DemonBlood
Active Member
- Messages
- 965
- Reaction score
- 62
ITT: People who like to argue...Argue.
DemonBlood;3019892 said:ITT: People who like to argue...Argue.
rkell87;3019868 said:i replied twice don't know if you saw the first reply
i did not assume you meant something more, in response to your original post i bolded the part i responded to and said let people assume what they will,you replied to me about my response to another poster which is what really started this whole convo.
also i haven't got upset once and why do you keep bringing up that you were talking to him not me? if you don't want to talk to me don't. you replied to me about what i said to another poster yet keep telling me that what you said to OP doesn't concern me.
i actually thought about that statement today running errands, what i should have said and meant to say was that,just because he used the term when talking about a black man does not automatically mean he meant it racially. period. nor does it automatically mean that he could have meant it that way. it is a word that is just in some peoples vocab, and people use it just to use it, not that they should but some just do and mean nothing by it.
the whole thing is that if you know someone or are speaking face to face you can pretty much tell how they mean something but here over the Internet you just cant know unless they make it clear and people should not get upset but if they do let them cause they will anyway about any other thing.
its like all the outrage over the twins in transformers 2 if you want to see something a certain way you will and there is nothing anyone can do about it or anything that will change peoples mind about what they think the creators and writers meant by it
DemonBlood;3019892 said:ITT: People who like to argue...Argue.
the only reason he used the term "ghetto" was because Rodney is a black man.rkell87;3019871 said:i know i wont change your feeling on it but out of curiosity may i ask why?
rkell87;3019871 said:i know i wont change your feeling on it but out of curiosity may i ask why?
Rampage;3020138 said:the only reason he used the term "ghetto" was because Rodney is a black man.
tyke1doe;3020143 said:As a black man, I'll answer why it would be considered offensive.
It underscores a belief in many people's minds that black people don't measure up, that black people don't have the education or the intellect to handle certain jobs, including commentator.
So when one expresses himself in a way that any other player who is white would explain himself, immediately negative images of "ghetto" spring to mind.
It's something blacks have always had to overcome.
We can't get angry like a white employee can on the job, otherwise, we're viewed as the "angry black man" or ready to get "gansta" on someone.
We can't talk on the phone at work or come in late like other whites can otherwise we're considered "lazy." And that perception of laziness is not just singular. It is projected on to us as a race.
So when Harrison says something like "Brady needs to take off the dress" (a comment likely uttered by men of all ethnicities in a male-dominated culture like sports), immediately the image of him saying it involves race. Hence the term, "ghetto," which is commonly associated in American culture with black people.
That's why it offends blacks because no matter what we do, when we do something negative, there's always a judgment of us based on our race - even though people say they aren't criticizing us because of our race. But when people use terms associated with race, that's how we interpret it.
Now, maybe the user of the term doesn't mean it in that way. And I grant CFS88 that maybe he didn't use it that way. But those of us who know how it has been used in a particular context will draw conclusions.
By the way, I'm not offended by it because I have a thicker skin and what CFS88 says doesn't affect my life. But I still can acknowledge why many blacks would be offended by the statement.
I'm not speaking for Rampage. I'm just giving you a reason why such a term, applied the way it was applied, would be offensive to some if not most blacks.
tyke1doe;3020143 said:As a black man, I'll answer why it would be considered offensive.
It underscores a belief in many people's minds that black people don't measure up, that black people don't have the education or the intellect to handle certain jobs, including commentator.
So when one expresses himself in a way that any other player who is white would explain himself, immediately negative images of "ghetto" spring to mind.
It's something blacks have always had to overcome.
We can't get angry like a white employee can on the job, otherwise, we're viewed as the "angry black man" or ready to get "gansta" on someone.
We can't talk on the phone at work or come in late like other whites can otherwise we're considered "lazy." And that perception of laziness is not just singular. It is projected on to us as a race.
So when Harrison says something like "Brady needs to take off the dress" (a comment likely uttered by men of all ethnicities in a male-dominated culture like sports), immediately the image of him saying it involves race. Hence the term, "ghetto," which is commonly associated in American culture with black people.
That's why it offends blacks because no matter what we do, when we do something negative, there's always a judgment of us based on our race - even though people say they aren't criticizing us because of our race. But when people use terms associated with race, that's how we interpret it.
Now, maybe the user of the term doesn't mean it in that way. And I grant CFS88 that maybe he didn't use it that way. But those of us who know how it has been used in a particular context will draw conclusions.
By the way, I'm not offended by it because I have a thicker skin and what CFS88 says doesn't affect my life. But I still can acknowledge why many blacks would be offended by the statement.
I'm not speaking for Rampage. I'm just giving you a reason why such a term, applied the way it was applied, would be offensive to some if not most blacks.
