270 yards rushing against us got him to the Superbowl as well. I have repeated this over and over again. But, emphasis this point, because Dak having Zeke, is what constantly is used to discredit him. Yet, when it comes to QBs that fans favor, they either ignore the Running game contributing to team''s playoff run, in order to give credit to the QB that they like. Or they just use the solid running game and strong supporting cast, if favor of the QB that they support.
"He's a elite QB, he just needs a solid running game to reach his full potential or he couldn't accomplish certain goals, because he didn't have a solid running game/supporting cast. But, I still believe he can be elite and great with a better team."
And if some support QBs like Goff, then they will use a solid running game to enhance the debate in favor of Goff or they still give Goff most of the credit for making it to the Superbowl, despite a huge rushing game being more of a reason why the Rams beat us.
Yet, with Dak it's. "He's not a great QB and will never be a great QB, because he has to have Zeke playing well to win/be productive."
Let's night, Gurley was limited and Belechick wouldn't allow the Rams running game to take off and that put most of the pressure on Dak and the Rams had one of the poorest offensive performances of the Superbowl. That happens with Dak and people are saying how Dak can't win without Zeke.