It's that "losing to ultimately win" idea, like tanking.
And of course, the OP's fanhood must be called into question.
I have one question for those questioning the OP's fanhood. Have you ever seen a franchise like this one in the NFL? The owner plans a set up question on the radio to go on a 3.5 minute explanation of why he is the best choice for the GM. Not even Crazy Al at his craziest does that.
So, if you've never seen anything like this, might non traditional thinking enter into fanhood? What's the first thing you have to consider when considering the Cowboys? The HC? The QB? Or damage control on the GM?
I am hoping the Rams beat them soundly, the Eagles even more soundly and they lose to the Skins to top it off. This season needs to be topped off for this egomaniacal incompetent to realize his team has bottomed out. He must be despondent, embarrassed and willing to at least acquiesce control to the HC on what he should control, the coaches and players.
But here's what's wrong with my thinking, it's deadass wrong. It is not in this person to admit they are the problem, to the contrary, he will think he is the only solution as he "so eloquently" described on the radio interview. And who in the hell do you think controls the questions in those interviews?
So, attack my fanhood, because I two upped the OP with two additional losses because while it is probably wrong, it is my only hope that this team gets fixed. Some like to use the term "locker room cancer" to describe some players but that is reserved for only person on that team and it is terminal. The only way this can get fixed is for him to be gone. And not gone like off on the boat, gone like really gone.