manster4ever
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,021
- Reaction score
- 3,378
I hate to say it, but yeah, I think they kinda are.
Their "runnings backs" are a converted wide receiver and a big, slow fullback. They're missing Lacy. He averaged 6 yards per carry in last season's playoffs.
Just another reason to want them next week.
Romo isn't eating anyone alive.Romo would eat the Giants alive. Just saying.
How was that not spearing the receiver with the helmet on Nelson?
I would have tried someone off the street out at RB before relying on a WR, but that's just me. Refusing to run the ball, as I you're down by 20, is what's going to do in the Packers.
The difference in those guys, however, is that Romo would try to complete a pass...good or bad. Rodgers holding onto the ball a lot but not turning it over.Not today he wouldn't. Romo is not better than Rodgers and Rodgers can't complete passes because the coverage is THAT good.
DCR, Collins, Hall, Jenkins.
Then they got some quality young players - Apple, Wade, Adams.
That's the best secondary in the NFC.
Romo with Zeke, and that O-Line. I disagree with you, he has a better team around than Rodgers does and he could be up 13-6 right now.Not today he wouldn't. Romo is not better than Rodgers and Rodgers can't complete passes because the coverage is THAT good.
Cold weather games suck ***.
Romo would eat the Giants alive. Just saying.
Romo isn't eating at all.Romo isn't eating anyone alive.