If Roy Williams Didn't Play For Texas

MWILL

Fear the Afro
Messages
952
Reaction score
0
Would you still like him to be on the Cowboys roster?

Just curious.

Both players are good, but Boldin is better (imo).:starspin
 
MWILL;2029987 said:
Would you still like him to be on the Cowboys roster?

Just curious.

Both players are good, but Boldin is better (imo).:starspin

Yes I would. I like his size and playmaking ability. As for Boldin I have nothing bad to say about him he is a damn good player
 
Roy Williams playing for Texas has absolutely nothing to do with my interest in him for our team.

I live in Colorado and have only been in Texas to change planes in Dallas.

Debating which I would prefer is almost absurd because I would love to get either one.
 
I would like for Roy or Boldin to play on our team no matter where they played at in college.
 
The Rawhide Kid;2029993 said:
Yes. I would take either him or Boldin before I would go after Chad.


That's a tough choice. Chad does have the speed the Cowboys need for thier offence.
 
Sometimes I wondered if Roy Williams attending OU was a reason he was so polarizing (back when he was actually still good). But I don't think anyone cares about Roy Williams (WR) alma mater either way. He fits a need we currently have, and he might be available.

I think people would be more than happy with Williams or Boldin.
 
superpunk;2030006 said:
Sometimes I wondered if Roy Williams attending OU was a reason he was so polarizing (back when he was actually still good). But I don't think anyone cares about Roy Williams (WR) alma mater either way. He fits a need we currently have, and he might be available.

I think people would be more than happy with Williams or Boldin.


That's the vibe I was getting when I was reading some of the "which WR would you prefer" threads. In those threads I read that most people prefer
R. Williams over C. Johnson & Boldin.

What was going thru my mind was: Is it some kind of TX bias?

I live in TX BTW.
 
MWILL;2029987 said:
Would you still like him to be on the Cowboys roster?

Just curious.

Both players are good, but Boldin is better (imo).:starspin

I'd be quite happy with Anquan, but I prefer Roy because he's faster, and the Boys need some more speed at WR...

And yes, I'm a Horns fan, but I'd like Roy even if he was an Aggie... LOL...
 
MWILL;2030024 said:
That's the vibe I was getting when I was reading some of the "which WR would you prefer" threads. In those threads I read that most people prefer
R. Williams over C. Johnson & Boldin.

What was going thru my mind was: Is it some kind of TX bias?

I live in TX BTW.

For me it's Roy, Anquan close behind, and Chad a distant third (because of the age thing, and the 'tude thing)...
 
MWILL;2029987 said:
Would you still like him to be on the Cowboys roster?

Just curious.

Both players are good, but Boldin is better (imo).:starspin
Yes, his alma mater doesn't mean a thing to me.
 
Doesn't matter to me where he played in college. Any of these guys are better than what we have right now as our #2, and that should be the deciding factor.
 
I don't hate Roy but I hate spending first rounders on injury risks and when a player has missed time every year but one going back to his college days that should send a huge red flag up. There is no question in my mind that that fact hes a UT grad helps people turn a blind eye to that.

Boldin has also been banged up. Despite that he still averages 20 more catches for over 200 yards more per season over RW.

Chad Johnson misses no time and he outproduces both of the above. He has been a top 3 WR in this league for the past 5 years. Averaging 1300 yards on 85 catches year after year will do that. That is over 15 YPC people.

People can talk about how we need speed but TO is one of the fastest guys in the league and makes big play after big play. TO by himself gets that safety out of the box. What we need is a sure handed guy who has good speed and RAC ability to get open and not drop the ball on 3rd and 8.

To me its easy.

1) 85
2) Boldin
3) RW

just from a production and health standpoint its not even close.
 
MWILL;2029987 said:
Would you still like him to be on the Cowboys roster?

Just curious.

Both players are good, but Boldin is better (imo).:starspin

I'd take either of them.

Boldin has simply caught more balls, I don't know how you can claim definitively that one is better than the other.
 
Any of the three would be great pickups if one happens, here's their numbers for comparison sake.



Anquan Bolden 6-1 217 age: 27 10/3/1980

2003 Arizona Cardinals 16 16 101 1,377 13.6 71T 8
2004 Arizona Cardinals 10 9 56 623 11.1 31T 1
2005 Arizona Cardinals 14 14 102 1,402 13.7 54T 7
2006 Arizona Cardinals 16 16 83 1,203 14.5 64 4
2007 Arizona Cardinals 12 11 71 853 12.0 44T 9


Roy Williams 6-3 211 age: 26 12/20/1981

2004 Detroit Lions 14 11 54 817 15.1 46 8
2005 Detroit Lions 13 12 45 687 15.3 51T 8
2006 Detroit Lions 16 16 82 1,310 16.0 60T 7
2007 Detroit Lions 12 12 64 838 13.1 91T 5


Chad Johnson 6-1 192 age: 30 1/9/1978

2001 Cincinnati Bengals 12 3 28 329 11.8 28 1
2002 Cincinnati Bengals 16 14 69 1,166 16.9 72T 5
2003 Cincinnati Bengals 16 14 90 1,355 15.1 82T 10
2004 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 95 1,274 13.4 53T 9
2005 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 97 1,432 14.8 70T 9
2006 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 87 1,369 15.7 74T 7
2007 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 93 1,440 15.5 70T 8
 
TheCount;2030080 said:
I'd take either of them.

Boldin has simply caught more balls, I don't know how you can claim definitively that one is better than the other.

He catches 20 mmore a season at over 200 more yards. the only thing RW has going for him is him being from UT. Its really not that close and its not like RW is a burner.
 
FuzzyLumpkins;2030077 said:
To me its easy.

1) 85
2) Boldin
3) RW
Mine is exactly opposite of that.

1...30 years old as of January, has fewest prime years left.
2...28 in October.
3...27 in December
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,696
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top