Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,876
- Reaction score
- 39,421
Of course he doesn’t get any credit for developing Romo. How convenient. LolAmen. Garrett has had 12 years to develop a QB and hasn’t.
Of course he doesn’t get any credit for developing Romo. How convenient. LolAmen. Garrett has had 12 years to develop a QB and hasn’t.
Parcells could develop QB's, Garrett never has and never will.
Of course he doesn’t get any credit for developing Romo. How convenient. Lol
Exactly. Parcells won with Quincy Carter at quarterback for crying out loud! The guy should have a temple erected in his honor.
This staff can't get out of their own way unless "everything's perfect".
Then you can argue and present your stance. I will continue to present mine . ThanksAs long as you sit here and try to let Garrett off the hook while blaming anyone and everyone else?
Yes, I guess we do.
That bull**** isn't and never will fly.
That’s an opinion I don’t agree with.Because he didn't genius!
Then you can argue and present your stance. I will continue to present mine . Thanks
Coach G carries some responsibility but he’s not responsible for lack of talent.
That’s an opinion I don’t agree with with.
And of course now you find a need to personally insult me out of frustration. How predictable sir.
He "had it" as a rookie. But, as I've said 100 times, why do all quarterbacks get worse not better the longer they work with this coaching staff?
How many quarterback names need to be added to the Sucks! list before we realize the coaching is ultimately responsible too?
He started for half a season. Romo heading into 2007 was a very unseasoned starter.I'll let you cut your own throat.
How many years was Romo here before the guy you're trying to say developed him?
How many?
Maybe it's on the highest paid guard and tackle in the NFL that are playing Ole with the DL. My point is that there is blame to spread around...QB....OL....RB....OC....
RGIII had it as a rookie too.
That has no bearing on the coaching staff IMO
He started for half a season. Romo heading into 2007 was a very unseasoned starter.
And Coach G offense also complemented Romo’s ability.
While Peyton brought Romo in it can be argued he was an unfinished talent until Coach G came in. Romo looked much more polished in 2007 than 2006 IMO.
Well, I don't know about that so much. I think it's hard to know because of who the coach is. I mean, I thought Dak was making good throws in the first half, overall (before I decided to play video games). The problem is, as I said on another thread, that our receivers and Zeke look unprepared and couldn't catch a cold. That INT that Gallup dropped was actually a good ball by Dak.
Your not able to have a civilized argument . Your bullying doesn’t intimidate me. And I will continue to present my opinions.He's the head coach, he's responsible for all of it!
But keep embarrassing yourself trying to play the apologist. You and the red-headed moron are probably related.
I can redirect the question however I choose. I have no responbility to adhere to your cross examination.Answer the question.
Cut your own throat.
Manage to look even worse.
Seriously?
The coaching staff "has no bearing" on the performance of their players.
Think of how dumb that sounds.