I absolutely hate what I saw on Sunday from this against the Rams. We really got pushed around, right up the middle against the Rams. I hate this 42 look we are running.
Totally agree. What i hated the most is taking two former pro bowl DEs - Tank and Griffen - and seeing them line up in two point stance. It may be too early to judge, but they looked terribly awkward. Here are my wishful thoughts for the D to be more multiple, and put the players in the best possible position to exceed:
The defense cannot play on its heels and need to place the talents of A. Smith, Lawrence, and Griffen in their best possible position to exceed. That being said, it appears that only A. Smith truly is comfortable at the moment playing a hybrid OLB/DE role while rushing from a two point stand.
I get this is a move away from Marinelli’s basic 4-3 defense and embrace the philosophy of becoming more multiple, but after only one week, I am deeply concerned that this defense will not suit the talents of both Lawrence and Griffen. They looked ultra-tentative and misplaced when trying to rush from a two point stand.
An equal concern is seeing J. Smith line up off the line of scrimmage being asked to shed blocks, take on RBs head-on. We need to protect J. Smith by having him attack the line of scrimmage and limit an offenses opportunities of running right at him.
Without further ado, I present the different alignments we need to go with:
1. Base 4-2-5
In this alignment, we show a traditional 4 DL front:
LE – Lawrence
NT- Woods
UT – Hill/Gallimore/Crawford
RE – Griffen
LB – Gifford
LB – Bernard
In this alignment, I prefer Woods over Poe in order to get up the field more. It places Lawrence / Griffen in traditional DE spots with three-point stance, and let’s go with Gifford/Bernard (until Lee and Vander Esch are healthy) to take on blocks and RBs. The DL play one-gap and get up the field which truly suits the down linemen’s strengths.
2. 3-4 Look
In this alignment, we show a 3-4 look, but it’s really a design to have a 5 man rush:
DE/T – Crawford
NT – Poe
DE/T - Hill/Gallimore
OLB/E – A. Smith
ILB – Gifford
ILB – Bernard
OLB/E – J. Smith
In this alignment, we get a 5 man rush with the Smith’s as bookend “stand-up pass rushers”. The down lineman play a two gap technique. I can see offenses looking to attack J. Smith by running right at him, but I think the combination of Crawford/Poe can tie up at least three blockers to help get LB’s Gifford or Bernard flowing to help J. Smith hold up versus the run.
And if running at A. Smith we get to see J. Smith run and chase from behind, while also attacking the QB.
3. 4-2-5 (Nickel)
This is our 2nd and long / 3rd and long passing down alignment. This alignment will feature our best pass rushers.
LE – Lawrence
LT – Crawford
RT – Griffen
RE – A. Smith
ILB – Thomas
ILB – J. Smith
In this alignment, we truly have the makings of playing to the front four’s strengths, with combinations of stunts and pass rush from our four best pass rushers. Most times, J. Smith will attack the line of scrimmage as a fifth pass rusher, coming on stunts up the middle or off the edge. We also have an ability of playing Griffen at RE, and have A. Smith stand up and rush from the inside along with J. Smith. Thomas will be the one coverage LB dropping into the middle zone with at times some blitzing.
Conclusion: we play to our players’ strengths:
J. Smith / A. Smith as bookend stand up pass rushers and rushing from various spots.
Lawrence / Griffen as bookend DEs playing with one hand in the turf.
Poe as a traditional NT
It’s a pressure defense which should get the players playing less on their heels and attacking more.