I wish we had Justin Fields

Captain43Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,456
Reaction score
7,713
There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get an equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.
Is this a joke!
Dak has his issues, but Fields is not in Dak’s class as a QB.

Did you watch the game?
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,039
Reaction score
3,844
There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get an equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.
Dak is a consensus top 10 QB. There is serious questions as to whether Fields is a top 30 QB. All the problems with Lance exist with Fields except Fields has less of an arm.
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,039
Reaction score
3,844
Having a great owner and organization doesn't guarantee you constant success year after year after year.

It's the same organization that's won 2 superbowls and played in 6 conference championship games this century, which means quite a lot considering that was during Tom Brady's peak years. We haven't sniffed a single Conference Championship Game...against lower competition.


They are unquestionably and unanimously considered a top notch, well respected, stable organization, and well within the Top 10 Teams this century as far as success.

We...are not ...obviously....as very few teams are lower on the totem pole than us when it comes to success this century, when playoff success is factored in. We're in a small group that haven't even gone to a conference championship game.

Hope that answers your question (spoiler alert..... it does)
If anything their biggest problem is that they are too well run to ever be in position to address the QB position. They are just never bad despite having mediocre weapons, low level QB play, and a mediocre to bad OLine.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
48,301
Reaction score
51,121
I mean, if you want to compare Dak to Cousins or Lamaar or Stafford, fine. But to compare him to Fields? That's even worse than trying to compare him to Mahomes!!!!
 

CowboysLakerBamaFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,066
Reaction score
3,930
If anything their biggest problem is that they are too well run to ever be in position to address the QB position. They are just never bad despite having mediocre weapons, low level QB play, and a mediocre to bad OLine.
Yeah similar to Chiefs, Ravens, etc.

Those teams have such a high floor.

Yet Chiefs still nab Mahomes
 
Top