DemonBlood;3019930 said:
rkell87;3020588 said:thanks for the insight, but i am fully aware of why it could be considered offensive, i wanted to know why he was offended.
listen i know it seems like I'm arguing just to as someone pointed out but i just hate when people read too much into what someone says without knowing what was truly meant by it. while i agree he most likely used the term because Harrison is black, but i doubt he meant it to offend, i assume with 88 in his name he is 20 or 21 and while i am that age and i don't use the term loosely i acknowledge that alot of my peers do, and the word doesn't carry the same weight it once did. now i don't know how old you and rampage are so it might still carry some weight in ya'lls mind idk.
also i know you just warned him to be aware of the term he was using. i (in response to your post) was simply saying just be clear on how you mean it and don't worry about what other people think. if he were to use the N word i have no problem with it, that is to say i have no problem with him saying the word because he wants to use it(i hate that word btw) just as long as he is clear about what he is saying when using it so there can be no gray area, that way when you hear it you can do whatever you see fit about it. everybody has a right to an opinion whether or not we like it or not, I'm just a member of the **** what people think, you do you and I'll do me line of thinking.
i don't know what part of the country you live in but i advise going somewhere else if you have to walk on eggshells to avoid a stereotype that you don't want, every place i have worked the 'angry black guy' is just a joke used when a black co worker gets angry most often used by said co worker first. my experience is that young 'punks'( you know with the spiked hair tats and piercings everywhere) are the most commonly angry people and anybody that does drugs(regardless of race) are the lazy ones.
i don't know what your experiences are but i really do not see anybody outside being racist, believing that a race of people cant handle certain jobs because they are not intelligent enough to do so, i would think that is a pretty foreign thought in most people in this day and age
juck;3020601 said:Im not racist,I hate everyone equally.White,black,yellow.There are negatives and plusses to everyone regardless of color.And some colors are more partial to do certain things.
rkell87;3020588 said:thanks for the insight, but i am fully aware of why it could be considered offensive, i wanted to know why he was offended.
listen i know it seems like I'm arguing just to as someone pointed out but i just hate when people read too much into what someone says without knowing what was truly meant by it. while i agree he most likely used the term because Harrison is black, but i doubt he meant it to offend, i assume with 88 in his name he is 20 or 21 and while i am that age and i don't use the term loosely i acknowledge that alot of my peers do, and the word doesn't carry the same weight it once did. now i don't know how old you and rampage are so it might still carry some weight in ya'lls mind idk.
also i know you just warned him to be aware of the term he was using. i (in response to your post) was simply saying just be clear on how you mean it and don't worry about what other people think. if he were to use the N word i have no problem with it, that is to say i have no problem with him saying the word because he wants to use it(i hate that word btw) just as long as he is clear about what he is saying when using it so there can be no gray area, that way when you hear it you can do whatever you see fit about it. everybody has a right to an opinion whether or not we like it or not, I'm just a member of the **** what people think, you do you and I'll do me line of thinking.
i don't know what part of the country you live in but i advise going somewhere else if you have to walk on eggshells to avoid a stereotype that you don't want, every place i have worked the 'angry black guy' is just a joke used when a black co worker gets angry most often used by said co worker first. my experience is that young 'punks'( you know with the spiked hair tats and piercings everywhere) are the most commonly angry people and anybody that does drugs(regardless of race) are the lazy ones.
i don't know what your experiences are but i really do not see anybody outside being racist, believing that a race of people cant handle certain jobs because they are not intelligent enough to do so, i would think that is a pretty foreign thought in most people in this day and age
tyke1doe;3020731 said:Actually, you're doing the arguing for him. I didn't go on and on about it with CFS88. I issued a simple admonition, and that was that. You decided to come to his defense. If you had not, this would have ended before it began.
Oh, and, no, it's not a foreign concept. I have white friends and co-workers who've attended parties and gatherings where there are only whites, and they have some interesting stories to tell.
You guys are always "offended" however.Stereotypes exist on both sides for a reason.Face it.Always will.Avaj;3020959 said:It is amazing to me, I'm black, when white people tell us how we are suppose to feel. If one of us said we are offended by what the OP said why do we have to explain ourselves or justify why we feel that way.
Do you have to explain everytime you are offended??
Since I'm not a supporter I have these ads and the one under you're post is "Black Singles Chat". Seemed extremely funny in this thread.juck;3021130 said:You guys are always "offended" however.Stereotypes exist on both sides for a reason.Face it.Always will.
oh so he should act like a white man?CowboysFanSince88;3021219 said:Well as a black man I was bothered a bit by the way Rodney handled himself on TV and felt it needed to tone it down a bit. He needs tips from Michael Wilboun and James Brown.