sandbridge77
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 582
- Reaction score
- 682
Lol Cowboy Roy was moving on 5 pages ago, can’t help himself
This is silly. We won 12 games with Dak so no we wouldn’t win 12 with Jones. And Jones isn’t on a rookie contract, he’s also being paid 40M. So tell me would you rather have jones at 40M or Dak at 40M?I think Dak is better than Jones too, I just don't think the gap is that wide. How many less wins do we have if Jones was our QB last year? I think we're still around 11-12 wins.
I'd take Jones on a rookie contract over Dak at 40-50 million a year.
Actually no, we won 8 games with Dak.This is silly. We won 12 games with Dak so no we wouldn’t win 12 with Jones. And Jones isn’t on a rookie contract, he’s also being paid 40M. So tell me would you rather have jones at 40M or Dak at 40M?
Wow so Dak won virtually as many games as Jones while missing 6 games? Damn jones sucks worse than I thoughtActually no, we won 8 games with Dak.
I doubt jones has any more success in the Dallas circus than Dak didJones went to a horrible team, with inconsistent and questionable coaching for much of his career.
Imagine if Dak had gone to NY, and Jones had come here. A tremendous amount of the success or failure of a QB depends on their coaching and teammates.
Many promising young QB's have their careers ruined by being drafted by a horrible team, and expected to be an immediate savior.
The desperation of Dak haters who now are pimping Daniel Jones and licking his crutch in desperate attempts to knock Dak.
Sad. Very Sad.
Let's just say neither is Elite. Does it really matter what some sports talk head says about their rankings!!??
This is the 18363 Dak threads and total of 837362 pages and 3827291827 comments.Why does it matter what the forum is expressing?
!!??...Dak haters?
This is probably correct.I doubt jones has any more success in the Dallas circus than Dak did
This is silly. We won 12 games with Dak so no we wouldn’t win 12 with Jones. And Jones isn’t on a rookie contract, he’s also being paid 40M. So tell me would you rather have jones at 40M or Dak at 40M?
The bigger question is would Dallas even get to the SF game with Jones at the helm....doubtfulThis is probably correct.
One can speculate as to how Dallas would have fared against San Francisco with Jones at the helm. Dak's performance is not up for debate.
Only a melvin would say a bad QB contract is no excuse for failing. Not only do you have a not good enough player on the field at the most important position but you've devoted about a quarter of your cap space to him.Coming from you? I believe you truly think that.
Cool bruh , I have somewhat of the same we shall see stance. But make no mistake about it, I'm rooting for improvement ove last year !Oh, i don't really care, and I didn't list my actual opinion. I was only posting here against people who were claiming that jennings said anything anti dak or that this was being used for ratings. I think he gave a valid opinion of what could happen this year. We will see.
So dak leading a top 10 offense is as effective as Rush leading the 22nd ranked offense.We won 9 games with Dak. Cooper Rush won 3 of 4 proving that Dak isn’t that much of a difference maker even though he is a better player than Rush.
Who would you be able to replace him with? Give us your realistic alternative and tell is why it makes us better?Only a melvin would say a bad QB contract is no excuse for failing. Not only do you have a not good enough player on the field at the most important position but you've devoted about a quarter of your cap space to him.
So in other words you said...."A bad QB and less money to spend is no excuse for not contending."
We are dumber for having read it.
Other than that you make a good point.
pause the threadOnly a melvin would say a bad QB contract is no excuse for failing. Not only do you have a not good enough player on the field at the most important position but you've devoted about a quarter of your cap space to him.
So in other words you said...."A bad QB and less money to spend is no excuse for not contending."
We are dumber for having read it.
Other than that you make a good point.
Wins and losses Rush can get us to about the same spot Dak can.So dak leading a top 10 offense is as effective as Rush leading the 22nd ranked offense.
I bet you miss the forest because of the trees