The last thing we should be thinking is 4-3 DEF. We need to move away from this coaching tree if Quinn leaves
Unless they want our best player to wear down before his next contract we might think about the 34 D again.
PENN ST PLAYED A 4-3 Defense. TOM LANDRY 4-3 Defense. JIMMY JOHNSON 4-3 Defense.
No Cowboys team has won a Super Bowl in a 3-4 Defense. You do not need to play Parsons at DE. He can play the position he played at Penn St. in a 4-3 defense....Linebacker!!!!...all over the field.
You need defensive tackles and he (Parsons) would not have to catch OL from the other teams on every play. Parson is lining up at DE all the time because you have DTs that can generate inside pass rush where the QB cannot step up in the pocket. Parson would be greater in a real 4-3 defense/4-2-5 that protects linebackers and let them go tackle, blitz, and cover.
People forget that D Ware had DTs and inside DEs like Pro Bowler Jay Ratliff, studs like Canty, Hatcher, and Spears at those positions. When you have inside DL taking up the C and both OGs that leaves you one on one at DE or a RB/TE trying to stop a talent like Parsons. Demarcus Ware broke the LB sack record of 4-3 Blitzing LB Anthony Dickerson because Randy White was still dominant inside.
Dickerson again played LB in a 4-3 Defense but had 10.5 sacks, 114 tackles, and 1 interception. I think Parsons is a better prospect than Dickerson who was a UDFA.