dbair1967;3207988 said:
Nebraska didnt play Alabama's schedule either.
As for the Bradford comment, you basically intimated that Texas could have handled OU with Bradford, but not Alabama. So I responded by noting that Bradford had basically nothign to do with the outcome of OU/Texas because he hardly played. OU was incredibly mediocre this year.
I'm sure on any given day any team "can play with" a certain team, but I doubt you'd find anybody, and certainly not a number of neutral people who'd agree with you that OU or Nebraska were anywhere near as good as Alabama this year.
That's true but what does that have to do with Nebraska having a better defense and/or being able to play with Alabama?
I intimate nothing. Texas has played OU with a healthy Bradford and come out victorious. Bama has not but that's here nor there. With a healthy Bradford, Bama would be hard pressed to beat OU. OU's defense is also very good and, IMO, would play very well against Bama's offense. Honestly, Bama is not special offensively. If you score early on them, you can beat them because all they have is a running attack. OU with Bradford could do that IMO.
I'm pretty certain that I could find a great many people who would say that OU with the #7 defense in the country and a healthy Heisman Winner Bradford at QB could not only play with OU but stand a very good chance of beating them.
I'm also certain that I could find a decent amount of people who look at what Nebraska was able to do against Texas with Colt and what they did to Az and say that Nebraska could also play with Bama.
After last night, I think there are probably a good many people who are not nearly as impressed with Alabama's defense and recognize that Bama, for the most part, is one dimensional on offense. Lets not go into special teams because Bama was horrid in this area.