If rumors are true...

[jackrussell]

I think now would be a good time for a poll.

More polls I say, to finally get to the bottom of this.​

 

[Cajuncowboy]

So you don't have a real answer? Now that's funny

When you start out with I'll keep hatin'. You said it all.

No answer needed.

 

[odog422]

No.

But that doesn't men that there are players that want him gone. You can dream up all the scenarios you want but that doesn't make it so. It's just speculation based on ESPN. Now there's a reputable source.

Ok...so even if they wanted him gone they wouldn't say so. You admit this. But you have no problem saying that since none of them have said this - which you just said they wouldn't - it's not the case.

You don't see anything wrong with that logic?

 

[Cajuncowboy]

I'll give you the same answer.

And, how many of these players are always in the news one way or the other that starts controversy? Answer that?

Well,

Romo with jessica and his "vacation" last year.

Witten as well since he went along.

Do you give them the same pass? If not then you MUST want them cut as well.

Greg ellis is always complaining about his job and contract. What about him?

Face it. The Cowboys are in the news because they have a star on their helmet.

 

[5Stars]

I think now would be a good time for a poll.​

More polls I say, to finally get to the bottom of this.​

This thread will eventually go to the dogs!

All because of one "i love me some me".

 

[Thick 'N Hearty]

When you start out with I'll keep hatin'. You said it all.

No answer needed.

You obviously have a man crush on TO, so the street goes both ways.

Give me a couple reasons why you would cut TO

 

[28 Joker]

Yep, and there isn't an immediate replacement for him. I don't think RW11, Crayton, Hurd, or Austin can step in and command double teams the way TO does.

Roy is the replacment. The $ says he is that for sure.

The Titans have no player who commands a double team. Yet, they marched up and down the field against the Ravens and hung 30 on the Steelers.

Justin Gage

What a nightmare.

 

[Cajuncowboy]

Ok...so even if they wanted him gone they wouldn't say so. You admit this. But you have no problem saying that since none of them have said this - which you just said they wouldn't - it's not the case.

You don't see anything wrong with that logic?

I see something wrong with the logic that says, "I have no proof he is a problem yet I want him gone."

You don't see a problem with that?

You have NOTHING to prove this.

Yet you want me to prove a negative?

Right-o!

 

[geeter]

Does he have any faults at all, in your mind? Any at all?

..........you'll need to ask the sports media
they'll give you the answer your looking for....:laugh2:

in fact ....they'll give so many reasons you can write a book....

however, they are just earning an "honest" living....uhhh...a living:starspin

 

[Cajuncowboy]

You obviously have a man crush on TO, so the street goes both ways.

Give me a couple reasons why you would cut TO

I have no man crush on the guy. If he falls off in his production to the point where he is not helping then I want him gone.

And I can't give you a reason to cut him because I don't want him cut. He's the best we have right now.

What I have is a team crush on the Cowboys. I love the team. What's so hard to grasp?

 

[Cajuncowboy]

This thread will eventually go to the dogs!

All because of one "i love me some me".

No, the haters will do that. Since it was a self proclaimed who started the thread, it would make sense.

 

[28 Joker]

I'll just repeat what Vela said, and he used the Terry Glenn situation as an example.

If Jerry is in a situation where he is isolated, he will defer to the organization.

Stephen Jones
Jason Garrett
Scouts
Wade Phillips

I believe the report that stated that Jerry was willing to cut Owens to keep Garrett.

I think Owens is gone, regardless.

 

[5Stars]

No, the haters will do that. Since it was a self proclaimed who started the thread, it would make sense.

We will just have to wait and see what he does if he's on the team this year.

But, expect to see some of the same controversey that he creates...it's in his genes.

 

[Thick 'N Hearty]

No, the haters will do that. Since it was a self proclaimed who started the thread, it would make sense.

Take em off man. You'll feel better

 

[Cajuncowboy]

I'll just repeat what Vela said, and he used the Terry Glenn situation as an example.

If Jerry is in a situation where he is isolated, he will defer to the organization.

Stephen Jones
Jason Garrett
Scouts
Wade Phillips

I believe the report that stated that Jerry was willing to cut Owens to keep Garrett.

I think Owens is gone, regardless.

Doesn't make sense though. No proof that Garrett and TO are at odds.

With that said, from a personnel perspective if you remember last year at this time we were screaming that one of our top needs was WR to take the pressure off TO. When we didn't get one in FA or the draft we were upset knowing that Glenn would be gone. Then we got Roy after four games and then four games after that we got our QB back. When they started to take the DT away from TO he flourished.

Now, we want to go back to the same situation with Roy by cutting TO?

That just makes no football sense at all.

 

[odog422]

I see something wrong with the logic that says, "I have no proof he is a problem yet I want him gone."

You don't see a problem with that?

You have NOTHING to prove this.

Yet you want me to prove a negative?

Right-o!

Only news reports from unnamed sources, which makes sense. As you agreed, no one would put their name out publically to state he's a problem. And ESPN wasn't the only one with the story.

And I didn't ask you to prove a negative, I asked how you could base your statement of an absolute when you admit the possibility that statements to oppose what you stated would not be said publically.

 

[Cajuncowboy]

Only news reports from unnamed sources, which makes sense. As you agreed, no one would put their name out publically to state he's a problem. And ESPN wasn't the only one with the story.

And I didn't ask you to prove a negative, I asked how you could base your statement of an absolute when you admit the possibility that statements to oppose what you stated would not be said publically.

And yet you want to try and prove it with nothing more than rumor.

Makes as much sense huh?

 

[wileedog]

Doesn't make sense though. No proof that Garrett and TO are at odds..

TO spent half the season complaining about Garrett.

Crayton even hinted as much that there is at least somewhat of a rift between them, which in player speak means they probably throw lawn darts at each other on sight.

I think its a fair assumption that neither will be thrilled that the other is back next year, although I agree I don't think Garrett returning automatically means TO is gone either.

It Jerry's World, they are just living in it.

 

[Cajuncowboy]

Take em off man. You'll feel better

After I said I would want him gone if he didn't produce....

After I gave you the stats that proved he was one of the best players on this team.

After all that you post this?????




You are a riot!

 

[Cajuncowboy]

TO spent half the season complaining about Garrett.

Crayton even hinted as much that there is at least somewhat of a rift between them, which in player speak means they probably throw lawn darts at each other on sight.

I think its a fair assumption that neither will be thrilled that the other is back next year, although I agree I don't think Garrett returning automatically means TO is gone either.

It Jerry's World, they are just living in it.

Disagreement = throwing lawn darts at each other?

OK.

But Like I said, there is no reason for TO to be cut. None. No one in this thread or any of the other 10 million threads have proved that.