mschmidt64;1367677 said:
Because I don't think who is relevant to my argument.
We all agree good exists.
I just don't agree that Phillips is good. That should be the concentration of the debate.
this isnt exactly platonic virtue here. you said there was someone better out there and you couldnt name it. its weak and youd get much more respect if you would just own up to it.
i mean if you really want to go reductionist you could always say that there is someone better out there. the universe is infinite and as such there is no such thing as greatest blah blah blah.
and its impossible to have a debate when you are dealing with someone who refuses to address the actual points. talking to you is like talking to a kid with adhd.