Has the league admitted screwing up by not reviewing Dak's TD?

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,593
Reaction score
36,739
I already explained that. They saw the replays that were shown on TV and none of them showed the football. You couldn’t see the ball in any of them. If you can’t see the ball there’s no way to dispute the no call and call it a TD. They don’t care where the body is they have to see the ball. If some of you want to spend 15+ pages arguing this have fun! Lol
The mistake is the referee made probably the wrong call. Unfortunately there wasn’t enough visual evidence of the ball , which is usually the determining factor , to overturn the questionable call on a TD. And why so much importance is always placed on the call.

The Cowboys had an opportunity to rectify the call on 4th down and failed. And the lessen might be here not to have a QB sneak under the pile.

In the old days officials might wait to make the call after the pile is disbursed which would have been the appropriate decision here . There wouldn’t have been enough visual evidence to overturn a TD call there.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
The ball could've gotten dislodged yet he had possession when they pulled the bodies off? Cmon man, yall are reaching to justify bs.

Of course he had possession of the ball when they pulled the bodies off the pile, the problem was the ball wasn’t over the goal line or they would have signaled touchdown. We see it all the time where they pull bodies off a pile then signal touchdown if the ball has crossed the plane of the goal line. Not even Cowboys players were signaling touchdown after they pulled the bodies off the pile.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
The mistake is the referee made probably the wrong call. Unfortunately there wasn’t enough visual evidence of the ball , which is usually the determining factor , to overturn the questionable call on a TD. And why so much importance is always placed on the call..

They never overturned the call on the field. They never called it a TD. You’re thinking of the other play on the goal line where Dak jumped over the top and fumbled. They initially called that a TD and overturned it.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,753
Reaction score
34,552
Of course he had possession of the ball when they pulled the bodies off the pile, the problem was the ball wasn’t over the goal line or they would have signaled touchdown. We see it all the time where they pull bodies off a pile then signal touchdown if the ball has crossed the plane of the goal line. Not even Cowboys players were signaling touchdown after they pulled the bodies off the pile.

Again, you see his entire body go into the endzone BEFORE his knees come anywhere near the ground. Then (in the endzone) they pull off the bodies and it's clear he maintained possession. It is physically impossible for the ball not to have traveled with him, yet he retained possession.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
Again, you see his entire body go into the endzone BEFORE his knees come anywhere near the ground. Then (in the endzone) they pull off the bodies and it's clear he maintained possession. It is physically impossible for the ball not to have traveled with him, yet he retained possession.

Again, you can’t see the ball and if the ball was in the endzone when they unpiled the bodies they would have signaled touchdown. Cowboys players would have also signaled touchdown. Why can’t you get that? They never signal a touchdown unless they see the ball break the plane or is in the endzone when they unpile bodies. They don’t assume the ball went in the endzone, they have to actually see the ball break the plane of the goal line or is in the end zone. Can’t make it any more clear than that. Not going to debate it any further.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
55,593
Reaction score
36,739
They never overturned the call on the field. They never called it a TD. You’re thinking of the other play on the goal line where Dak jumped over the top and fumbled. They initially called that a TD and overturned it.
I’m saying if they had called it a TD.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,538
Reaction score
94,639
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Again, you can’t see the ball and if the ball was in the endzone when they unpiled the bodies they would have signaled touchdown. Cowboys players would have also signaled touchdown. Why can’t you get that? They never signal a touchdown unless they see the ball break the plane or is in the endzone when they unpile bodies. They don’t assume the ball went in the endzone, they have to actually see the ball break the plane of the goal line or is in the end zone. Can’t make it any more clear than that. Not going to debate it any further.
Are you seriously saying they couldn't see the ball once everyone was out of the way? I don't have access to the tape, but I'm pretty sure I remember seeing the ball well over the line when they pulled the pile apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,050
Reaction score
29,909
It should have been called a TD. I thought a ref called it. If they did then they would not have evidence to over turn it. But if they not call it then they would not have the evidence to change it. Perfect screw job by not calling it,
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,472
Reaction score
26,213
Good God, he was across the line by a large margin. They screwed it up.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,753
Reaction score
34,552
Again, you can’t see the ball and if the ball was in the endzone when they unpiled the bodies they would have signaled touchdown. Cowboys players would have also signaled touchdown. Why can’t you get that? They never signal a touchdown unless they see the ball break the plane or is in the endzone when they unpile bodies. They don’t assume the ball went in the endzone, they have to actually see the ball break the plane of the goal line or is in the end zone. Can’t make it any more clear than that. Not going to debate it any further.

