You arent trading a 4th for your QB of rhe future.Of course it’s why they traded for him.
Anyone can dream that he would’ve lit the league on fire and become a great starter, but that chance was always microscopic
I don’t think he watched the game-He had multiple throws to the middle of the field . He was very careful in the red zone though-too careful to not throw picks. I am not saying he is the answer but he would have been a better decision than paying Dak 250 millionLOL, WHOA!!!
Tell us how you really feel!
AC, literally only one person mentioned Dak.Right on cue...
The Dak haters' excuse-ridden responses...
AC, literally only one person mentioned Dak.
Rush and/or Trance will sign for the minimum allowed if they sign anywhere at all.You arent trading a 4th for your QB of rhe future.
They were looking to make Rush expendable. They might be able to keep Lance on a very cheap deal.
All our QB's are NO BUENO.c minus
same as dak
i agree 100%All our QB's are NO BUENO.
Rush is the only one that actually played better than his salary/position drafted and he is far from being good enough. We need 3 new QB's.
So if a QB goes 20/25 350 yards 4 TDs 0 ints but lose in a shootout they get an F? There is no team aspect to winning and losing?F= Fail. How do you give a grade better when you lost the game? Underthrows a TD.