Kilyin said:I was just pointing out that Manning has done okay for a second year QB by putting up similar numbers to a 13 year Vet - with less turnovers. If he tanks next year, then I may start criticizing him.
As for your assertion that Manning wouldn't have done better than Bledsoe, that's pure speculation. I won't argue either way on that because it's pointless and can't be proven either way.
Bledsoe is one of the most turnover prone QBs in the league because of his abnormal amount of fumbles. Always has been. Manning seems to be taking better care of the ball already (0 lost fumbles), which gives him a distinct advantage over Bledsoe in my book.
Kilyin said:I was just pointing out that Manning has done okay for a second year QB by putting up similar numbers to a 13 year Vet - with less turnovers. If he tanks next year, then I may start criticizing him.
As for your assertion that Manning wouldn't have done better than Bledsoe, that's pure speculation. I won't argue either way on that because it's pointless and can't be proven either way.
Bledsoe is one of the most turnover prone QBs in the league because of his abnormal amount of fumbles. Always has been. Manning seems to be taking better care of the ball already (0 lost fumbles), which gives him a distinct advantage over Bledsoe in my book.
Kilyin said:I used nfl.com, which says otherwise. Either way, 0 or 2 is better than 8.
http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/493004
BigDFan5 said:Well I will stick with their official site
Yes its better than 8 but we had the equivalent of road cones playing tackle
superpunk said:I have had my *** kicked by road cones on numerous occasions. Don't sell them short.
BigDFan5 said:You shouldn;t drink so much