Don't debate then. The qb went into the endzone before going down and maintained possession of the ball after cleaning up the pile.

Because they couldn't see the ball initially is a ridiculous argument. He didn't magically break the laws of physics and somehow leave the ball behind, and then teleport it to his possession after going down. You're argument is ridiculous.
 

DogFace

Carharris2
Messages
13,155
Reaction score
15,624
Again, you can’t see the ball and if the ball was in the endzone when they unpiled the bodies they would have signaled touchdown. Cowboys players would have also signaled touchdown. Why can’t you get that? They never signal a touchdown unless they see the ball break the plane or is in the endzone when they unpile bodies. They don’t assume the ball went in the endzone, they have to actually see the ball break the plane of the goal line or is in the end zone. Can’t make it any more clear than that. Not going to debate it any further.
There’s pictures of him laying in the end zone after the pile was peeled away. His waste or more was in the end zone.

So no. They would’ve have and didn’t signal touchdown when that did happen.
https://ftw.usatoday.com/lists/cowboys-patriots-dak-prescott-td-missed-by-refs

As most of those tweets say “it was clearly a td”
Not really close and odd they “missed” that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G2

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,472
Reaction score
26,213
Don't debate then. The qb went into the endzone before going down and maintained possession of the ball after cleaning up the pile.

Because they couldn't see the ball initially is a ridiculous argument. He didn't magically break the laws of physics and somehow leave the ball behind, and then teleport it to his possession after going down. You're argument is ridiculous.
"But he could have been carrying it with his feet!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

DogFace

Carharris2
Messages
13,155
Reaction score
15,624
It should have been called a TD. I thought a ref called it. If they did then they would not have evidence to over turn it. But if they not call it then they would not have the evidence to change it. Perfect screw job by not calling it,
Yes. Someone was saying one ref signaled td. He was quieted. I guess. So no review.

Pretty weird “incompetence”.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,703
Reaction score
31,120
"The league" is never going to apologize for anything unless they have to. No TD ruled, no review required.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,050
Reaction score
29,909
Yes. Someone was saying one ref signaled td. He was quieted. I guess. So no review.

Pretty weird “incompetence”.
Was that the play MM challenged. There was no clear view and couldn’t be reversed if it was called a TD and was weird the refs that called it was silenced. Should have lined up McGovern as FB and rammed Elliot in.

Was the perfect screw job.
 

Mannix

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,691
Reaction score
10,822
Of course he had possession of the ball when they pulled the bodies off the pile, the problem was the ball wasn’t over the goal line or they would have signaled touchdown. We see it all the time where they pull bodies off a pile then signal touchdown if the ball has crossed the plane of the goal line. Not even Cowboys players were signaling touchdown after they pulled the bodies off the pile.
How could the ball have not been over when they unpiled...his waste was at the goal line.
 

Mannix

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,691
Reaction score
10,822

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
Are you seriously saying they couldn't see the ball once everyone was out of the way? I don't have access to the tape, but I'm pretty sure I remember seeing the ball well over the line when they pulled the pile apart.

They would have signal touchdown if they saw the ball in the endzone and Cowboys players would’ve also signaled touchdown.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
Don't debate then. The qb went into the endzone before going down and maintained possession of the ball after cleaning up the pile.

Because they couldn't see the ball initially is a ridiculous argument. He didn't magically break the laws of physics and somehow leave the ball behind, and then teleport it to his possession after going down. You're argument is ridiculous.

If it’s a ridiculous argument they would’ve reviewed it. Can’t believe some of you are still making such a big deal out of it when we won the game. Thank goodness the bye week is over. Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,367
Reaction score
35,386
There’s pictures of him laying in the end zone after the pile was peeled away. His waste or more was in the end zone.

So no. They would’ve have and didn’t signal touchdown when that did happen.
https://ftw.usatoday.com/lists/cowboys-patriots-dak-prescott-td-missed-by-refs

As most of those tweets say “it was clearly a td”
Not really close and odd they “missed” that.

They don’t care where his waist is, the ball has to be in the endzone. If the ball was in the endzone they would’ve signaled touchdown after unpiling the bodies.
 
Top