kingwhicker
BCRSA
- Messages
- 3,290
- Reaction score
- 0
It's not even funny how badly outcoached Stoops was in the final minutes and OT of that game. Chris Petersen made him look like a foolish Bobby Bowden clone.
I disagree, he is a good coach but I don't forsee him making the transition to the NFL with the results that would be expected from him.mr.jameswoods;1281170 said:This is funny. He was hired in 1999. Since then he was won a National Championship, been to 2 National Championship games, a Rose Bowl and a Fiesta Bowl......and it's not like he took over Miami or Florida. OU was in the dumps and had lost to Baylor once under John Blake.
I don't mind someone saying we shouldn't hire him because the NFL is a different game as college success doesn't necessarily translate to success in the NFL. But for someone to say that he has not performed to the enormous expectations required of him is ridiculous.
Aikbach;1281184 said:I disagree, he is a good coach but I don't forsee him making the transition to the NFL with the results that would be expected from him.
If expectations are as low of him as you claim, which they are not since it is OU for heaven's sake, the fall off was an exception to the rule of their tradition. Losing to Baylor at that time was not dishonorable 1996 was when the Baylor program hit a funk it has yet to climb out of, it had been a contender throughout the South West Conference days but floundered out of bowl contention some ten years ago.
Blake didn't cut it but people forget that Baylor was not the Vanderbilt of the Big 12 it is now at that time, it was more like Texas Tech.Natedawg44;1281194 said:People forget how bad John Blake was. In that Baylor game they were driving for a field goal near the end of the 1st half. Their 3rd down pass was short. They had 30 seconds left. Plenty of time to bring on the field goal unit. Blake had them spike the ball to stop the clock. IT WAS 4th FRICKING DOWN. Ball over on downs. That was the Blake tenure in a nutshell.
mr.jameswoods;1281182 said:I don't want a puppet like Dave Campo but I wouldn't mind if Dallas was off the radar by hiring a humble and "under-the-radar" assistant NFL coach like the Eagles did with Andy Reid. We need to go back to basics. We need a coach who can draft and coach offensive lineman. I think we are too defensive minded. We really need some coaches who can coach fundamental offense not gimmicky or tricky offenses. Guys who can do the basics like teaching guys how to block properly.
Aikbach;1281197 said:Blake didn't cut it but people forget that Baylor was not the Vanderbilt of the Big 12 it is now at that time, it was more like Texas Tech.
I would've expected that of A&M.Natedawg44;1281202 said:But incompetence is incompetence no matter who you are playing. SPIKE the ball on 4th down to stop the clock. Are you kidding me?
Aikbach;1281197 said:Blake didn't cut it but people forget that Baylor was not the Vanderbilt of the Big 12 it is now at that time, it was more like Texas Tech.
Alamo Bowl 1994, Co-South West Conference Champions. They haven't had a winning season since 1996 however.mr.jameswoods;1281209 said:HUH? Texas Tech has won bowl games. I can't recall the last time Baylor went to a bowl game let alone won one.
Natedawg44;1281202 said:But incompetence is incompetence no matter who you are playing. SPIKE the ball on 4th down to stop the clock. Are you kidding me?
He was a good d-line coach for Dallas however.mr.jameswoods;1281215 said:Oh god, why did you just remind me of that. I was so embarrassed by that. Blake would also ask guys to retun punts from inside the 10 yard line instead of calling for a fair catch. I can't remember how many times the punt returner would drop the punt while the other team would get possession. It was a regular occurrence. That was totally John Blake
Aikbach;1281212 said:Alamo Bowl 1994, Co-South West Conference Champions. They haven't had a winning season since 1996 however.
Tech is also the only Big 12 team never to experience a losing season since the birth of the conference.
Again, you like to argue but that was the beginning of the decline but alright if you say so.mr.jameswoods;1281222 said:John Blake coached OU from 96-98 when Baylor was terrible so they were not decent by any means back then.
Aikbach;1281225 said:Again, you like to argue but that was the beginning of the decline but alright if you say so.
I'm confused, no one defended Blake. Simply said he had some talent on the roster in place for Stoops. If you decide to rip into me on a message board it won't phase me, just a light hearted discussion.mr.jameswoods;1281235 said:Dude, I'm not the one reaching for straws by arguing that Baylor was a decent team when they beat OU to justify John Blake as a decent coach. I'm much more mellow than I was otherwise, I would have ripped into you 3 posts ago for making such ridiculous statement. Ask Dale or Brainpaint
Aikbach;1281236 said:I'm confused, no one defended Blake. Simply said he had some talent on the roster in place for Stoops. If you decide to rip into me on a message board it won't phase me, just a light hearted discussion.
They became terrible right about thethe first two years of Big 12 play and have never been able to field a talented enough club to finsh off opponents.mr.jameswoods;1281249 said:But the point is he didn't recruit enough talent to justify a national championship in Stoosp 2nd year. There was plenty of evidence for that as he was forced to converting RB's to wide receivers because they didn't have enough receivers. He was also forced to starting an undersized junior college transfer with a weak arm that was barely 6ft tall.
And I'm confused as well. You say that Baylor was decent in 1994. You admit that they were terrible when they joined the Big 12 in 1996. Blake coached from 1996-1998. They didn't have a winning record in any of those seasons. How was Baylor similar to Texas Tech then if they didn't even have a winning record then?
Aikbach;1281252 said:They became terrible right about thethe first two years of Big 12 play and have never been able to field a talented enough club to finsh off opponents.
They were like Tech up until that point in the sense that they consistently were an 8 and 9 win team that went to the Independe Bowl or the Liberty Bowl and occasionally the Cotton Bowl back when it was a prestige bowl.
But alas after the inception of the super conference the recruiting dryed up and the memory of Grant Teaff faded to the background.
You guys should quit arguing long enough to realize you're arguing about the wrong thing. It's not wether Stoops is a good coach, he is, the question is, was John Blake the worst head coach in the history of football.mr.jameswoods;1281170 said:This is funny. He was hired in 1999. Since then he was won a National Championship, been to 2 National Championship games, a Rose Bowl and a Fiesta Bowl......and it's not like he took over Miami or Florida. OU was in the dumps and had lost to Baylor once under John Blake.
I don't mind someone saying we shouldn't hire him because the NFL is a different game as college success doesn't necessarily translate to success in the NFL. But for someone to say that he has not performed to the enormous expectations required of him is ridiculous.