No. We need depth and he is under contract through 2025.This was a Broaddus question that I think is interesting.
If you're weeks into camp and you feel good about the rookie OL are you willing to trade T.J. Bass (who Broaddus believes the league missed on and should have been drafted) for DL depth and DT in particular?
I guess the obvious answer is it depends on who that DL is, so let me tweak it. If you feel good about those rookies weeks into camp are you looking to trade Bass for a comparable DT?
Broaddus believes you'd get a nice player back. Which is the point here. It's not like he wants to trade Bass.I like Bass, but what exactly are we going to get back in return for trading TJ Bass? I’d say pretty much nothing of much use right now. I’d rather keep Bass as you need backup OL and Martin won’t be around much longer.
We need DEPTH, WHY do yall always want to trade good and decent depth that we have, then complain when there is an injury or something and we are thin!!??This was a Broaddus question that I think is interesting.
If you're weeks into camp and you feel good about the rookie OL are you willing to trade T.J. Bass (who Broaddus believes the league missed on and should have been drafted) for DL depth and DT in particular?
I guess the obvious answer is it depends on who that DL is, so let me tweak it. If you feel good about those rookies weeks into camp are you looking to trade Bass for a comparable DT?
If anything trade some of our 11 picks next year. Preferably after the 4th round.It would be robbing Peter to pay Paul. TJ Bass is our top interior OL backup. Top 100 pick or equivalent DT then sure but Bass is in the second year of a UDFA contract.
You are making Hoffman and Edoga your primary backups and that seems about the same as at DT with Rogers, Fehoko, and Golston backing up.
Broaddus is generally clueless and may be off in this instance as well. Right now our OL is two rookies who have never played an NFL snap, Steele who while he improved later in the year was poor last year, Martin who is a legend but has maybe a couple years left and Tyler. If Bass is as good as many hope he is there is a good chance we may need him. But, getting back to the original point, we aren't likely to get more in return for him than he can provide to the team if needed IMOBroaddus believes you'd get a nice player back. Which is the point here. It's not like he wants to trade Bass.
Bass played a little and looked decent against bad teams. We might get lucky and get more than expected for him but it is doubtful. He really has proven nothing yet so his value is not all that.Broaddus is generally clueless and may be off in this instance as well. Right now our OL is two rookies who have never played an NFL snap, Steele who while he improved later in the year was poor last year, Martin who is a legend but has maybe a couple years left and Tyler. If Bass is as good as many hope he is there is a good chance we may need him. But, getting back to the original point, we aren't likely to get more in return for him than he can provide to the team if needed IMO
Slightly off topic here, but I ask your thoughts out of respect.I don't disagree. I just don't trust this FO to find a DT in a trade with the equivalent value as Bass.
They would trade Bass for a Carl Davis.
I think Carl Davis is exactly what he is, a journeyman. He’s 32 and played for 7 NFL teams. He’s not expensive (or he wouldn’t be here) but teams keep moving on from him. Usually, good-sized and affordable run-stuffing 1Techs are someone you hold onto. I think he got close to 30 snaps last year against Buffalo, Miami, and Detroit, and I do not think he played well at all.Slightly off topic here, but I ask your thoughts out of respect.
What do you think of Davis? Apparently not much. How about the 7th rounder Joseph, and/or the DT situation as a whole?
I can’t see how anyone looks at the DT situation and figures it’s well on its way to improvement. The fact that it was barely addressed, and they wouldn’t even pony up a few million for Hankins tells me the FO figures they have already invested heavily with a first round pick last year and are counting on Mazi to make major strides. They seem to value the trenches on one side of the ball much more than the other.
How are they winning games when they can’t get out to a big lead?
Give me Ball or Waletzko instead of Chump Edoga. Hell, a cadaver would be better than Chump.You can NEVER have enough depth on the offensive line, and until they put pads on and actually play games, I'm not placing too much stock into rookies....
Edoga might not make the roster....Ball, Waletzko can't stay healthy and are on their last legs with this team....Martin might be in his last year in Dallas.
So as it stands right now, these are my ten...Guyton, Smith, Beebe, Martin, Steele slated to start
Bass(guard/center), Richards, Hoffman, Edoga, Thomas(project)
The mistake Dallas made with Edoga is playing him at tackle, he's a guard, that's where he should have been playing last year, not TackleGive me Ball or Waletzko instead of Chump Edoga. Hell, a cadaver would be better than Chump.
Zimmer is not GM or Head of Scouting.It'll be up to Zimmer to do what he feels is necessary to serve his defensive responsibilities as the needs dictate. It's a new ballgame with him in the DC position. I think the FO will continue to respect his opinions just as they have thus far in their actions. DTs will become available in the final cuts, just as they have been in the past. Hopefully, some practical decisions will be implemented. I think Will McClay will know enough to recommend that a capable DT might be taken when the time comes to actually do something. It's high time for Jerry & Son to earn their keep.