Goff vs Prescott

[CalPolyTechnique]

Facts dont work with him for some reason

Math doesn’t work for you.

I didn’t know we had “alternative facts” for math?

Now go ignore this like you did the Goff data and claim victory.

 

[Melonfeud]

Absolutely stupid thread. Young QB and coach went up against the GOAT QB and coach. Phillips was the only vet with the Rams and it showed.

Goff got to the Super Bowl - Dak is slipping his tongue down a strippers throat right now and wondering what that itch is downstairs.

#4 had probably picked up a body louse (crab),,, concerning that 'itch' when he'd utilized the gentleman's Club washroom facilities,,,where yer' nightly Manning that other side of the hole in the stalls wall of crapper#3,,,

 

[xwalker]

55 is 148.65 percent of 37.

The Cowboys rushing TDs were 148.65 percent of the Eagles rushing TDs which as I said is more.

 

[LatinMind]

Got to agree you come to what is supposed to be a Cowboys forum where Cowboy fans talk football and you have a handful of trolls that do nothing but bash our QB like he threw a bunch of game ending INTs and led us to a 4-12 season while costing us 1st rd draft picks and 28 million .

We made some good progress this year our young QB all but ran the table in the 2nd half of the season to get us to the playoffs and won a game . We have something to build on and reason to be hopeful . Mods get rid of these trolls that do nothing positive on this forum and insult our QB

For me its not even about the Dak bashing, its just in general. We have a stickied post reguarding the rules about this type of posting and still these posters dont seem to care. Theyre here for one thing and thats it. But nothing is being done about it and theyre ruining a great thing the owner has created here. Its robbed this place of very good views on the team outside the norm of the national media spotlight. I just hope these moderators can do something about it because ive seen warning stickied post after warning stickied post and it just doesnt seem to do anything to change the way these certain posters are hijacking every thread.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

55 is 148.65 percent of 37.

The Cowboys rushing TDs were 148.65 percent of the Eagles rushing TDs which as I said is more.

Stop....please stop, lulz.

Let me help you since your side obviously needs it.

What’s 100% increase of 1?

Hint [it’s 2]

What’s 100% of 37?

Answer: 74

You don’t just multiply 150% and 37. You add the resulting figure (55) to the original figure (37) to get 92. As if the Cowboys scored 92 TDs it would be a 150% more from what the Rams ran for (ie. 37).

Seriously, I need to start getting paid for this stuff....every day on board it’s become a tutoring session.

 

[xwalker]

Stop....please stop, lulz.

Let me help you since your side obviously needs it.

What’s 100% of 1?

Hint [its 2]

What’s 100% of 37?

Answer: 74

Seriously, I need to start getting paid for this stuff....every day on board it’s become a tutoring session.

That is moronic.

100% of 1 is 1.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Math doesn’t work for you.

I didn’t know we had “alternative facts” for math?

Now go ignore this like you did the Goff data and claim victory.

Originally you said they had similar production despite less games played, Goff doesnt have similar production lmao, so there really wasn't a need to discuss him.

You dont want to lose again my dude this is why I said you and Blu are funny, because we laugh at the stuff yall say. And you think you're actually out ahead somehow?

Do you understand the 6 pass attempt per game difference math yet, or are you still slow?

 

[LatinMind]

Stop....please stop, lulz.

Let me help you since your side obviously needs it.

What’s 100% of 1?

Hint [its 2]

What’s 100% of 37?

Answer: 74

Seriously, I need to start getting paid for this stuff....every day on board it’s become a tutoring session.

100% of 1 is 1
200% of 1 is 2

the same goes for 37

200% is 74

 

[Kaiser]

That is moronic.

100% of 1 is 1.

Say it with me......

THE FINEST EDUCATION CENTRAL CALIFORNIA HAS TO OFFER

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

That is moronic.

100% of 1 is 1.

 

[LatinMind]

Say it with me......

THE FINEST EDUCATION CENTRAL CALIFORNIA HAS TO OFFER

xwalker is from central cali?

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

Say it with me......

THE FINEST EDUCATION CENTRAL CALIFORNIA HAS TO OFFER

Kaiser: “Hey guys! I got a 100% increase from my $12/hour job!”

[So what are you making now?]

Kaiser: “$12 an hour!!!!”

 

[Kaiser]

xwalker is from central cali?

No, Cal Poly is.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

100% of 1 is 1
200% of 1 is 2

the same goes for 37

200% is 74

Looool, my gosh!

This is astounding...

If you had $37 and I gave you more cash that resulted in you having $74, what is the percentage increase?

A 100% increase from 37 is 74; a 150% from 37 is 92.5 to be exact.

A 100% increase from 1 is 2.

The original claim by xwalker is that the Cowboys rushing TD total of 55 (2016-2018) is “150% more” than the Eagles 37 TDs.

 

[zerofill]

Was only his 3rd year... remember, that is the excuse being used a lot for Dak... so I guess it goes both ways.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Kaiser: “Hey guys! I got a 100% increase from my $12/hour job!”

[So what are you making now?]

Kaiser: “$12 an hour!!!!”

Remember when you understand that %'s take into sample size when it came to Cooper's drop compared to the rest ofthe raiders? You thought Cooper sucked.

The trend continues on you flat out not knowing how %'s work lmao

 

[Kaiser]

Kaiser: “Hey guys! I got a 100% increase from my $12/hour job!”

[So what are you making now?]

Kaiser: “$12 an hour!!!!”

Its hilarious that cubicle engineer Cal Poly, whose entire identity is his college degree, had to go back and edit that entire post for it to make sense.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

Its hilarious that cubicle engineer Cal Poly, whose entire identity is his college degree, had to go back and edit that entire post for it to make sense.

It’s amazing that you can’t figure out simple percentage increase.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Its hilarious that cubicle engineer Cal Poly, whose entire identity is his college degree, had to go back and edit that entire post for it to make sense.

There's no way in hell he's an engineer. I'm sorry that's just a flat out lie.
Numbers are essential to the engineering field and those escape him.

Not understanding that 100% 1 is 1 is about as basic as it gets. Maybe he works AT an engineering firm? Like a clerk or something?

It would make sense because he doesnt understand the difference between 100% OF something and a 100% INCREASE of something which is kinda similar to him being AT an engineering firm not an actual engineer.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

There's no way in hell he's an engineer. I'm sorry that's just a flat out lie.
Numbers are essential to the engineering field and those escape him.

Not understanding that 100% 1 is 1 is about as basic as it gets. Maybe he works AT an engineering firm? Like a clerk or something?

It would make sense because he doesnt understand the difference between 100% OF something and a 100% INCREASE of something which is kinda similar to him being AT an engineering firm not an actual engineer.

Loool, what’s 100% increase of 2?

C’mon.

Don’t run.