I think the article said he might not fight if it was reduced by 2-4 games, meaning 6-8 total.
If the league offered him a deal on the condition that he doesn't sue, and for whatever reason he wanted to accept that deal, I don't think the NFLPA has the authority to overrule him, nor would they have the standing to take this case to federal court without his consent and approval.He doesnt need to have the will to fight. NFLPA will fight for him. Stupid article.
If the league offered him a deal on the condition that he doesn't sue, and for whatever reason he wanted to accept that deal, I don't think the NFLPA has the authority to overrule him, nor would they have the standing to take this case to federal court without his consent and approval.
Without looking into it I couldn't be certain, but the NFLPA may well have standing regardless of what Hardy wants.If the league offered him a deal on the condition that he doesn't sue, and for whatever reason he wanted to accept that deal, I don't think the NFLPA has the authority to overrule him, nor would they have the standing to take this case to federal court without his consent and approval.
Cave in to what? He's a client. He doesn't have to do anything that would cause him to be "worn down"
So we are all speculating on if Hardy has the will to continue the fight against the NFL based on some writer's opinion which was based who knows what. I haven't heard Hardy's camp make any statements on this issue.
So this reporter writes a report about what he thinks might happen based on what again?
If, and this is a huge IF, the NFL actually reduces the suspension to 6 games, Hardy, the NFL and the NFLPA know its likely to get reduced to 2 games or possibly 0 games in court.
That would essentially be giving up at minimum $2,312,500 and up to as much as $3,468,750 in per game bonuses. That would also most likely prevent him from reaching his sack incentives which total another possible $1.8 million. Although he would need 14 sacks in 14 games after his post court ruling suspension to get the full incentive, which is unlikely, he could easily reach the $1 million bonus of 10 sacks in a 14 game season. Basically him "giving up the fight" could easily cost him $4.5 million, maybe more. This also doesn't take into account what he would be able to prove on the field which could diminish his next contract. This is a stupid, stupid article and I seriously doubt it has any legitimacy whatsoever.
I trust absolutely nothing from bleacher report.
A tip from the Valley Ranch janitor.