Here's how you get Dak to remove his no trade clause

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
62,061
Reaction score
95,974
it's comparable that they took a "hit" sheesh, I don't care the dollar size, i'm focusing on the aspect that they took a hit. It's a huge hit we realize that!!
Huh? The dollar size absolutely matters. Denver took the hit because they could. Dallas can't take the hit because it's basically DOUBLE what the Broncos took.

Put it another way, if Wilson had the same contract as Dak, Denver also couldn't have cut him when they did, they would have have to wait a year, at least.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
62,061
Reaction score
95,974
ok well in some trades the trading team takes on a lot of the money to make the trade go through easier, we can take most of the hit making it lower for the opposing team, and boom he's gone!!!!!!!!!!!
You really don't seem to understand how any of this works. What do you mean we can take "most of the hit"?
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,148
Reaction score
23,758
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan

FanofJerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,553
Reaction score
1,376
News alert...

Dak is good enough

Coaching hasn't been

Rage bait recipe for a dirt bag God
 

Johannes44

Well-Known Member
Messages
326
Reaction score
477
ok well in some trades the trading team takes on a lot of the money to make the trade go through easier, we can take most of the hit making it lower for the opposing team, and boom he's gone!!!!!!!!!!!
Minnesota might be open to that. Plus it has some degree of symmetry to send him there.
 

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,971
Reaction score
48,596
103 cap hit if traded pre June 1st. lol

42 dead this year, 61 mil dead next year if after June 1st.

Problem is even if he did drop the NTC, what team would want him/could make it work? His deal can be modified by the new team, but it's not like he's coming off a good year but needs a fresh start.
Why do posters ask this question every month or so? What's done is done.......getting rid of Dak over the next couple of years would set us back even further. It nearly guarantees the next two losing seasons.......wasting Lamb and Parsons talent.
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,148
Reaction score
23,758
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Why do posters ask this question every month or so? What's done is done.......getting rid of Dak over the next couple of years would set us back even further. It nearly guarantees the next two losing seasons.......wasting Lamb and Parsons talent.
What exactly would happen Hawk?? We'd miss the playoffs, we'd NOT win the Superbowl?? Not go to the NFC championship game??? Lol, that would suck!! Sheesh
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,644
Reaction score
32,455
You draft a quarterback in the first round and you bench Dak.


It's pretty simple. I know the Jonses don't want to do that because it would imply they made a mistake, but knowing Dak, he's too proud to sit on the bench. He will eventually succumb to the fact that his career in Dallas is over. The NFL is a cold hearted business but the fact is Dak is one of the reasons this organization is in shambles.

1. Hire a head coach with a backbone

2. Empower that head coach

3. Draft a quarterback in the first round and move on.
This should have been done last offseason before the draft.

Now it is almost impossible.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
62,061
Reaction score
95,974
Uhhhh I just went to the minnesota vikings a few minutes ago while being in Pennsylvania at the current moment and asked them!!!! Teams have done it before


just typed in into Google and dang! Dang coog lol


https://www.google.com/search?q=nfl...E3NDg1ajBqN6gCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Your link is looking at this from the team's perspective. If they want to trade a player, they have to be willing to take on the dead cap charge. You can't trade away dead money. You make a trade, you have to account for that dead money. So when trading a player, the team has to be willing to take on any dead money created due to the transaction. You don't have the option of moving any of that to the team trading for said player.

But above you seemingly think that the Cowboys can somehow trade away dead cap money but if they are willing to eat much of it, they can make the trade easier. That's not how this works. The only thing the Cowboys could do is agree to pay some of the future cash that would be owed to Dak but that just increases their already LARGE dead money hit.
 

irishline

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,848
Reaction score
4,329
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
You draft a quarterback in the first round and you bench Dak.


It's pretty simple. I know the Jonses don't want to do that because it would imply they made a mistake, but knowing Dak, he's too proud to sit on the bench. He will eventually succumb to the fact that his career in Dallas is over. The NFL is a cold hearted business but the fact is Dak is one of the reasons this organization is in shambles.

1. Hire a head coach with a backbone

2. Empower that head coach

3. Draft a quarterback in the first round and move on.
You are assuming another team would want to take on that contract. Not so sure about that.

No team would trade for a broken qb with an inflated contract that hasn't even kicked in yet.
Nope.
 

csirl

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,959
Reaction score
4,272
Minnesota might be open to that. Plus it has some degree of symmetry to send him there.
Vikings have 3 x QBs who are better than Dak on their roster. Even if Darnold goes, they only have room for Dak as emergency 3rd QB/practise squad. Not happening.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,574
Reaction score
33,566
You draft a quarterback in the first round and you bench Dak.


It's pretty simple. I know the Jonses don't want to do that because it would imply they made a mistake, but knowing Dak, he's too proud to sit on the bench. He will eventually succumb to the fact that his career in Dallas is over. The NFL is a cold hearted business but the fact is Dak is one of the reasons this organization is in shambles.

1. Hire a head coach with a backbone

2. Empower that head coach

3. Draft a quarterback in the first round and move on.
Ive said it since last season

Hes not “too proud” but it will be a constant source of embarrassment so he will agree to be traded on his terms

The Joneses will never do it
 

noshame

I'm not dead yet......
Messages
15,184
Reaction score
13,783
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
You draft a quarterback in the first round and you bench Dak.


It's pretty simple. I know the Jonses don't want to do that because it would imply they made a mistake, but knowing Dak, he's too proud to sit on the bench. He will eventually succumb to the fact that his career in Dallas is over. The NFL is a cold hearted business but the fact is Dak is one of the reasons this organization is in shambles.

1. Hire a head coach with a backbone

2. Empower that head coach

3. Draft a quarterback in the first round and move on.
If you draft a quarterback in the first round, you won't even have competition, because Dak is not going to step on the field with another quarterback. it will just show his real skill level. the last thing he wants to do is advertise that .
He'll be looking for a trade.
 

TexasBacon

Well-Known Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
1,667
103 cap hit if traded pre June 1st. lol

42 dead this year, 61 mil dead next year if after June 1st.

Problem is even if he did drop the NTC, what team would want him/could make it work? His deal can be modified by the new team, but it's not like he's coming off a good year but needs a fresh start.
You'd probably have to do what Houston did with Watson and give a team a high pick and Dak to take on the contract.
 
Top