Verdict;1180939 said:
That is mostly true; however, the Pats have also kept the players they deem are irreplaceable, like Brady. We seem to have gotten good value in the recent extensions we gave out. The advantage to resigning your own guys is that your "miss" rate should theoretically be greatly reduced since you should "know" what you have already. It is more of a gamble signing a free agent off the street.
The most interesting extension we gave this year in my mind is Brady James. The staff must really think he is just coming into his own, because he seems like a player that could have been replaced more easily than the rest at a lower cost. Then again, I have been wrong before.
The Pats system has little to do with replacing a player and more to do with paying them what they think they are worth. Seymour is a top notch defensive player. Brady is a top notch QB. They wanted top notch money and they got it because they were worth it.
David Givens wanted and got #1 WR money. He's not a #1 WR. The same could be said for Deion Branch, who has yet to really prove to me he's worth that much.
McGinest wanted good money and a contract extension. But at his age he simply wasn't worth the risk. The same could be said for Vinatieri to a degree. Pro Football Prospectus showed a great stat of his game winning kicks and they were far, far shorter kicks than most game winning field goals that other NFL kickers have to make. Ty Law was on the wrong side of 30, coming off a broken foot and wanted to be like a top 3 CB.
So for the Pats, the number one priority is getting their money's worth. If a player is truly great and doesn't have any significant risk factors (i.e. never fully proving himself, injuries, age, etc) they'll pay him good money. But if they are asking for more than they are worth or it's too risky, they'll just re-build through the draft at that spot.
The Eagles seem to have more of a budgetary process based on position. They don't like to pay WR's or LB's very much, but will shell out $$$ for DE's, CB's, and O-Linemen. They look at the same risk factors like the Pats do, but are much more stringent. Not only was Owens a good example of their budgetary process, but Jeremiah Trotter was as well. The Eagles could've matched the Skins offer back when he signed with Washington, but the Eagles lowballed him because they just don't value LB's all that much. The Trotter case worked out for them, but the Owens case showed the dangers of their budgetary rules.
The Steelers seem to stray away from signing big name FA's at all costs. I don't think they are too nutty about paying a player big $$$, but they will do it. Fortunately for them they are so strong at building through the draft that everything works out great for them.
YAKUZA