CowboyRoy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,924
- Reaction score
- 38,930
A bit of your personal bias is showing here. Murray's 2013 season where he rushed for 1121 yards, had 416 yards receiving and scored 10 TDs was not average, let alone worse than average.
So if Murray was horrible, what was Morris? About 220 yards less from scrimmage and 6 fewer TDs?
You can prefer Morris and his contract over Murray and his, you can even believe that Morris will be a good fit, but you can not make the argument that 2014 was the only year Murray was better. With the exception of 2012, Murray has had more yards from scrimmage and more TDs in each season.
Murray was poorly used by Garrett his first 3 years. Other than the first year for Morris and the final year, he played on bad teams with bad Olines. Very similar circumstances in my opinion. If I had to take one player for equal money it would be Murray for his versatility. But neither guy to me is a stud RB or franchise type guy. For the money, I take Morris all day long.
When it comes to RB's, if you cant stay healthy and carry the load, you arent much good to a championship built team in my opinion. Murray getting hurt the first 3 years created the bias for me. I do believe that Morris is a better between the tackles runner with better vision. Hopefully that will shine when he gets a chance to run behind our line. I fear in the beginning of the season, however, we will be seeing more of McFadden then we should.