Risen Star
Likes Collector
- Messages
- 87,320
- Reaction score
- 205,707
so which is. i didn't watch the combine and only do cursory searches
http://www.nfl.com/combine/participants
That will have their measurements from the combine.
so which is. i didn't watch the combine and only do cursory searches
I keep hearing we can't afford this guy, we can't afford that guy. Let's draft 2 more, and then what? Those two could be busts, so where does that leave us? All of our money is spent on Dez stone Hands Bryant, Jason stone Legs Witten, and our wonderful offensive line who couldn't protect a mouse from a block of cheese. Good work Cowboys.
I'm guessing you didn't see their work last year? Whether you like the QB or not, he ran for his life for the better part of last year.You had me until the offensive line.
So Walters was clearly wrong on 1, but the rest seem to be somewhat appropriate.
neither are lb's. and why are we talking money when discussing draft picks? i think that lb is a bigger need myself, but derwin is head and shoulders a better player than either of them. i'd be happy with roquan or edmunds, would not like to trade up for them though.
Brugler and Broaddus both disagree with you my friend.
YepI'm guessing you didn't see their work last year? Whether you like the QB or not, he ran for his life for the better part of last year.
yeah? as far as him being a better player? is this based off a big board, or something they've said? Derwin just seems like he's being overlooked for some odd reason. Which feels weird.
If you look in on the DC.com site and get some time on the draft show, you would know who they think are the top 10-15 players in this draft.
If you've followed the Cowboys for years, they have never drafted high or paid big money to the safety position. This goes all the way back to
the Landry years. They tend to fund the safety position from the 4th round of the draft on back to UDFA. Just the way they roll.
9 mil tho?
I think he's also a poor fit size/durability wise in a 3-4. I'm sure they see him as being a better fit coverage wise in their defense but I just don't see how he holds up.That is stupid. I've been a fan of Hitchens but he is not an elite player.
I'm not in this debate, but it's always better if Broaddus disagrees with your opinion because he is wrong more than 50% of the time. If your opinion is always the opposite of Broaddus, then you're probably correct 75+ percent of the time.Brugler and Broaddus both disagree with you my friend.
Good point.I think he's also a poor fit size/durability wise in a 3-4. I'm sure they see him as being a better fit coverage wise in their defense but I just don't see how he holds up.
I'm not in this debate, but it's always better if Broaddus disagrees with your opinion because he is wrong more than 50% of the time. If your opinion is always the opposite of Broaddus, then you're probably correct 75+ percent of the time.