thekavorka
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,787
- Reaction score
- 34
smarta5150;1716467 said:I loved the original post.
Wasn't very "original" since everyone talked about the absence of Henry and the negatives that would follow all week.
And then the game proved it.
I don't get how some members cannot see how Henry in the game would have been a positive impact.
Technically the game didn't prove anything.
All it proved was that our secondary sucked without Henry.
It didn't prove that our secondary would be good with Henry. In order to prove that, we'd have to play the Patriots again (or a good offensive team) with Henry in the game.