Beast_from_East;2565619 said:
Wow, just wow.
First of all, we would be a 2-14 team without Romo so this statement that you want him released is laughable.
First of all i didn't write that i want him to be released. I wrote that i want him to be released when he plays the next season like the way he played this season. And if he shows the same attitude in front of the cameras and on the field i don't want him no more on this team.
Second i don't think we would be a 2-14 team without him but that's not a really important point. RW put it really good after - i think it was the Ravens game. 0-16 or 9-7 it doesn't matter we are all in the same boat and that's not in the playoffs. I will put this in my words: the only difference between Romo right now and a "virtual bad QB" is that Romo gives you hope for a winning season and the playoffs. But at the end of the season the result Romo or the bad QB gives you is exactly the same - no championship. And to me that's what counts.
But the really important point is the way we put hope in Romo the way we judged his talent and the way we paid him for that. This is not the league of brotherly love - this is the NFL where you get paid money and have to deliver. I will critic Romo as long as he doesn''t live up to what we pay him. And that's being a franchise QB a great QB and not a good one. I think we need a franchsie QB to win a championship if Romo is not one so why keep him and why for that amount of money ?
Romo had a great first season but when you judge players it's "what have you done for me lately". And face it Romo had a medicore season - even if the stats say else. He made alot of mistakes. He may have the talent but right now he is clearly on a downswing. I hope he will pick up his game again but right now i just don't see it if he doesn't change something in his attitude. And i really doubt he can do this without the right coach. I doubt Romo thinks the same way and that makes this thing scary for me.
Beast_from_East;2565619 said:
Secondly, QBs dont grow on trees. We went through 17 starting QBs between Aikman and Romo. You want to go through another 17 QBs if you release Romo until you find a QB that meets your satisfaction. And before you say draft one, remember that for each Matt Ryan there is a Ryan Leaf, Jeff George, David Klinger, Andre Ware, Tim Couch...............you starting to get the point???? (QBs bust more than any pick in the 1st round).
I did get the point but this is the wrong attitude. If you are afraid of old mistakes that they will repeat themself i hope you aren't in a position where you have to make decissions. Fear is the worst thing to follow when you have to decide. In my ecperience if you try to avoid something this thing will just haunt you all your life. But history doesn't repeat itself if you learn from your mistakes and change your approach.
Just because we were going through a long process of finding a good QB it doesn't mean that will happen the next time we search for one. But that we had to go through that list of QBs to find Romo has nothing to do with Romo. The problem is the approach we are taking as a franchise to find a QB. Bill Parcells changed that and found one in Romo in his first try! Romo was the first QB he invested a long period of time into his developement and Romo panned out. BP went away and Romo - without the right coach went braindead.
But because the way you approach to find or develope a QB for your franchise is a problem the way you handle your starting QB should not be mixed into this and be affected by that. That would be a big mistake. You can't make yourself dependent of one player just because the process to find another one is not in place[/QUOTE]
Beast_from_East;2565619 said:
Third, it seems alot of posters think this is Madden or something and they can just erase cap hits. How the hell are we going to release Romo when we gave him a zillion dollars with a huge chunk of that guaranteed??? This is been explained on this board in multiple post but some still for some reason cant understand capomonics. Its pretty simple.....YOU CANT RELEASE PLAYERS LIKE ROMO, TO, FLO, OR ANYBODY ELSE THAT HAS A LARGE CONTRACT WITH GUARANTEED MONEY........CAPONOMICS 101.
This is another point and you are rigth. But that has nothing to do with my argumentation. But again: you can't make yourself dependent on one player. A solution would be to make Romo take a drastical pay cut (say mabe 50-60%) and invest that money in finding another QB (FA or draft). If Romo plays medicore in 2009 and the other QB shows promises then sit Romo in 2010 and give the other QB a chance. Now you are not dependent on one player. You can cut Romo after the 2010 season the cap hit won't be that big anymore.
Remember: always be in charge and not your player!