He had Elliott's help in doing that.
Once this went public and the investigation launched, what would you have advised Elliott to do? The media had this story by the tail and his background about his father moving to Columbus and his rep as a party boy became national news because this is the Cowboys.
Back to my question. Would you have advised him to go to that parade and get himself videoed disrespecting a woman in public? That happens without the investigation going on, that's page 6 stuff but that wasn't the case and it was page 1. Now this had moved into the most precarious court for the NFL, the one of public opinion.
So, Elliott pulling that dumb stunt, does that make people less or more likely to think he could have committed DV? He's not even taking the investigation seriously and this is the guy that announced he was going pro after losing to MI and he was pissed because he wasn't featured more. He's privileged in their minds.
And then there's that panel with their unanimous recommendation, is Goodell just to sweep that aside and suffer the wrath of the movement he just got a little taste of with Rice? He let's Elliott skate and it's open season on him and the NFL.
Goodell helped put himself in that situation with the handling of the Rice incident but Elliott did his part to help force Goodell into that decision because I said it at the time, that parade incident removed the benefit of the doubt with a lot of the public but completely with women. It was exactly the type thing I would expect from a guy that had to have his father move to his college town to get him under some control.