So it was a great game yesterday by Garrett?
As I've said in the past, I really am curious as to where the breaking point will be for some of you guys with regards to Garrett. Seems all of last year and now starting this year, it's nothing but excuses and roses for Garrett.
that was a little tongue in check but I see growth you see failure and I am thoroughly through with pointing out what appears as the obvious and others have the opposite view. It's just life like democrats vs republicans. There is no accounting for it.
I wish we could divide the board like the pundits.com have done. I think its a great idea but I think people just want to blow steam.
**** seriously **** and how about we get another real coach, last one we had was Parcells
The one constant has been Garrett. And if he's not building the game plans he's still responsible for them. He's the head coach. If he has an issue with Linehan and how he is using Bryant he can simply walk down to his office and tell him what he wants.
Equally strange is this idea that it's too difficult to move Bryant around. That he has to play outside all the time. Somehow, some way Atlanta moves Jones around. AJ Green plays out of the slot from time to time too.
My complaining about Garrett is offset by your constant excuse making for him.
Has Garrett ever once taken the blame for anything? Has he ever said "I need to do better as a coach" beyond generic statements like "We all need to do our jobs" or something along those lines? I hear a lot of other coaches, every Sunday, putting the onus on themselves after a lackluster performance.
Dak had 45 pass attempts and 26 of those throws were targeted between just two players....Jason Witten and Cole Beasley.
Unfortunately, most of our brainiac fanbase can't make out what was happening in terms of the Giants not wanting to be beaten by the WRs on the outside (Dez and T-Will combined for just 9 total targets) which resulted in Witten and Beasley seeing a ton of clean looks on underneath routes which is what Dak, a rookie QB, chose to attack. Whether folks like it or not, that's exactly what Garrett was talking about "taking what they gave us."
Instead, immediately post-game on the board we get all the usual ignorant posters spouting off about Dez being a bum, stealing money from the Cowboys, not being an elite WR anymore... One of the worst overreactions and mindless blathering I've ever witnessed.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...b-dak-prescott-exemplifies-poise-in-nfl-debut
"Prescott deserves even more credit for his poise because he also didn't have the running game theCowboys were expected to provide. The Giants successfully contained rookie running back Ezekiel Elliott (who gained 51 yards on 20 carries), largely because they had an effective strategy that allowed them to crowd the line of scrimmage and provide deep help to control Bryant. Garrett said New York accomplished this by playing a lot of two-deep coverage and then blitzing safeties to disrupt the run game. It's the kind of tactic teams can use when facing a first-time starter."
Don't tell that to the brainiacs on this board. Dez simply isn't an elite receiver....so they say.
And bryant goes to the pro bowl with romo...You mean like DEFENSES ALWAYS DO AGAINST Dallas... They even do that with Romo...
This thread is silly.
Do people honestly not consider that Garrett was working with a rookie QB in his first game?
They scored 27 points if Beasley and Dez didn't drop touchdowns.
This thread is silly.
Do people honestly not consider that Garrett was working with a rookie QB in his first game?
They scored 27 points if Beasley and Dez didn't drop touchdowns.