For the record, I don't disagree with the overall premise of QBs needing pieces around them to win, but...
- What has Russell done without a Great RB and Great Defense?
- Even then, when the ball was put in his hands, he throws a sure fire victory away to the Patriots.
- What has Luck done, period?
- The guy puts up stats and can get into the playoffs, but the guy lead an offense to just 7 points when the D gave up 42 in his ONLY AFC Championship appearance
- What has Wentz done without a great team around him?
- You know, the one that is able to win the SB WITHOUT him?
- Hell, does Peyton Manning have any SB wins without his defenses stepping up in those playoffs?
- The Denver D was great all year, but that Colts D kept 3 of the 4 opponents under 17 points or less for his Colts ring.
- What do we think of Brees if he never teams up with Sean Payton?
- And even then, they have just TWO NFC Championship appearances in 13 years, going 1-1 in those games.
- Aaron Rogers is one of the greatest QBs of this generation
- Yet he is just 1-3 in NFC Championship games and just got another coach fired.
There is ONLY ONE outlier in the post-salary cap era for a QB to have continual success. ONLY one. And that QB is well underpaid so he can continue to have a team built around him.
And even then, he is a part of some of the biggest choke jobs in Super Bowl history in both Giants losses and then losing to the Eagles BACKUP QB.
I don't care who the QB is, there has NEVER been a QB that has done it all by himself, but let's keep pretending that Dallas is the ONLY franchise in history that has a QB that needs people around them to win.