I think dallas is , or at least = to opponents.
kyler and dak are about the same, and I think we had more talent at WR and te.
SF, again about the same, although this deebo guy is pretty good, but look at how they use him. They just utilized their good players better.
Jimmy and dak are about the same , and again our wr talent is better, just not used correctly.
Team to team, the talent in the NFL is fairly evenly spread out, which is the way it's designed, with the draft ordering. Certainly there are teams that have more talented players than others, but like you said, it's how that talent is utilized. Why else do people talk about the "innovative" coaches?
Winning the SB, despite the Pats' run, is very hard. The Steelers have been in the playoffs 7 times in the 13 years since they won their last SB, yet they've only made the conference championship once in that span. The Packers have had the no. 1 seed three years in a row yet haven't even made the SB, let alone won it.
Takes more than talented players. Whether Dallas has had lots of talent or not, it's clearly evident they have had neither the coaching nor the front office that's needed for rings....