805BoysInBlue
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,378
- Reaction score
- 10,101
No team would trade for a broken qb with an inflated contract that hasn't even kicked in yet.
Denver made Wilson a post June 1 cut. They had to eat like 85 million in dead money over two years.my point is they took a huge hit
it's comparable that they took a "hit" sheesh, I don't care the dollar size, i'm focusing on the aspect that they took a hit. It's a huge hit we realize that!!Denver made Wilson a post June 1 cut. They had to eat like 85 million in dead money over two years.
If the Cowboys make Dak a June 1 cut, they’d have to eat 150 million in dead money.
So no, not comparable at all.
Now see, you bring facts to the thread.Denver made Wilson a post June 1 cut. They had to eat like 85 million in dead money over two years.
If the Cowboys make Dak a June 1 cut, they’d have to eat 150 million in dead money.
So no, not comparable at all.
OK so you bring in PRIME he's going to draft Shruder, because Mike has left will sign with New Orleans and Dak waves trade clause and you send Dak to NO for next 2 1st round picks. Dak is from Lousiana Mike Coached there its a Win win. Prime gets to keep coaching his sonYou draft a quarterback in the first round and you bench Dak.
It's pretty simple. I know the Jonses don't want to do that because it would imply they made a mistake, but knowing Dak, he's too proud to sit on the bench. He will eventually succumb to the fact that his career in Dallas is over. The NFL is a cold hearted business but the fact is Dak is one of the reasons this organization is in shambles.
1. Hire a head coach with a backbone
2. Empower that head coach
3. Draft a quarterback in the first round and move on.
A good QB? Are you blind? Torpedo the locker room? You actually think everyone in that locker room loves Dak and the way he plays QB, much less the money he makes while they eat bologna?You guys keep flailing around with bad ideas.
Sure, get rid of a known good QB for...a reach QB in a horrible draft for QBs. Torpedo the morale in the locker room by benching the guy they support and cripple your cap for years.
You're a born GM, really.
Vikings maybe. Aside from that I doubt anyone would bite.103 cap hit if traded pre June 1st. lol
42 dead this year, 61 mil dead next year if after June 1st.
Problem is even if he did drop the NTC, what team would want him/could make it work? His deal can be modified by the new team, but it's not like he's coming off a good year but needs a fresh start.
That or Las Vegas, and Dak may agree since Las Vegas has the same initials as Louis Vuitton.Vikings maybe. Aside from that I doubt anyone would bite.
I got nothing.You draft a quarterback in the first round and you bench Dak.
ok well in some trades the trading team takes on a lot of the money to make the trade go through easier, we can take most of the hit making it lower for the opposing team, and boom he's gone!!!!!!!!!!!Getting Dak to remove this no-trade clause isn't the problem. The real problem is trying to find a team that is willing to take on that insane contract. No way it's going to happen and drafting a guy now is simply going to waste 3 of the 4 years of his rookie contract fielding a horrible team because of Dak's albatross contract killing the team.
sounds like a planI got nothing.