coaching a team to the worst record in the NFL.
InmanRoshi;2400325 said:Only because Wade got to inherit a full season of the All Pro QB that Parcells groomed.
We've seen what Wade and Garrett's team looks like without said quarterback the last 3 weeks. And they ain't going to the playoffs without him, like Parcells did three seperate times. Quite the contrary, they've shown that if they don't have a Top 5 NFL quarterback to bail them out, they're coaching a team to the worst record in the NFL.
wileedog;2400188 said:And you are misunderstanding my point.
I'm not 'pining' for Bill to have stayed, although I think we would have been 1000x better off if he was the GM of Dallas and not Miami right now. Nor am I saying that Parcells the Dallas version was a brilliant Xs and O's guy who consistently outthunk the guy with the headsets on the other side. He didn't.
And neither does Wade. Or Garret so far for that matter.
But Parcells brought all of the other intangibles that a HC needs to bring. He wisely reshaped the organization, set the ground rules down and enforced them. Problem players were quickly moved. lack of effort like the Jenkins mishap were not tolerated. If the team didn't have natural locker room leaders, yes some of the older "Parcell's Guys" were brought in to help provide that (why this was seen as a negative I never understood).
He wasn't perfect by any stretch, but Wade brings NOTHING to the table except supposed knowledge of the 3-4, and now his lack of discipline is threatening to undo a lot of the GOOD things that Parcells accomplished here.
That's the point. Not anything to do with playoff wins, which makes no sense to use as a measuring stick because it ignores everything Bill DID do for this franchise vs. everything Wade hasn't and wont.
BraveHeartFan;2400346 said:3 times in 4 years? Really? Which three would that be?
First season 10-6... playoffs and WC loss.
Second season 6-10...no playoffs.
Third season 9-7...no playoffs as we faded down the stretch and cost ourselves the playoffs.
Fourth Season 9-7...made the playoffs after another late season fade and lost in the WC round again.
So, no, he didn't make it to the playoffs on three seperate occassions without Romo. He made it to the playoffs once without him, his first season here, and then once with him after he FINALLY put him in the starting lineup.
Is it Wade's fault that BP waited until nearly the half way point of the 06 season to put Romo in? No. BP did that to himself by going with Drew for that long.
If BP was here right now, instead of Wade, with all the same injuries and so forth we've went through the last month plus you'd be screaming for BP's head right now, just the same, cause we'd have still been the same 1-2 through that stretch without Romo.