Pantone282C
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,794
- Reaction score
- 14,729
Plus, uncertainty about Maliek's injury status.Ya with Irving out for four games and the uncertainty along much of the back ups
I keep and extra there DL
Plus, uncertainty about Maliek's injury status.Ya with Irving out for four games and the uncertainty along much of the back ups
I keep and extra there DL
I don't know how you can say that without seeing Gregory in action after his layoff. Crawford isn't a stud, but I believe you are underrating him. He's not a slouch, either.I think Randy Gregory is a better RDE pass rushing option after his time away than the miscast Tyrone Crawford could ever be.
If this team is trotting Crawford out there at right end week one, we've made a serious mistake and are playing at a distinct disadvantage from the start.
At this point March-Lillard has provided more in this league on teams than either Ealy or Gregory has provided to a defense.
On talent alone, you have a great point. But in production, Ealy has essentially been the 2016 version of Benson Mayowa to this point in his career. Gregory has done even less.
I'm not cutting Ealy or Gregory to keep a journeyman like March-Lillard around. Both of those guys have pedigree and production in their history. And can have a much bigger impact than some special teams linebacker in what is already a ho-hum group outside of the starters.
I don't know how you can say that without seeing Gregory in action after his layoff. Crawford isn't a stud, but I believe you are underrating him. He's not a slouch, either.
What has Ealy done since the SB? And talent means nothing if you can't get on the field. I'm not going to pretend March-Lillard is some world beater, he's not. He may not even make the team. Debating Gregory is pointless until he gets reinstated anyway - which is not guaranteed.Really?
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MarcJu00.htm
And yet both more than March-Lillard. Who's been on nearly as many teams as games played. And who - despite this team's issues and injuries at linebacker - still couldn't get in the field.
Ealy was nearly a Super Bowl MVP, and Gregory has top-5 talent.
I'm not cutting either for a scrub who's bounced around half the league.
No way there are 7 LB's worth keeping while only going with 9 on the DL.
Right now NOBODY knows what or how Gregory will play after missing as long as he has. He's going to need to be spectacular to be given the benefit of the doubt on his trustworthiness on not getting suspended or banned again. If there are others that are playing as good or better than that trustworthiness factor will come into play.
.
Pretty much agree but only go 2QBs but 10DLs
What has Ealy done since the SB? And talent means nothing if you can't get on the field. I'm not going to pretend March-Lillard is some world beater, he's not. He may not even make the team. Debating Gregory is pointless until he gets reinstated anyway - which is not guaranteed.
Agreed. I tried to name 5 LBs on the team and couldn't do it.
A lot of talent, but a lot of uncertainty - what kind of playing condition is he in? Might need some time to get there. Crawford is a Swiss army knife of talent. Could do OK at the 1-tech DT.Right now NOBODY knows what or how Gregory will play after missing as long as he has. He's going to need to be spectacular to be given the benefit of the doubt on his trustworthiness on not getting suspended or banned again. If there are others that are playing as good or better than that trustworthiness factor will come into play.
.
That's speculation. He's got 1 career sack. He's got more failed drug tests than sacks. He better have a tremendous TC to earn a spot on the roster.I won't dispute trustworthiness, but if he's reinstated, that means he's passed "trust tests" for over a year. And they're keeping Irving, who can't pass those tests now.
Gregory has the talent and ability to be this team's best pass rush option at right defensive end.
It's not about March-Lillard. You could change March-Lillard to any current available FA LB with ST ability and it wouldn't change my point. You don't leave your ST in a bind because a guy might play someday and he was good in college.What has March-Lillard ever done?
If you can answer that, we can then compare it to the others.
When Irving is out he doesn't count against the number so you basically do get to keep an extra DL for those four weeks.
That's speculation. He's got 1 career sack. He's got more failed drug tests than sacks. He better have a tremendous TC to earn a spot on the roster.
It's not about March-Lillard. You could change March-Lillard to any current available FA LB with ST ability and it wouldn't change my point. You don't leave your ST in a bind because a guy might play someday and he was good in college.
It depends on what Gregory looks like after sitting out nearly two full seasons with drug suspensions. You don't make that decision now when you have no idea what he's going to be IF you get him back to practice.And you don't hurt your defense and pass rush for a special teams guy. Especially when special teams is being phased out of this league.
You certainly don't drop a talent like Randy Gregory for special teams.
It depends on what Gregory looks like after sitting out nearly two full seasons with drug suspensions. You don't make that decision now when you have no idea what he's going to be IF you get him back to practice.