I don’t support mediocrity. After a couple decades I’ve learned to accept it. Jerry lowers the bar here not Jason who’s a product of the dysfunction not the cause.Personal insults? How do I know that you’re a red head? lol. It was a joke at the expense of The Carrot.
“And I’m a supporter of Garrett because up until now he’s been the most influential puppet in building a better team and attempting to keep it on tract despite the disturbing distractions and meddling from Jerry that has detoured better coaches here than Garrett.”
So you support him because he’s the best puppet we can have? That’s a terrible excuse for supporting a guy who couldn’t win with multiple versions of this team. There’s literally no point in keeping him. He’s had his chance. 10 years is enough. There needs to be a change at the HC position, for better or worse.
Majority of people, Cowboys fan or not, agree that he should be gone. He honestly should’ve been gone a long time ago. It’s really baffling to me how you can continue to support mediocrity.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results” - Albert Einstein
So does he do nothing on the sidelines...or NOT? If he "just sat there like he always did"....how can you blame him for a loss, and not credit him for a win> I'm sincere...I don;t get your logic. If his MO get's credit for a loss...why wouldn't "like he always did" get credit for a win? If the team can perform despite and in spite of him...why don't they do it all the time?Garrett just sat there on the sideline like he always did
The players played ONE good game....
Garrett is still garbage man
HAY LOOK GUIS!! I MADE ANUDDER STOOPID POST I KANT BAKUP!!
~drool~
Personal insults? How do I know that you’re a red head? lol. It was a joke at the expense of The Carrot.
`Snipped for space and clarity~n
If you want to measure/judge a HC, then many factors have to be considered,So, our only means to measure coaching is how far their roster takes them?
I think I could . I don’t think we’ve had a SB caliber team. And whether we had Jerry or not with the rosters we’ve fielded certainly hasn’t looked a SB champion if we’re using most of the teams that have won championships as measurable.
That doesn’t mean Jerry hasn’t been the culprit on not building a better team but these eyes haven’t felt any Titles have been left on the field like in 1994 or 1980, 1979, 1975, 1970, 1966 and 1967.
Yes, we dominated the Colts. Turnovers cost us. This was the one SB loss we definitely should have had.did you really expect us to beat the Colts in 1970 with Calvin Hill not on the field?
I would add the 1978, 1981, 1983, 2007, and 2014 squads to the list.
1994 and 2014 really sucked - we were purposely ripped off by refs
the Boys have left a lot of meat on the bone in every decade since founded
sometimes it's tough being a Cowboy fan
This is painfully false. The talent wins in spite of the coaching, it loses because of it. The flip side is true for teams with good coaching but poor talent.I’m just saying if you’re going to blame him for all of the losses then he must receive credit for the wins.
That’s the most ridiculous comment I’ve seen. If the talent wins despite the coaching then it loses in the same fashion.This is painfully false. The talent wins in spite of the coaching, it loses because of it. The flip side is true for teams with good coaching but poor talent.
You can't do that every week. If your coaching is putting the talent into disadvantageous situations, the talent never has a chance.If the talent wins despite the coaching then it loses in the same fashion.
The Cowboys have been a talent dependent franchise this era . If our talent isn’t enough to overcome we lose .
I didn't see that at all. Offensively, that looked like Kellen Moore because running the ball is very un-Garrett like. and don't get all excited about our defense. They only had to worry about the short side of the field because Goff couldn't throw long or with accuracy. Wade may have been outcoached due to seeing a different look but it is hard to stop a running game where the line is above average and those two backs are hungry. I doubt Garrett had much to do with this at all.Funny how the tables turned with Jason basically knocking the Rams out of the playoffs a week after the Rams looked they were back with an impressive win against Seattle.
The boy genius everyone was heralding last year as the new model for coaching in the NFL as he took it to Garrett in the playoffs going to Super Bowl has suddenly turned sour.
How could a spiraling down HC like Garrett blow out a genius in almost every facet of the game but the coin flip?
YepYou can't do that every week. If your coaching is putting the talent into disadvantageous situations, the talent never has a chance.
This is a huge indictment of the coaching staff lol.
Which supports my theory that our coaching isn’t effecting wins or losses. It’s mostly on the talent either way.I didn't see that at all. Offensively, that looked like Kellen Moore because running the ball is very un-Garrett like. and don't get all excited about our defense. They only had to worry about the short side of the field because Goff couldn't throw long or with accuracy. Wade may have been outcoached due to seeing a different look but it is hard to stop a running game where the line is above average and those two backs are hungry. I doubt Garrett had much to do with this at all.
Then what's the premise of your title?Which supports my theory that our coaching isn’t effecting wins or losses. It’s mostly on the talent either way.