superpunk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,330
- Reaction score
- 75
Mike 1967 said:What about Noah
Well, Noah, Enoch, Abram, there were various servants of God before the nation of Israel, but you're right, I misspoke. :
Mike 1967 said:What about Noah
superpunk said:Excellent point. Noah's folly there, resulted in one of his sons' being punished, for 'laying bare his fathers nakedness'. More than just Noah was affected there.
superpunk said:Drinking and driving.....:beer1::nono2:
Mike 1967 said:yep...that effected generations.
That particular son was cursed....and the curse impacted generations if I remember correctly.
You should have just killed the cop, couldn't have been much worse.Hoov said:yes, but after a w/e in jail, a 2 year suspension, over 5,000 of fines and court costs and having to operate my car for a year with a breathalizer ignition interlock and pay another 1,000 for that interlock plus pay highway robbery for auto insurance i think ive paid my dues on that one.
superpunk said:yes, Canaan. Which resulted in him being a "slave to his brother Shem" (Gen 9:26) and eventually ending up in that state - i.e. the nation of Israel conquering the land of Canaan.
superpunk said:Hoov,
Ouch, tough break. Don't know how much the fine would have been, but you probably would've felt fantastic. Of course, there is that whole "contempt of court" thing.
Hoov said:yeah, i would have felt great....but it definitely would have been contempt of court and probably at least another 1,000.
At any rate, no more drinking and driving for me. Thats one thing i like about living where i am now, i can walk in 5 minutes to main street and there are about 50 bars and restaurants in halfmile strip.
That breathalizer is a big time pain though, ive had my car not start at 6am cause of drinking the night before and had to run and catch a bus to get to work.
Mike 1967 said:Very cool !
It is rare to find Christians that know the Old Testemant....much less the Bible at all.
superpunk said:Isn't that what our beliefs and morals are SUPPOSED to be based on? LOL. I know what you're talking about though. Very few people actually open the bible up, and examine what it has to say for themselves. Many would rather just listen to what they're told, rather than investigate themselves. I'd rather be like the "noble minded Beroeans" who "received the word with the greatest eagerness of mind, carefully examining the Scriptures daily as to whether these things were so." (Acts 17:11)
superpunk said:Isn't that what our beliefs and morals are SUPPOSED to be based on? LOL. I know what you're talking about though. Very few people actually open the bible up, and examine what it has to say for themselves. Many would rather just listen to what they're told, rather than investigate themselves. I'd rather be like the "noble minded Beroeans" who "received the word with the greatest eagerness of mind, carefully examining the Scriptures daily as to whether these things were so." (Acts 17:11)
superpunk said:That's what separates us from the animals, no doubt.
But we do have to be careful about following our conscience, because it is a realative thing.Mike 1967 said:Yes, that is definitely what a "Christians" morals and beliefs should be based on.
As well as the law written on our hearts (concience) that Paul refers to in Romans 1.
I'm obviously a bit late arriving to this thread but I have to say that this is probably the best post I've read in my time here at this board (apart from the numerous enlightening posts written by jem88 of course!)iceberg said:the trouble is, it's been "illegal" for so long and has had so many misconceptions about it over the years.
marajuana doesn't lead to harder drugs, the desire to do drugs leads to harder drugs. marajuana just gets rid of the junk in your fridge that's been sitting there as a science experiment for quite some time but may taste ok just the same.
"reefer madness" - if there was ever a load of hammered moose manure, this is it. getting all energetic and crazy after smoking it? hardly. well, unless taking 10 minutes to reach for the remote then not knowing why is just whacky.
and it's been villianized most all of our lives. those who have not already put that aside and tried it will likely have a negative outlook on it and those who use it.
w/alcohol, people go nuts, drive around and kill people, get into arguments, blow out livers (wonder how much of mine is left anymore - it grows back, right???) but w/weed you just sit around and waste time.
maybe too much of it - that IS a valid concern.
now - what if an NFL player went to amsterdam - could they THEN smoke and it be "ok"? i tend to doubt it because i'd think the policy is NO WEED, not NO WEED WHERE ILLEGAL. but since irvin isn't in the NFL, what would his work say?
in jobs where you're not required to be 24x7 i think a drug law is an invasion of privacy. when i go to best buy and see they're drug free, it does my heart wonders to know that the pimple-faced kid who put the cd's out didn't get high last night.
right, WHO CARES? and why would NOT smoking be a pre-req for a job like this? policeman, fireman, doctor on call - sure. if you may have to "go to work" then you'd better be straight and able to. otherwise, what people do with their own lives is their own business.
smoking and driving - would it bug me if someone was high and ran into my truck because of it? well, no more than the **(#*($&*(*(&@(*$ idiots who must talk on their cell phone and cut over 4 lanes because they're about to miss a turn, drive slow because they're busy talking on the phone and doing hand motions with the other hand leaving the rest of us to wonder what they're driving with.
in short, i don't care what michael does or where. but if illegal and he gets caught, then pay the standard fare and move about your life - that's the law and i'm ok with that.
instead people want to be judge and jury and express a standard of life for others i sincerely doubt they'd hold to for themselves.
now if he was pulled over where legal, then we'd probably never know because he'd just be sent on his way.