Greg Jennings took one too many hits to the head
The transcript (Greg Jennings comments in
bold)
Yes. And I'm going to say something that I have said.
Yes.
And I don't want to hear anything until the end of this. Daniel Jones is a top ten quarterback.
What?
Daniel Jones is a top ten quarterback.
Wow!
I said it.
In what league?
And I say it with my chest. Like John. What you just heard from John Mara. He obviously knows he sees, what he sees, but the progression is there. When we see guys progressing, we automatically want them to do it the way that Joe Burrow has done it. The way that Justin Herbert has done it. That wasn't Daniel Jones. And that's okay because he's gotten paid. He's going to keep his head down. He's going to continue to work. You bring in a guy like Darren Waller. Obviously you're going to improve. If he can stay healthy, he's a great asset to that offense. Daniel Jones production will continue to improve. He will be one of the better quarter...
You know you just said top 10
Hold hold. Let me. Let me.
Let's say one of the better.
Let me finish please. He will be the second best quarterback in his division.
Behind Jalen Hurts?
Behind Jalen Hurts.
So he's better than Dak Prescott?
He's better than Dak Prescott.
__________________________
To summarize, Jennings' opinion is:
- Daniel Jones is a top ten quarterback
- whose progression he does not define specifically
- reading between his lines, Darren Waller 'will help' Jones' progression
- Jones' contract 'supports' his viewpoint
The bulk is the usual, entirely sports talking head fluff leading to Jennings' prediction that Jones will eventually become the NFC East
second best quarterback. He explains no applicable metric for this prediction. Without details, I assume it is based upon recent
team seasonal advancement such as Philadelphia, led by Hurts, reaching the Super Bowl and Dallas, headed by Prescott, getting to the NFC Divisional round--which, coincidentally, the same round New York and Jones bowed out also.
If true, that undefined metric is team based, not individually based. Taking what seems to be his assumption a step further hypothetically. Let's say New York has a better season than both Philadelphia and Dallas in 2023. Perhaps not reach or win the Super Bowl but New York advancing further in the playoffs than those two rivals. Does the Giants' postseason finish ahead of the Eagles and Cowboys automatically make him the number one quarterback in the division, regardless of his actual productivity and performance?
Jennings could have made a more definitive argument. In the end, it is a minute of the customary gobbledy-gook audiences expect to get. And generate more than a page of conversation on a discussion board, lol.