I wish we had Justin Fields

[TheMarathonContinues]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get an equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

Well you goofed now didn’t you?

 

[Blue&Silver]

Fields sucks.

 

[SwagSurfer]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

One of the worst takes I've ever read.

 

[CowboysLakerBamaFan]

I too wish we had gotten Fields instead of Lance.

The Steelers got Fields for a 6th...for a guy with plenty of starting experience, and we paid a 4th for a guy that's never done anything.

Shows the difference between a shrewd front office....and Jerry.

My TOP choice would have been neither one of them, but if ur going to get 1, at least don't give up a 4th rd-er

 

[OmerV]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

Dak has his flaws, but it's nonsense to think Fields could push him. There is a reason Chicago was willing to let him go. He is not "equal or better" than Dak. Plus that, he only had one year left on his contract.

I too wish we had gotten Fields instead of Lance.

The Steelers got Fields for a 6th...for a guy with plenty of starting experience, and we paid a 4th for a guy that's never done anything.

Shows the difference between a shrewd front office....and Jerry.

My TOP choice would have been neither one of them, but if ur going to get 1, at least don't give up a 4th rd-er

This is a bogus take because you aren't talking apples to apples at all.

First, there was no choice between Lance and Fields. The two weren't available at the same time. Fields was just traded this past season and Lance was 2 years ago.

Second, Lance had 2 years left on his contract, so there was time to see if he could progress. With Fields there was only one year, so the expectation would have been he would sit on the bench one season and be gone.

 

[Rockport]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

 

[Rockport]

I too wish we had gotten Fields instead of Lance.

The Steelers got Fields for a 6th...for a guy with plenty of starting experience, and we paid a 4th for a guy that's never done anything.

Shows the difference between a shrewd front office....and Jerry.

My TOP choice would have been neither one of them, but if ur going to get 1, at least don't give up a 4th rd-er

 

[coult44]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get an equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

Since this is The ComedyZone now I have to ask Where do you clowns come up with your Garb Age is the only thing Fields has on Dak!!! Now I can join in and look as silly as this kind of horse crap post!!!

 

[NumOneQB]

Same people screaming for Lance to get a real shot at the starting spot. Lance and Fields are both bottom of the barrel NFL QBs.

 

[JW82]

There's better runningback to trade for.

 

[T-RO]

Lance was a drunk-Jerry trade, but Fields is nothing better.

Lance is the still the younger player with perhaps more to grow from the lack of college/pro reps. (Though I doubt it)

This thread is worse than both.... a train-wreck from it's conception.

 

[diamonddelts]

Worst thread ever.

 

[Nav22]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

"Dak sucks" because he can't win in the playoffs, they say...

Then in the same breath, these same people will hype Justin Fields and his 0 playoff appearances and 13-30 career record.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

Noooooooo.

 

[Qcard]

"Dak sucks" because he can't win in the playoffs, they say...

Then in the same breath, these same people will hype Justin Fields and his 0 playoff appearances and 13-30 career record.

Yep....these type of threads are allowed to breath forum oxygen

 

[kskboys]

Same people screaming for Lance to get a real shot at the starting spot. Lance and Fields are both bottom of the barrel NFL QBs.

Yeah, bottom of the barrell backup QB's.

 

[kskboys]

Really sad that the OP didn't have the nads to come back and acknowledge that he got this one wrong.

 

[joseephuss]

I too wish we had gotten Fields instead of Lance.

The Steelers got Fields for a 6th...for a guy with plenty of starting experience, and we paid a 4th for a guy that's never done anything.

Shows the difference between a shrewd front office....and Jerry.

My TOP choice would have been neither one of them, but if ur going to get 1, at least don't give up a 4th rd-er

If the Steelers front office is so much better than Jerry, why haven't they won a playoff game since the 2016 season?

 

[gimmesix]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

Well, we needed to sign a running back. One who can throw decently would have been a bonus.

 

[foofighters]

There I said.

I think we blew it by not going after Justin Fields in the offseason. Trading for Lance hasn't worked out, and now we're stuck with an overpaid QB and not enough talent around him.

Fields could have pushed Dak to step up his game and given us some much-needed leverage. Instead, we're left wondering "what if?" as other teams thrive with younger QB talent.

Did we miss our chance to get a equal or better QB that is cheaper than Dak? I think so.

wow...