Give Wade a chance for pete's sake.

mschmidt64;1367677 said:
Because I don't think who is relevant to my argument.

We all agree good exists.

I just don't agree that Phillips is good. That should be the concentration of the debate.

I think you just have some kind of fat person bias...and I really don't like that one bit.
 
smarta5150;1367328 said:
Thats it... why did you bring up AC/DC and whoever else over this. Talk about getting side tracked.
Because Parcells, much like Australia's finest, at least has success on his resume as a head coach. Phillips has mediocrity, which isn't good enough for the Cowboys. But hey, if it means we get to keep running the 3-4....
 
BrAinPaiNt;1367696 said:
I think you just have some kind of fat person bias...and I really don't like that one bit.

Yeah, but I loved Parcells.
 
mschmidt64;1367677 said:
Because I don't think who is relevant to my argument.

We all agree good exists.

I just don't agree that Phillips is good. That should be the concentration of the debate.

this isnt exactly platonic virtue here. you said there was someone better out there and you couldnt name it. its weak and youd get much more respect if you would just own up to it.

i mean if you really want to go reductionist you could always say that there is someone better out there. the universe is infinite and as such there is no such thing as greatest blah blah blah.

and its impossible to have a debate when you are dealing with someone who refuses to address the actual points. talking to you is like talking to a kid with adhd.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,307
Messages
13,864,812
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top