Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,287
- Reaction score
- 38,874
I'm not justifying that play call , I'm just not blaming the loss on it.There are many ways to score a TD. Why pick one of the lowest percentage plays?
You can try to ignore the clock shouldn't be a factor but that would be silly. Shoot, the coaches were worried about the clock, hence the conservative, ground and pound drive with nothing but quick dump off passes. They wanted to chew up clock.
And right when they had run this drive to perfection, they go full blown moron and call one of the lowest percentage passes you could call that has a high probability of not being complete and giving the Packers a needed free timeout.
It's mind numbing people are justifying that play call, at that point in the game, at that spot on the field, with the circumstances as they were.
The only narrative at play here is people like yourself who just can't criticize Garrett. When a team loses, the blame for a loss can lie with many people. In this case, no one is excusing the defense. They failed. But the offense had a chance to protect the defense and they didn't because the coaches, after running a pretty picture perfect drive, went full blown knucklehead and called a low percentage pass play that actually helped the Packers.
PS - Am I misreading your post above? They only needed a FG to tie and force OT. So they didn't have to score a TD.
It's nickpicking . We scored the potential game winning TD which was the objective and consumed as much time off the clock as we could.