WPBCowboysFan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,265
- Reaction score
- 6,532
Please outline for me the building you see that I do not.
Bro, its a PROCESS.
Remember, Rome wasnt built in 3 1/2 seasons.
Please outline for me the building you see that I do not.
its a PROCESS.
I could be. Going mostly off if personal experience and my recollections if which posters complained the most back then. These things tend to remain fairly constant. With "realists" complaining about everything and homers defending everything.
Wow, isn't that funny, ... what, .. are you like 12?
Let's see, .. posts are into the 40's, .. and it's heading to page3, .. so I'm guessing it's a thread.
Sorry to confuse you. Most people managed to figure it out on their own.
What do you think this implies, or what are you trying to point out with this?
You've said this before and I honestly don't know where you are trying to go with it.
OK, .. so it's the off-season.
Wade Phillips and Jason Garrett are tied at 56 games as the Dallas Cowboys head coach ….
RECORD AS COWBOYS COACH:
Wade Phillips 34-22 Garret 29-27
We are in for a long, bad ride. As if it hasn’t been long enough and bad enough as it is.
Tom Landry started out 13-38-3 in his first 54 games
Tom Landry started out 13-38-3 in his first 54 games
Not going anywhere with it, really. I just think that's what's happening. The posters dissatisfied most with the trends under Wade are largely the group most dissatisfied with Garrett. Their frustration's only gotten greater the last three seasons. And the guys most likely to stick up for Wade and the team are also most likely to stick up for Garrett now.
Im pretty sure Garrett had some say when Wade was the hc, so Wade didnt build it all by himself.
I will be pretty happy when this and "right kinda guy" is out of the fan collective lexicon.
He built the Cowboys from nothing though.
Jason should have done a lot better than he has done. He's just not a very good coach at this point in his career.
The only hope we have for next year is the fact he won't have his hands on the offense much at all.
The less he does the better for the Cowboys.
Yes, he did.
And ? .... so what?
Certainly you know the back story about how he started, ... and that it has no relevance to how Wade and Garrett started.
Yes I know this, and this was the response I expected. And good responses.
Just thought I would throw that out there.
And I agree, Garrett should have done better. But I also take into account of the decimating injuries over the past 2 years. So won't do that comparison.
But stats and such can be used to justify ones opinion how ever they see fit. I am sure there are other comparisons similar that goes either way. Average for 3 or 4 years, then next thing you know, a SB win or at least an appearance.
Wade lost the team, for whatever reasons, but Garrett has not lost this team. This is the year we will see.
Except in Chicago, but they were cold and stuff
Wade lost the team, for whatever reasons, but Garrett has not lost this team. This is the year we will see.
That was just a butt whipping, it happens, not a result of losing the team.
If he lost the team, explain why they had a chance to beat the Eagles in the last game, with a horrible defense, and a back up QB.
They played extremely hard in that game.
Not the measuring stick for our coach that I was hoping for.